this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
414 points (98.1% liked)

politics

19096 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Lol, that was quick. Effectively, “Thanks for your supporters but we’ll be fine without you”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 33 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I would love nothing more than for this to be true and to hit that one RFK fan we have on lemmy with it, but the article doesn't really give much evidence to support the title.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 days ago

hit that one RFK fan we have on Lemmy with it

Idk why, but this made me laugh so hard. I know I have seen the elusive Lemmy RFK fan in a thread somewhere.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 6 days ago (3 children)

If you think RFK's whiplash is bad, wait until Musk finds out Trump has no more need for him either.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Musk has money to give Trump

[–] [email protected] 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Musk doesn't want to give money to Trump.

Must wanted Trump elected so he could make his self driving systems road legal for robotaxis. He's hoping to get all that money back and then some. If he gets what he wants, he'll be most of the way towards being a trillionaire.

But Trump is not a man who pays his debts and I'm here for the inevitable betrayal.

[–] phoneymouse 3 points 6 days ago

Also, he doesn’t want Trump to ban EVs, or otherwise put up roadblocks to their adoption.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Didn't Musk find that out the first time too? He was advising Trump in 2016 and had a falling out after Trump left the Paris climate agreement.

[–] cultsuperstar 6 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I'm kind of surprised because Tesla and Trumpnis pro coal and gas. Is Elon eating his own face? Or is he willing to cannibalize Tesla because he has government contracts and Trump will probably hand him any government contract he wants?

[–] [email protected] 7 points 6 days ago

Musk has most of his wealth in Tesla stock. That will skyrocket if his substandard self-driving tech is allowed to be used in unattended autonomous taxis.

Instead of selling cars, he'll sell a service. Instead of selling a car costing $40,000, each car will make that in a few months.

[–] iAvicenna 17 points 6 days ago (1 children)

pharmaceutical companies probably made some lucrative deals with Trump to be pro vaccine. This guy learned from first hand why he should not suck up to a guy who worships money and power

[–] Masta_Chief 3 points 6 days ago

Evil companies pressuring an evil man... equals a positive result?? I'm surprised at the way that math math'ed out

[–] Jumpingspiderman 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I guess we now know how crazy you have to be for Trump not to want you around. Like "WORM ATE MY BRAIN" crazy.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

Nah, "Brain-eating worm tried to eat my brain and died from it," crazy.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago (1 children)

I see nothing in the article that indicates Trump himself feels this way. What his "advisors" think is irrelevant.

[–] morphballganon 1 points 6 days ago (1 children)

The advisors are what makes this time different from last time. This time, they have a plan. Turnip loves when other people come up with plans, because he can't.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 days ago

Turnip loves when other people come up with plans, because he ~~can't~~ can just ignore it and do what he wants anyway

That's like the one silver lining I'm seeing out of this whole situation, is that Trump can't stick to a plan if his literal life and freedom depend on it. We saw that in action in the E. Jean Carroll defamation suit. It doesn't matter how well the plans are laid by his mice and men, he's not going to read them. And if we're lucky that by itself will be enough to prevent a total enactment of P2025.

[–] paddirn 6 points 6 days ago

Hopefully the doublecross comes soon and they hang him out to dry before they get into office.

[–] VantaBrandon 7 points 6 days ago (1 children)

But bear meat stocks are at an all time high

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 6 days ago

I was thinking about this the other day - dimbulbs like ronnie desatan outlawed clean meat in his state - as did Alabama - meanwhile, one of their own apparently eats actual roadkill and had a brain worm?

Cannot make this stuff up. The right wing is just so unhinged. Every time I see one of them doing something dumber and dumber, including to themselves, I think of the state of America in the book Rapture of the Nerds. It was supposed to be parody, but.....

[–] cmbabul 191 points 1 week ago (6 children)

This is legit the best political news this week by a wide margin. It’s still gonna fucking suck but at least we won’t have to worry about fucking polio on top of it

[–] billiam0202 112 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Kentucky voted to keep public taxpayer dollars from going to private schools.

It's not much, but it's a small win for us.

[–] Eldritch 1 points 6 days ago

Yup, Missouri voted to allow abortion again. It isn't much either, another small win. That was completely negated when they overwhelmingly voted for the man that will ban it nationally.

[–] cmbabul 28 points 1 week ago

Good work Kentucky! I don’t get to say this enough but I’m proud of you.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Let's see if that even matters. Red States have a history of ignoring votes like that.

[–] Mirshe 3 points 6 days ago

See: Ohio basically trying everything it could to avoid enacting legal marijuana.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 111 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Imagine thinking a Donald Trump promise holds any value

[–] chiliedogg 3 points 6 days ago

Him not following through on shit is all the hope I have left.

[–] partial_accumen 24 points 1 week ago (4 children)

Donald Trump's promises are a solid as the water they're written on.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] d00phy 85 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait a second, you mean Trump just used the guy and is now dropping him like a half-eaten Big Mac? I am shocked. SHOCKED, I say.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 52 points 1 week ago (8 children)

Don’t be ridiculous.

Trump would never eat only half a Big Mac

[–] chiliedogg 1 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

He already ate 3 full ones. This is the remnants of the 4th.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nobody wants JFK Jr in charge of their health, not even Trump and they knew it from the start. But good to see.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] simplejack 43 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As a nearly 80 year old man who is likely eating a fistful of pills every morning, he might want to ensure that the FDA is still regulating that stuff.

[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (4 children)

You don't really need that if you have access to money. You just get a real doctor, not one of the quacks that you drag out for political theater to appease the ignorant conspiracy loving base.

US drugs unsafe? import them from europe or directly from the pharmaceutical company that makes them.

The only people who get fucked by these decisions are the "normal" people without great wealth or connections.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Lest anyone think this is about policy or even politics - it ain't.

This is about the wrong guy getting the headlines. Simple as.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Burn_The_Right 34 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (5 children)

He doesn't need RFK to run the FDA, because Trump is going to just scuttle it entirely.

Science bad! Doctors bad! Let the drug companies do what they want! Freedumb y'all!

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Sludgehammer 32 points 1 week ago (3 children)

So we're past the "big tent" stage and to the "Stabbing in the back" stage.

[–] AbidanYre 25 points 1 week ago

That took what like a quarter of a mooch?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis 16 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Fucking coward. Own up to your shitty beliefs.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›