this post was submitted on 02 Aug 2024
464 points (96.8% liked)

politics

19229 readers
2989 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ghostalmedia 167 points 4 months ago (1 children)

This woman is fucking weird.

[–] kn33 49 points 4 months ago

Yeah, why's she thinking about other people's junk so much? Weirdo.

[–] Sanctus 145 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Its 2024. Only fucking assholes think this language is acceptable.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I don't think I've heard that word out loud in over ten years and the last person I heard say it was a gay man. I've run into some pretty shitty people in that time frame, yet none of them managed to use it. That's really bizarre.

[–] shiroininja 27 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I got called it the other day when I put my hair up in a bun. And earlier that day I had coworkers say “he’s a man!” When I came in with my hair up and they didn’t realize yet that I didn’t cut it. Welcome to SW Virginia

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Damn, I'm sorry. The fact that people like this are still around is baffling. I moved to Indiana about two years ago, and I've found many folks out here to be pretty backward, but not that good damn backward.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Red_October 17 points 4 months ago

They are however also trying to lock down the asshole vote.

[–] Cryophilia 92 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

It's fucking hilarious when someone named "Gómez" tries to simp for republican nazis.

It's like, honey, you may not be the first one on the train, but they got a seat for you lol

[–] razorwiregoatlick 31 points 4 months ago (2 children)

This right here. Anyone who is a Republican but not a billionaire is just putting off their own demise. Once they have taken everything from minorities they will come for the rest.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is however a classic trope. Being "one of the good ones," affords certain privileges until is doesn't. It is also absolutely a despicable card to play.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Raiderkev 15 points 4 months ago

This is what I tell my Jewish Republican friend. Like bro, what do you think they mean when they ramble about George Soros?

[–] SkyezOpen 15 points 4 months ago (2 children)

There's a surprising amount of Latin American trump supporters. They're either naturalized or children of naturalized citizens who get mad at undocumented immigrants for not doing it "the right way" so his rhetoric appeals to them in that regard at least.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 4 months ago

I’m Mexican, my fuckin’ family is full of them. It is disgusting and a disgrace to my grandparents who immigrated here in the early 1900s. My grandpa was a union carpenter as well. It’s like spitting on their graves for their children to call themselves conservatives.

[–] fukurthumz420 11 points 4 months ago

that's what Catholicism and lack of education gets you. destroy all religion for the sake of humanity.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 80 points 4 months ago

Hatefulness is simply exhausting. It’s not a trait I want in the people around me, much less in my government.

[–] [email protected] 40 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Oh, apparently this is the shithead who did a promo literally burning books. Fashy fash bigot shit.

[–] Ensign_Crab 18 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

"Where they burn books, they will, in the end, burn human beings too." - Heinrich Heine

"Promise?" - Republicans

[–] GladiusB 9 points 4 months ago

Pathetic. Fully aware that the pageantry is part of the allure to the incels and plays into it because she can't get it any other way.

[–] billiam0202 40 points 4 months ago

Someone's trying real hard to prove she shouldn't be in any of the groups her political party wants to purge.

[–] iAvicenna 39 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I would bet money that she also takes part in lesbian orgies

[–] captainlezbian 20 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Listen, we may have bad taste in women but standards can only go so low. I bet she goes bobbing for mussels in the hopes she gets invited to lesbian orgies

Edit: ok she looks like someone who your lesbian prostitute friend says managed to be the worst lay of her week despite being the only woman.

[–] morphballganon 13 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Doubtful. Lesbians are cool. She'd see that if she hung out with them.

I wonder if she was one of the kids at Epstein's island.

[–] IphtashuFitz 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A number of years ago while helping to build a theater set I was introduced to two self-professed “lesbians with power tools”. I still chuckle when I think about them introducing themselves that way.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 37 points 4 months ago

We now know, beyond a reasonable doubt, that this fine lady munches ham-wallet all damn day.

Cheers!

