this post was submitted on 29 Jan 2025
179 points (94.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27796 readers
1873 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either [email protected] or [email protected]. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email [email protected]. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try [email protected] or [email protected]


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Please state in which country your phrase tends to be used, what the phrase is, and what it should be.

Example:

In America, recently came across "back-petal", instead of back-pedal. Also, still hearing "for all intensive purposes" instead of "for all intents and purposes".

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 3 points 47 minutes ago

Idiocracy is literally a documentary anymore

[–] [email protected] 2 points 36 minutes ago (1 children)

I know someone that says 'Pacific' instead of 'specific'. The man has his talents & his place in the world, food man, but yes that is infuriating.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 13 minutes ago

I know someone who calls it the “Specific Ocean”

[–] [email protected] 3 points 57 minutes ago

Haha is this a follow up on that one post with the OP writing "back-petal"?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago)

Using "racking" instead of the correct "wracking" in "wracking my brain". Not very common, but it annoys me... But not as much as "could of"... That is the worst, just stop it!

This is online and in person in Canada.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago (4 children)

Niche is pronounced neesh and not nitch

[–] Feathercrown 3 points 1 hour ago

I've heard this one like 3 times in the last month on youtube and it bothers me a lot

[–] SLVRDRGN 6 points 2 hours ago
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 hour ago

Using “uncomfy” instead of uncomfortable. I recognize this one is fully style, but it’s like nails on a chalkboard. Break the entirely fake rules of grammar and spelling all you want, but have some decency when it comes to connotation.

Comfy is an informal and almost diminutive form (not technically, but it follows the structure so it kinda feels like it) of comfortable. You have to have a degree of comfort to use the less formal “comfy,” so uncomfy is just…paradoxical? Oxymoronic? Ironic? I’d be ok with it used for humor, but not in earnest.

Relatedly, for me “comfy” is necessarily referring to physical comfort, not emotional. I can be either comfy or comfortable in a soft fuzzy chair. I can be comfortable in a new social situation. I can be uncomfortable in either. I can be uncomfy in neither, because that would be ridiculous.

FWIW I would never actually correct someone on this. I would immediately have my linguist card revoked, and I can’t point to a real fake grammatical rule that would make it “incorrect” even if I wanted to. But this is the one and only English usage thing I hate, and I hate it very, very much.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

"that begs the question". I wish people would just use the more correct "raises the question", especially people doing educational/academic content. I hear it across the English-speaking internet

[–] SLVRDRGN 2 points 1 hour ago* (last edited 1 hour ago) (1 children)

From what I've understood, "begging" a question is more like "evading" a question. (Here's a video)

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 hour ago

Begging the question was originally a very specific logical fallacy. It's a type of reasoning where you circularly try to prove your argument. I just kinda wish the usage wasn't being muddied. https://danielmiessler.com/blog/the-original-meaning-of-begging-the-question

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

This thread peaks my interest.

I hope my words piqued someone else’s interests more.

[–] SLVRDRGN 4 points 2 hours ago

Oh this one's peak

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

They're, you're

Sneak peek

In portuguese: mas/mais - people often use "mais" (plus, sum) when the correct would be mas (but)

[–] naun 1 points 46 minutes ago (1 children)

What do people say wrong istead of "sneek peek"?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 hours ago (4 children)

"For all intensive porpoises" is the one that really annoys me.

They're dolphins, not porpoises. Fuck, get your cetaceans right.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 38 minutes ago

Lol I believe it's "for all intents and doplhins."

[–] naun 2 points 43 minutes ago

For all intensive porpoises, we should create a care-free environment.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 hours ago

For all intensive dolphins

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›