this post was submitted on 23 Oct 2024
1196 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19240 readers
3006 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 170 points 2 months ago (1 children)

They spent those 50 years convincing half the voting population that evidence doesn’t matter, unfortunately.

[–] [email protected] 37 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Good old degradation of public school standards.

[–] halcyoncmdr 19 points 2 months ago

Combined with 24 hour propaganda on "news" nwtworks

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 146 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Oh no ... it did work ... it worked spectacularly ... for the top wealthiest people in the world

They figured out that they could cut the amount of taxes they had to pay, collect even more wealth for themselves and convince everyone around them and all the poor people out there like you and me that it was all perfectly acceptable, and sensible and that we should all keep electing government officials to keep that system going while we all paid for it. The wealthiest figured out how they could keep their money and make us all pay for it. And they did it for 50 years. And they're still doing it.

I think it worked fantastic ..... for them.

[–] negativenull 27 points 2 months ago (2 children)

We just need to be more patient and tax-cut the wealthy even harder. Then it'll properly start to trickle. Just a little longer

[–] pivot_root 18 points 2 months ago

I think I can feel it. It's warm. And... smells a bit like asparagus?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I agree ... but the problem is ... it took 50 years for us to get to this point and it will probably take 50 years or longer to get it back to a manageable level again. That is, if we take 50 years of consistently pushing back against the wealthy in the same way that the wealthy have been pressing the poor for the past 50 years.

[–] negativenull 9 points 2 months ago

Lina Khan (in the US) is taking those first steps. Harris better keep her in place.

[–] [email protected] 81 points 2 months ago (5 children)

How about we try some trickle up economics for a while? That's where you give money to people who actually need it, and let businesses compete for them as customers, and the revenue will trickle up to successful companies.

Might as well, right?

[–] [email protected] 22 points 2 months ago (1 children)

We did. Brought to you by Roosevelt.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 months ago

(Offer not available to black people)

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nifty 67 points 2 months ago (9 children)

This will never stop being funny

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] OhStopYellingAtMe 67 points 2 months ago

Yeah, no shit…

[–] [email protected] 55 points 2 months ago (4 children)

Saw this earlier today, just saying.

[–] PineRune 29 points 2 months ago

But my Maga coworker just told me she wants to make everything more expensive! Now I don't know who to believe; you both sound equally sensible. /s

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

But I was just about to be a millionaire 😭😭😭

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Crankenstein 39 points 2 months ago

Yea, it did the exact fuckin opposite. Like we knew it would.

[–] negativeyoda 35 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Economists have written the same article for years.

This is like that Onion school shooting article that just changes the location except they count how many years it's been since Reagan

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 34 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Reagan pushed Horse and sparrow economics. If you give the horses enough grain, eventually the sparrows will get to eat a little out of their shit.

[–] lettruthout 15 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but even "eventually" didn't come.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 months ago

Well duh, bank accounts aren't horses, you can always just add another 0 without overflow

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Of course it didn't work, but only because we didn't give it 150 more years! I promise guys, really, just 180 more years and it will slightly trickle down! It's been scientifamicbly proven that in just 230 more years it will absolutely start to work!

-Study paid for by the fuck you I got mine, but I want yours too foundation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Allonzee 28 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

And they used that money as a cudgel to make political bribery perfectly legal in Citizens United, as if it wasn't already rampant. They own this fucking place above board now.

We get a vote on how to, or if we even should address the social issue symptoms of our oligarch class rigging the economic game, ie who to blame or what to spend on the ever dwindling crumbs left for the Commons.

We don't get a vote on the economy itself, that's above our paygrade. From Pelosi to McConnell, "herp derp the free market we're bribed to rig for capital is working just fine... For our portfolios! 🤣"

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Because the plan all along is generational theft.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago

It's all the generations getting robbed, it's just that each successive generation gets shafted worse than the one before. Grandma didn't steal your retirement, the oligarchs did.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 2 months ago

Almost like this was the plan all along. The wealthy looking after their own interests to their benefit.

[–] simplejack 22 points 2 months ago (7 children)

Every couple years, another study that shows the same thing. The rich got richer and the middle class and poor lost.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] Maggoty 20 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Is this going to be like UBI studies, where the news pretends every one of hundreds of studies is the one that is breaking this news for the first time? My economics professor was taking the piss out of supply side economics over a decade ago.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] toiletobserver 20 points 2 months ago

Economics: explaining tomorrow why the predictions of yesterday didn't come true today

[–] bitjunkie 16 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Yeah, no shit. Something anyone remotely educated on the topic has known since the policies went into place. The problem isn't that the information wasn't there, it's that no one with enough power to benefit from it is willing to do anything about it.

[–] aesthelete 16 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

It's by design. But in a serious country, serious world, or amongst serious people, we would've been laughing at the "Laffer curve" the moment Laffer ejaculated it into the napkin he first wet dreamed it upon.

But instead because we're both as laughable as the curve itself and because the rich, industrial asshats in this country were foaming at the mouth for a thin, arguably objective, seemingly mathematical piece of horseshit to cover their "steal from the poor and give to the rich" policy preferences, reproductions of Arthur's ejaculate was disseminated like it was the fucking Mona Lisa.

It should never be said that conservatives are conservative in the normal, adjective sense of the word. For the last fifty years, they've been tearing at the fraying seams of society and have been using "trickle down economics" as their seam ripper, while simultaneously blaming anything and everything other than their objectively horrific policies for the havoc wreaked.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Gammelfisch 16 points 1 month ago

Indeed, Ronnie was and still is a big POS in my book. The USA should bring the tax brackets from the 1960's back.

[–] Burn_The_Right 15 points 1 month ago

It's almost like every word a conservative (and neoliberal) says is deception or manipulation.

This cannot be solved peacefully.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 2 months ago

"Trickle down economics"

They're literally saying, "we're pissing on you."

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That just sounds like regular corruption ?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MehBlah 14 points 1 month ago

We know, we know.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

Shocked. I am shocked to the core.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago

What do you mean, corporations that have a legal obligation to maximize value for shareholders weren't passing money on to consumers out of the goodness of their hearts? Nobody could have seen that coming! /S

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (3 children)

We need to stop shaming people for believing in religion and start shaming them for believing in trickle down.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'll never understand how this image wasn't ridiculed from the start. I mean if you are talking about "trickling down", wouldn't the bottom be the place where the thing that is trickling down collects?

Of course money trickles down, it trickles down from the poor to rich.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Itdidnttrickledown 12 points 2 months ago

hear, hear OP. I can attest that dipshit started us on the path to the worst timeline.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 months ago

#1 reason the country is a shit hole.

[–] Surp 10 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

People should be always taxed more depending on how much more they make starting at 500,000$ a year for a single person imo. Once you hit that threshold you're far above a normal human....far above.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 8 points 2 months ago

That's what happens when you don't set an upper limit for wealth

[–] JeeBaiChow 8 points 1 month ago

Lol. Put entertainment people in charge of the economy again. Has the public even seen how they cook the books in that industry?

load more comments
view more: next ›