this post was submitted on 04 Mar 2025
366 points (98.7% liked)

Not The Onion

13891 readers
2154 users here now

Welcome

We're not The Onion! Not affiliated with them in any way! Not operated by them in any way! All the news here is real!

The Rules

Posts must be:

  1. Links to news stories from...
  2. ...credible sources, with...
  3. ...their original headlines, that...
  4. ...would make people who see the headline think, “That has got to be a story from The Onion, America’s Finest News Source.”

Comments must abide by the server rules for Lemmy.world and generally abstain from trollish, bigoted, or otherwise disruptive behavior that makes this community less fun for everyone.

And that’s basically it!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] fiendishplan 2 points 2 hours ago

The 15ft tall 8,000 pound mouse was last seen rampaging in the downtown area. OK that's what I wanted the article to say.

[–] mcqtom 11 points 8 hours ago

This was wise. They had to create the woolly mice so that when they create the woolly mammoths, they can woolly control them.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 hours ago (2 children)

Why? How about focusing on preventing more extinctions instead of some Jurassic Park bullshit.

[–] Alteon 6 points 4 hours ago

We already know how to prevent more extinctions. Better environmental laws, more green spaces, better conservation efforts, less suburban sprawl, etc. You know, things that will never happen.

[–] calcopiritus 6 points 7 hours ago

We have to experiment with mice before achieving the ultimate goal of laser shooting sharks.

[–] LaunchesKayaks 3 points 9 hours ago

Oh my god I want one so bad

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

This means they’re gonna make wooly elephants and try to make us call them woolly mammoths.

[–] DerArzt 3 points 10 hours ago

We spared no expense!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

I am skeptical of all articles with "scientists" in the title... but those mice are really cute. 😙

[–] popekingjoe 41 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Everything weird about this aside... Those mice are fucking adorable.

[–] IzzyJ 3 points 7 hours ago

Agreed 100%. I know they arent for sale, but I kinda want to look into them as pets

[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 day ago (5 children)

Can I be nit-picky here for a second?

If you're genetically modifying an elephant for cold tolerance and fur growth, you're not "bring a mammoth back from extinction", you're creating a furry elephant. It may look somewhat like a mammoth, but genetically it's not a mammoth at all.

It's like saying you can genetically modify a homo-sapien to have a pronounced brow ridge and a hairier back and say that you've brought the neandertal back from extinction. No you haven't, you've just designed a human who looks different.

[–] gofsckyourself 26 points 21 hours ago

Well, the goal isn't to just create woolly mammoth-lile creatures by copying characteristics. The goal is to recreate the genome from what genome data we have into a living creature.

It's not like they are trying to create a sweded version, but take a creature that is already close and change the genes to match.

At least, that's how I understood it based on the article.

[–] Silic0n_Alph4 12 points 21 hours ago (2 children)

And next you’ll say that genetically-modified ears aren’t enough to make catgirls real either 😩

Can we let this one go? Not for science, not for accuracy, but for the prospect of having catgirls in our lifetimes, at least?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 hours ago

Give me the genetherapy that makes me an anthropomorphic dog.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 hours ago

And catboys! We can be equal opportunity here.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

I already have the hairy back, can I say I am half neanderthalensis? Better than homo sapiens seeing how things are going...

[–] asdfasdfasdf 1 points 1 day ago

That's not nit picky.

[–] [email protected] -3 points 1 day ago (3 children)

And the most annoying part is that this is incredibly fcking useless. Wooly mammoths went extinct for a reason. Large animals are become less and less evolutionary preferred. Wooly mammoths are adjusted for the cold while our globe is warming.

Can we just use our fcking resources for things that matter?????

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Nobody cares about wooly mammoths. This is a test of gene editing techniques that can eradicate genetic diseases.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 10 hours ago

Then call it what it is

[–] [email protected] 9 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

You're using the same logic my dad uses to rail against going to Mars. He says there is no worthwhile reason to go there when more pressing matters on earth are in abundance.

Just like you, he is missing the forest for the trees, angrily ignorant to the fact that the knowledge you gained from trying to achieve a seemingly worthless achievement is the actual value, not in the achievement itself.

The achievement is just a convenient goal to make the science more exciting to the general public so as to garner more financial support from both private and government sources. Each of the steps needed to gain that achievement may not have gained as much funding as they do now if they were presented separately from that final goal.

