IzzyJ

joined 2 years ago
[–] IzzyJ 2 points 5 days ago

I hope when I get to boomer age, I complain about how it used to snow or Roe like I am now. Unless those problems are fixed ofc

[–] IzzyJ 38 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Now is a good time for all Americans to learn about Juror Nullification

[–] IzzyJ 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)
[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 week ago

I have no skilled jobs and would still meed to learn French. From when I looked into it, it seemed the province specifically needed to nominate you

[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 week ago

All of the idiots who think this is a good idea are trigger happy idiots

[–] IzzyJ 18 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Everything I hear about Quebec makes me like it more. If only it were easier for me specifically to immigrate

[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 week ago

Long as youre cis ig

[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Civil religion is very different from trying to legislate christianity

[–] IzzyJ 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You and I see that, but does the DNC see jt? Cuz staying home sure doesnt seem to be driving the message

[–] IzzyJ 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

Maybe I am thinking about it in absolutist terms, but im also young. I see nimbyism stifle housing in blue states and conservatives having a ton of kids and fear the country will only get redder. In my lifetime, we reached gay marriage only ten or so years ago and things are already being pushed back far further. Roe, a ruling made decades before I was born, has been overturned and set abortion law back just as far. I think having lived through most of it, you may be biased; but progress is not a guarantee. Things can always go backward, and there's no limit to how far

[–] IzzyJ 3 points 1 week ago (3 children)

Why would yhe DNC run candidates for a base that didnt show up? Even if they would do better, and I think they would, what makes you think that what the dullards at the DNC will think

[–] IzzyJ -1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How the hell does 1% of the population get 50% to stop hating it and believing bullshit about it

 

Lemmy is a smaller site than Reddit, even before taking into account federation. So I cast a wide net here. A lot of specific popular shows like Futurama have dedicated communities, but I thought it'd be fun to have a generalized one

https://lemmy.world/c/animatedseries

 

I constantly see angry mobs of people decrying "woke", "critical race theory", ""grooming"", and whatever other nonsense they made up this week. They march around with guns, constantly appending lib as a prefix to any word they can use to denigrate. They actively plot violence and spew hatred in the open.

You never see the inverse. There is no ConservativesofTiktok getting churches harassed into shutting down for the day or calling in threats. You don't see cringey boomer memes on the left. And whenever I openly express those feelings, try to create that sentiment; I get shut down. Noone agrees, I'm often shamed and muted. I just don't understand why that parity exists, it's extremely isolating to feel so alone in this

 

I know a little bit of lore, but not a whole lot (I just listen to lore channels at work lol). But the question occurred to me upon thinking about midichlorians. I recall hearing somewhere they connect to blood cells, but I know I'm losing my mind so maybe I just made that up somewhere

35
Shame Flag (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 year ago by IzzyJ to c/[email protected]
 
0
I'm transsexual, not transgenser (self.unpopularopinion)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by IzzyJ to c/unpopularopinion
 

Some people feel the term is outdated. They say this while parading around what to me seem oxymorons, like "non binary women" or "he/him lesbians".

When a lot of these people say they aren't comfortable with their gender, I notice they often mention things like clothes, makeup, hobbies. More generally, they seem to talk about gender roles- masculine and feminine- than something to do with their bodies.

Here's the fact of the matter. Bathrooms, pronouns, legal documents; they aren't referring to any of that. They're referring to what's in your pants, or if you have boobs, or grow facial hair. Most people, myself included, don't care if you wanna wear clothes or behave in a way assigned to the opposed sex (there are folks who do of course, and most of us here know they're assholes). But unless you're changing something about that, it doesn't warrent a change in your pronouns or documents or bathrooms. As much as my own rights are under threat, I can't help but sympathize with the folks upset with that, I don't wanna share the ladies' room with what amounts to a femboy or "metrosexual" either.

Sex is bimodal, and I use the term bimodal specifically. There are edge cases, such as intersex people, or those with hormonal conditions like PCOS. I would argue transsexuals, those like myself who seek to change or sex, are among them. And hell, actual enben who seek out procedures like gender nullification too. I don't take hormones because I want to be feminine. I take them to be as close to female as I can possibly get with the medical technology available. That's how I want to be seen, and treated. I plan on surgery to change what's in my pants. If I could get a menstrual cycle out of that, I would, and probably go on to have children (because infertility is another perk of transition).

I don't have anything against the sorts of people I'm talking about- I want to be abundantly clear on that. Same with those who say, dont want bottom surgery. My frustration is more with the terminology, because there is a delineation there that I feel is erased. People decry older terms like transsexual as "outdated", but I feel it's much more apt for my experience. I am transitioning to the other sex (or as close as I can). My gender has been constant all the while

view more: next ›