Kolrami

joined 1 year ago
[–] Kolrami 7 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

~~DON'T FORGET.
YOU'RE~~ HERE
~~FOREVER.~~

[–] Kolrami 35 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

The answer is probably "yes"

  1. Food is probably worse.
  2. Your taste buds might have changed.
  3. Your gut bacteria might be different.

I have a couple reasons for believing each.

  1. Nutrient concentration in food has decreased over time (Veritasium talked about a fascinating explanation for this) and the desire to find low cost alternatives like HFCS over cane sugar changes the taste of food.
  2. "Children prefer higher levels of sweet and are more sensitive to bitter tastes until adolescence."
  3. Your gut microbiome literally changes over time.
[–] Kolrami 3 points 1 week ago

Smallville very directly addressed this in an episode where Clark Kent's mom got mad at him for hiding an undocumented immigrant on their farm. He had to remind her his own paperwork was also less than legitimate.

[–] Kolrami 2 points 1 week ago

None of this makes sense anymore. How could people possibly be shocked this time? It happened before under less favorable circumstances.

[–] Kolrami 6 points 1 week ago (3 children)

He probably didn't. He was polling very well. Very well. Better than his last two elections for a long time. People pretended he couldn't win and I admittedly didn't think they'd do that since that's exactly what happened in 2016.

Simply assuming the election was stolen will be a mistake because that mindset will help Republicans win their next election. The voters wanted an irreparably changed supreme court and Trump functionally immune from prosecution and that's what the voters got.

[–] Kolrami 6 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

You're right, but I think it was a combo.

October 7th spilled a bunch of gasoline on the ground. (Almost immediately after that day his polling trailed Trump's.)

His debate performance dropped a lit cigarette.

In my opinion, you really needed both of those things for him to drop out. A physically struggling Biden that's polling at 60% would've stayed in the race. A Biden with an excellent debate performance that was polling at 45% would've stayed in the race.

EDIT: typo

[–] Kolrami 23 points 2 weeks ago

People keep saying this but they haven't finished counting the votes. In California alone only 55% of votes were counted and he had 4,000,000+ votes there. The remaining votes could easily put him past his 2020 total.

[–] Kolrami 1 points 2 weeks ago

They're not done counting. There's a decent chance he has more votes this time.

[–] Kolrami 2 points 3 weeks ago

According to Forbes, Musk is currently #1 and Arnault is #4.

https://www.forbes.com/real-time-billionaires/#e5af4633d788

[–] Kolrami -5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Based on the article, that's very clearly what they want.

EDIT: anyone who's downvoting me should try explaining why the Democratic mayor of a Muslim majority town that hates pride flags is endorsing Trump. Some people clearly don't mind if Trump wins.

[–] Kolrami 8 points 1 month ago

I rewatched it when Disney+ rolled out. The first few episodes definitely hold up. Something like the first 4 or so episodes were all part of one really solid story arc. I think I stopped watching somewhere after season 1 though.

[–] Kolrami 9 points 1 month ago

This doesn't make sense. How could the "Abandon Harris" movement start late last year when Harris wasn't even the candidate?

view more: next ›