JubilantJaguar

joined 2 years ago
[–] JubilantJaguar 3 points 2 days ago

Interesting, thanks. Had not considered that second point.

[–] JubilantJaguar 1 points 2 days ago

OK that's all fair enough. But isn't this just a situation of humans being humans? Blaming Wikipedia for it is like blaming the United Nations for the lack of world peace.

Not saying you're wrong, exactly, but I also think you don't have an idea, realistically, of how to make Wikipedia function better on controversial subjects. I certainly don't. It's easy to bash Wikipedia, like it's easy to bash the UN. In the meantime, cynicism is corrosive and Wikipedia is all we have.

[–] JubilantJaguar 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

for terminal tabs and splits. Only recently did I realize that tmux is the better option, even for local use

Reasoning?

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 3 days ago

Completely agree. Alas.

[–] JubilantJaguar 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (3 children)

This sounds like the script for a Jehovah's Witnesses induction session. Jesting aside, it's a decent plan.

And this assumes that Matrix and its mobile client (I forget its name) are ready for the big time. Not sure if that's true. The UX and reliability have to be flawless before Matrix can be recommended to normies. If not then the experiment will end badly for everyone including Matrix and the cause of software freedom. That's my view.

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's an idea too. But personally I think this worrying about the dominance of a single site is a bit misplaced, assuming that the server uses the same software and protocols. There's advantages in having some centralization. More resources can be put into the chosen instance to improve its reliability and its moderation. These need to be absolute priorities when trying to attract new users.

A certain encyclopedia site has a de-facto monopoly of the encyclopedia space. That's not a problem because it has the right governance and ownership structure. I think the discussion space could perhaps use a similar site.

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 3 days ago

Others are telling you you're an idiot but you're not.

The noun-pronoun distinction for the possessive apostrophe is irrational. Unlike other European languages, English never had a formal institution to dictate orthography. This odd incoherence would never have lingered in French, let alone ultra-logical German.

Personally I think the possessive apostrophe looks semi-illiterate even when it's correct. It should be Harrys Bar like it would be in German.

[–] JubilantJaguar 4 points 3 days ago (9 children)

Alternative: just send them to World and do not even mention the whole federation thing. Federation is essentially a power feature for a few people who care about it.

For normies, the real killer USP will be something much simpler: no ads.

[–] JubilantJaguar 1 points 3 days ago

Apart from the the janky scrolling it works great as a reader app, yeah. Zero distractions and fast.

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 4 days ago

Hybrids: irrelevant and complex red herring that's already on the way out. E-bikes: sure. But electric scooters will be the real salvation IMO. It's a drop-in replacement which is actually cheaper and simpler. Path already blazed by China. The end of the abominable combustion scooter is now just a matter of time.

[–] JubilantJaguar 1 points 4 days ago (2 children)

Try reading an entire epub book in scroll mode and you'll see the use case.

[–] JubilantJaguar 5 points 4 days ago

Yes, in theory I feel that way. But if you're sincere in your DGAF take, I think that would make you either unusually self-confident or a small-bore psychopath. Like it or not, humans are social animals and this is a social time of year. I basically share your take but I wont pretend I enjoy the ambience of being a loner at this time of year. I'll feel much better about it again next week. Deep down I think you probably agree.

 

Banks, email providers, booking sites, e-commerce, basically anything where money is involved, it's always the same experience. If you use the Android or iOS app, you stayed signed in indefinitely. If you use a web browser, you get signed out and asked to re-authenticate constantly - and often you have to do it painfully using a 2FA factor.

For either of my banks, if I use their crappy Android app all I have to do is input a short PIN to get access. But in Firefox I also get signed out after about 10 minutes without interaction and have to enter full credentials again to get back in - and, naturally, they conceal the user ID field from the login manager to be extra annoying.

For a couple of other services (also involving money) it's 2FA all the way. Literally no means of staying signed in on a desktop browser more than a single session - presumably defined as 30 minutes or whatever. Haven't tried their own crappy mobile apps but I doubt very much it is such a bad experience.

Who else is being driven crazy by this? How is there any technical justification for this discrimination? Browsers store login tokens just like blackbox spyware on Android-iOS, there is nothing to stop you staying signed in indefinitely. The standard justification seems to be that web browsers are less secure than mobile apps - is there any merit at all to this argument?

Or is all this just a blatant scam to push people to install privacy-destroying spyware apps on privacy-destroying spyware OSs, thus helping to further undermine the most privacy-respecting software platform we have: the web.

If so, could a legal challenge be mounted using the latest EU rules? Maybe it's time for Open Web Advocacy to get on the case.

Thoughts appreciated.

view more: next ›