[–] scholar -2 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

When your house is on fire you don't start looking for package holidays to Pompeii, no matter how much you might learn. We have all the knowledge we need to avert the climate crisis, we just need action and resources dedicated to fixing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 hours ago

What do you want the geneticists to do? They are educated in their domain, you can't just plop them into another field

The applications of their work is likely plenty in medicine and bioengineering

[–] [email protected] -3 points 19 hours ago

Dang I guess me and your father would rly vibe then because I feel the same about colonizing Mars

[–] FoolHen 6 points 20 hours ago (2 children)

Not really, we humans killed most big land animals that we found as we expanded our territory, back when we were hunters. This happened in big "islands" like Australia and Madagascar, as well as all the small islands. There, large animals had lived in equilibrium for centuries, and their extinction matches some short time after humans arrived. An exception are the galapago islands, as they were discovered in the 19th century.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 14 hours ago

And to recreate the species they’d need hundreds of them from different genetic material. Which means they’ll likely create a single one that will eventually die and costed billions of dollars.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 19 hours ago

Besides the fact that the hunting hypothesis is that; a hypothesis, there's a lot of other factors as to why it isn't a good idea. Mainly, ohh idk... The fact that they have had no place in nature in over tens of thousands of years? Even if we managed to create an artificial habitat and role in an ecosystem for them, they would be very vulnerable due to megafauna's increased minimum land requirements because of their size and in danger constantly due to climate change.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 day ago (1 children)

mouse sized woolly mammoth would be pretty fucking cool.

imagine the sound when he toots his little trunk.

could store him in the fridge.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

But how would he get in the fridge?

[–] [email protected] 14 points 20 hours ago

Open door, giraffe goes out, mammoth goes in, close door

[–] [email protected] 6 points 21 hours ago

gotta start somewhere

[–] Fuckfuckmyfuckingass 44 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Kind of a dick move to bring an animal from the Ice Age, back to experience global warming.

[–] Frozengyro 23 points 1 day ago

Global warming 2 extinction boogaloo

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 day ago

They do look extremely cute though.

[–] teft 16 points 1 day ago

Is this how we get tribbles?

[–] takeheart 10 points 1 day ago

new Pokémon just dropped?

[–] iAvicenna 8 points 1 day ago

How many butts do the mice have?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Got the woolly m, just need a few more letters.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago

I'd like to buy a vowel. "U?"

Damnit!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Ever since I was a kid I've always been hyped about the idea of them bringing back the mammoth. Been hearing about it my whole life...

But I have to ask... Why are we trying to, exactly? I mean, the planet's heating up. why are we trying to reintroduce a woolly mammoth? It's one thing if they're talking about using actual mammoth DNA and cloning it, but that article was talking about specifically just turning on some genes that cause fur and cold tolerance... What is the point of just making furry elephants at this point? Where are we sticking them, and why are we sticking them there? Is there some ecological niche that needs filling? Are we going to attempt to populate Antarctica (and hope it stays cold enough for that?) with hirsute pachyderms?

How about a different plan? As much as I have been excited woolly mammoths my entire life, let's try something a little different. Let's shrink the elephants we have, and introduce them into North America. Elephants the size of bison, roaming the continent. You can still make them cold tolerant, to handle winters, and give em some fur if you want. But the elephants we have are going extinct, and you're worrying about bringing back something else. How about we save what we have? Let them roam and graze Europe and North America, replacing the Aurochs and the bison. God knows we're not going to stop eating anything too cow like, so wild bison is basically right out. Let's let the elephant fill these niches, and save the species. They're too fucking smart to let die. Elephants got fucking religion, y'all. We cannot let them die.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Reintroducing mammoths in the arctic could potentially help reduce the climate change.

There is a scientist in Siberia who built the Pleistocene Park. An area where he reintroduced a lot of large herbivores and studied their impact. He's saying that boreal forest have a very low biodiversity compared to mammoth steppes. The steppes have way more animals, are stocking way more carbon in the soil and prevent methane leaks by keeping the permafrost frozen due to the low albedo of the biome.

The problem is that with the mammoths are indispensable to maintain the steppes. They are the only animal big enough to clear up trees, without them the forest is taking over and all the ecosystem of the steppes disappear.

So (according to this scientist), resurrecting the mammoth could revive a whole ecosystem, with a very rich biodiversity and that could have a give impact on the climate.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So there is a good reason, then? I've googled it before, and the best answers I've gotten are basically "cause MAMMOTHS!"

If that's the case and there's a good reason, then hell yeah, do whatever we can to prevent climate collapse!

But also, give me small elephants, please? Especially if they can manage Chihuahua sized elephants. I would have so many! And I would make sure they always have a clear view of the moon goddess they worship

[–] Silic0n_Alph4 3 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Don’t let me harsh your vibe here, but are you sure about the moon thing? https://www.iflscience.com/the-internet-appears-to-believe-elephants-worship-the-moon-58666

I’m down with chihuahua-sized elephants, though, don’t get me wrong here.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 19 hours ago

I mean, I figured it was more meme-y than accurate, but good to know. Still, they're smart as fuck and mourn their dead, and seem to have rituals, sacred spaces, and generational knowledge. Shrink them suckers down and let me give a whole herd of petite pachyderms a patch of paradise, please

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

We need to answer the age old question - what did wooly mammoths taste like?

[–] RaoulDook 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

"We were like this close" 🤏

[–] ivanafterall 3 points 8 hours ago

I like to imagine that every time they open the big test tube/canister thing, it's a totally different animal, but woolly.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'd like to buy a vowel. "U!"

Damnit!