[–] elbarto777 34 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's so weird that Republican candidates are so obsessed with a harmless group of people who all they want is to love whom they want.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 4 months ago (10 children)

Sometimes, there are valid arguments regarding transgender matters. For example, someone that has medically-induced higher levels of testosterone might have a resulting advantage in aggressive sports. I don't know if that's true or not, but it's at least worth discussing it openly and honestly. What I find odd though is that the people that make transgender matters in sports their main issue say they do it for fairness, especially in support of women. However, these same people tend to have misogynistic views everywhere else in politics, so I'm supposed to accept that this one particular thing is where they finally started caring about equality?? It just seems so inauthentic.

My sister is one of these people. She's suddenly all about equality in sports. What?! When has she ever cared about anything or anyone besides herself and her kids as an extension?? When has she cared about fairness?? It's so uncharacteristic of her to think that way, that I have trouble believing anything she has to say on the matter.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 4 months ago

It makes sense if you don't believe them when they say it's about fairness.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 4 months ago (1 children)

and the GOprojection continues...

i havent seen a lot of mainstream articles pointing out the obvious, 'most conservatives incapable of defining fascism'

not that a lot of non-conservatives can either, but they arent the projectionists attempting to sway opinion.

[–] Kolrami 37 points 4 months ago (3 children)

This isn't projection. They're not saying "fascists".

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago

ha, oh damn! i gave them way more credit than they deserve. thanks!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nifty 27 points 4 months ago (11 children)

Khelif is an athlete who trained for years to perfect her skills and talent. Khelifs skill gave her the honor of representing her country at an international level at the Olympics.

This MAGA lady, whose name I won’t even bother looking up, doesn’t really bring much to the table in terms of skill, talent or vision. This maga lady isn’t even the best sexist out there and is just riding on the coattails of better, smarter or more accomplished bigots. Why do people give losers like this lady any attention at all?

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 4 months ago

I watched the Khelif vs Carini fight and nothing seemed out of the ordinary. I'm an actual fan of women's combat sports and I've seen them kick each other in the head way harder than anything in that match. Khelif had faster hands and better positioning. She earned the win.

I'm related to several collegiate level women athletes and none of them give a shit about trans women in sports. I've never met a trans woman who'd even come close to competing with them.

The people who are most concerned about keeping trans women from competing don't even watch women's sports. Hell, I doubt they even bothered to watch the 45 second fight yet have all kinds of opinions about it.

[–] randon31415 21 points 4 months ago (4 children)

Fat tits? Is that some slag I as a old person don't get?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] RampantParanoia2365 19 points 4 months ago

....are you serious? She implied physical gun violence against gay churches, and you're fucking worried about the bad word she used?

[–] [email protected] 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Legit my first thought for the censored word was "facists" and I thought "ah, just another day of the 'i know you are but what am i' game"

then I figured it out and now I'm just sad

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 4 months ago

Oh no! Who could have ever thought a MAGA candidate would have those views?

[–] Zannsolo 14 points 4 months ago

Republican candidate, stop minimizing Republican blame for these candidates.

[–] aseriesoftubes 14 points 4 months ago

I knew it would be this lady before I even clicked the link. She’s not just a GOP weirdo—she’s a fucking loon. Like deranged enough that she’s going to hurt somebody.

[–] ZILtoid1991 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

"because before if a man hit a woman, it used to land him in jail"

So she also virtue signals about being against "domestic abuse". I bet the very moment they no longer need to hide it, Project 2025 will suddenly also involve the allowing of "abuse of wives by their husbands, as a treat, if the husband is justifiably angry on that day at anything".

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ATDA 13 points 4 months ago

All fair Cunt.

[–] Snapz 13 points 4 months ago

Yep... That's about where we are in the timeline.

Your grandma and aunt in Ohio and Pennsylvania fucking suck. You need to put parental locks on their TV and internet...

load more comments
view more: next ›