JubilantJaguar

joined 2 years ago
[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 1 hour ago

This diet can make them as "well" as they like, it will never be sustainable on a planet of 8 billion people. For beef-eating carnivores to be "well", others will not be able to have that freedom. There just isn't enough land to support it.

This is a delicate message to get across, but it has the benefit of being irrefutable.

[–] JubilantJaguar 1 points 1 hour ago

Yes but we are also going to have to compromise on issues where a big part of the electorate does not hold doctrinaire progressive values (in Europe this means one thing: immigration). It won't be enough to spam the "stupid" voters with low-brow memes and make fun of "nazis" and hope that non-progressives suddenly become enlightened and see that their values are wrong. There will have to be substantive concessions on policy. Even "stupid" voters know when they're being manipulated.

[–] JubilantJaguar 4 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

It's not a constitutional crisis quite yet. The attack on institutions is real but so far it's legal. The plan seems to be to overwhelm and demoralize the defenders so that they don't even fight back. The constitutional crisis comes when and if the government ignores a court order.

[–] JubilantJaguar 5 points 20 hours ago

the acounced Tarrifs

In case people are wondering, this was an 80s Moroccan rock band. I'm a fan.

[–] JubilantJaguar 3 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Yes, this is the alternative. And it's a PITA as you say. And might not even be possible in the future, given the trend towards locking down Android and OSs in general.

[–] JubilantJaguar 3 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The people you know are not representative of the world population, and becoming even less so every day.

[–] JubilantJaguar 3 points 2 days ago (10 children)

Obsessing about this increasingly irrelevant figure is pointless. Most people do not even have desktop computers outside work, and the number is going to keep dropping and dropping. The world has moved to mobile.

As Linux nerds who care about the future of free personal computing, we need to reboot our minds and focus on how to get free software onto mobile devices and into mobile applications.

The FOSS Linux stack is going nowhere on mobile (I have speaking rights here: I once bought an Ubuntu phone). Our last best hope is web apps that use web standards. I say we transfer our obsession to that project instead, rather than worry about this distraction of a statistic.

[–] JubilantJaguar 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

But it's a free Europe-based provider that's not US big tech. A better suggestion?

To be clear, I use a paid service (Mailbox.org) for my main email, as everyone should do.

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 2 days ago

I usually refer to England as Great Brittan? Is that generally preferred?

No, because it's wrong!

  • Great Britain = England + Scotland + Wales
  • UK = Great Britain + Northern Ireland
  • British = citizen of (careful!) UK

You're welcome.

Are there many Spanish speakers in Great Brittan?

Far fewer than there are English speakers.

[–] JubilantJaguar 2 points 2 days ago

They are right. Terminology is important in this discussion.

[–] JubilantJaguar 4 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's considered a good idea because it runs over omnipresent, already-existent, distributed infrastructure. In other words, for this particular chat app, you don't even need to create an account. That is at very least an interesting and noteworthy feature.

[–] JubilantJaguar 22 points 3 days ago (3 children)

some issues with many email providers

This turned out to be the deal-breaker for me. GMX kept locking me out of my account because of the DeltaChat messages. They're (of course) full of cyphertext and to email providers this must look a look like spam.

The open-to-abuse nature of email claims yet another victim.

 

This one really did happen in the shower.

 

Banks, email providers, booking sites, e-commerce, basically anything where money is involved, it's always the same experience. If you use the Android or iOS app, you stayed signed in indefinitely. If you use a web browser, you get signed out and asked to re-authenticate constantly - and often you have to do it painfully using a 2FA factor.

For either of my banks, if I use their crappy Android app all I have to do is input a short PIN to get access. But in Firefox I also get signed out after about 10 minutes without interaction and have to enter full credentials again to get back in - and, naturally, they conceal the user ID field from the login manager to be extra annoying.

For a couple of other services (also involving money) it's 2FA all the way. Literally no means of staying signed in on a desktop browser more than a single session - presumably defined as 30 minutes or whatever. Haven't tried their own crappy mobile apps but I doubt very much it is such a bad experience.

Who else is being driven crazy by this? How is there any technical justification for this discrimination? Browsers store login tokens just like blackbox spyware on Android-iOS, there is nothing to stop you staying signed in indefinitely. The standard justification seems to be that web browsers are less secure than mobile apps - is there any merit at all to this argument?

Or is all this just a blatant scam to push people to install privacy-destroying spyware apps on privacy-destroying spyware OSs, thus helping to further undermine the most privacy-respecting software platform we have: the web.

If so, could a legal challenge be mounted using the latest EU rules? Maybe it's time for Open Web Advocacy to get on the case.

Thoughts appreciated.

view more: next ›