this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2024
186 points (93.5% liked)

News

25185 readers
4214 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Archive link

A California police department wants to be the first agency to have a law enforcement-branded Cybertruck, according to an internal email obtained by 404 Media.

The email Sergeant Jacob Gallacher, of the Anaheim Police Department, sent in early February read “P.S. I spoke with the Chief yesterday and we still want to be the first police agency to have a Cybertruck. If anyone can make that happen, I know it is you!” Gallacher sent the email to James Hedland from UP.FIT, a company that sells modified Teslas for use by law enforcement. The email was part of a conversation about the department’s use of Teslas.

Gallacher later told 404 Media that the email was something of “a joke,” but reaffirmed the agency’s wish to obtain a Cybertruck before other agencies, even if more for “community engagement” than using it as a patrol vehicle.

“We would, but it’s not necessarily from a patrol perspective,” Gallacher said. 404 Media obtained the email through a public records request.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 131 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (4 children)

Yes, we need the least functional, least capable, most failure prone, most brutalist vehicle possible. For community engagement.

EDIT: Also the most dangerous to both occupants and especially pedestrians.

[–] MehBlah 37 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Its just like the cars they drew when they were in grade school.

[–] thesohoriots 21 points 7 months ago

With the very crayons they ate

[–] BleatingZombie 6 points 7 months ago

You're talking as if they were ever able to graduate elementary school. The last time I saw police near an elementary school they were too scared to go in

[–] shalafi 24 points 7 months ago (4 children)

community engagement

OK, I'll argue for the cops on this one. Just this once!

Community engagement is a real thing, gets people talking to cops who otherwise wouldn't. And that can be a positive experience all around.

For example; The Tulsa cops had a bitchin' (my 80s coming out) Corvette Stingray they showed off at the fair and every other chance they had. They had quite an audience gathered around, talking about the car at first and then asking questions about LE.

Idea being, it's not supposed to be a regular cruiser.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (2 children)

At least Stingrays look good, I don't think anyone's gonna be crowding around a cybertruck asking about it's specs

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

The YouTube channel Throttle House did a road trip with the cybertruck and they found that a lot of people actually were curious about it.

https://youtu.be/xNE-NyaYBcg?si=1CS2DxHsocEYc0b- (around 24:15)

For all it's flaws, you can't deny it looks different from all the other cars around, and most people aren't online enough to have an opinion about Musk and his bullshit, so to them it's just an interesting looking car.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] pivot_root 3 points 7 months ago

You're forgetting the most important part of the Cybertruck for those in the club: danger to pedestrians and non-Cybertruck civilians.

[–] NOT_RICK 56 points 7 months ago (3 children)

These the same kind of cops that vote solidly republican because they “hate government waste”?

[–] [email protected] 46 points 7 months ago (2 children)

It's not hypocrisy when you understand that "waste" is conservative for "helps the poor and/or minorities"

[–] homesweethomeMrL 11 points 7 months ago

Also they have no shame. And, don’t know what hypocrisy means.

[–] cheese_greater 8 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Do ya one better:

waste

something that doesn't benefit me or doesn't solely benefit me

—conservatives

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Except that they love policies that only benefit rich people who don't care about them.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

"Devout Republicans"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Etterra 29 points 7 months ago

Just further proof of the idiocy of the average cop.

[–] dejected_warp_core 27 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I've always thought these looked like they belong in a science-fiction b-movie. With the blue paint and police lights on top, they really look like they're from a RoboCop knock-off film.

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I keep saying it looks like a fiberglass shell over an El Camino in an 80s post-apocalyptic film.

Then I found out about the movie Battletruck.

I almost think Elon is a fan...

[–] dejected_warp_core 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Exactly! Don't forget about Megaweapon:

And Space Mutiny:

And apparently I'm five years late to the party:

[–] FlyingSquid 6 points 7 months ago

Megaweapon! Megaweapon! Megaweapon!

[–] FanciestPants 25 points 7 months ago

Wouldn't criminals just wait to do crimes until it's raining?

[–] [email protected] 23 points 7 months ago

lol. We definitely need cop cars vulnerable to flipper zeros.

[–] dogslayeggs 23 points 7 months ago

The kind of person who actually wants a Cybertruck is definitely the kind of person who would be interesting in being a dickhead cop.

[–] Delusional 21 points 7 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't surprise me that cops want something that is ugly and tacky and completely unnecessary. And they'll use a shit ton of taxpayer money to get it too.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Part of being the police is advertising that there are police here, as a deterrent. This works well for that.

But another part is having fast, reliable vehicles able to out maneuver other cars on the road, to stop criminals after the fact. Not so good at that part.

[–] VanillaBean 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Eh chases aren’t that common. Most of the time police won’t pursue because it puts the public in more danger. Especially populated areas.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Idk about reliability, but electric cars can have crazy speed and acceleration.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

Sort of. EVs are very fast off the line, but generally very heavy. It might be good for handing out speeding tickets on a freeway, but a pursuit on surface streets would probably not go as well.

It's also a fairly tall EV. I bet if you slid into a curb or something, it'll roll like Peppy Hare.

Assuming the thing worked as advertised and they get a VERY steep discount, it might be a good idea?

[–] FlyingSquid 16 points 7 months ago
[–] BestTestInTheWest 16 points 7 months ago

Dubai police already have a cybertruck in service.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

ngl I'd pour water on it.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

How do you get away from a cyber truck? Spray it with water

[–] AnUnusualRelic 6 points 7 months ago (5 children)

Water balloons soon to be outlawed in California according to law enforcement source.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] Gradually_Adjusting 10 points 7 months ago (1 children)

I still think fondly on the time I saw a burning cop car during the BLM protests. That was a good day; Grateful for the promise of more to come.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Yeah, but then the cops tracked that person down by what SHIRT they were wearing.

[–] Gradually_Adjusting 9 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Amazing how good they are at solving crimes when they really apply themselves. Wouldn't it be wild if they did that for us?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago

We aren't part of the owning class, police will never care about the working class in this system.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Imagine the fingers that will be lost in the trunk and the heads that will be smacked into the steel roof until it just looks like the top of the doors are painted red.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Allonzee 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Im all for this.

Easier to elude the ~~police~~ capital defense force when they drive an attention seeking shitbox.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

Fast acceleration and low fuel use might be desirable characteristics for a police vehicle, but that seems like a kind of pricey vehicle to be used in a role that one expects wear-and-tear in.

thinks

Sometimes police need to sit in their car idle for a long time. If the traction battery in the Cybertruck can be used to drive accessories (like, if there's an inverter or something driven by the traction battery), that might be useful. My understanding is that a number of EVs don't permit for that, though.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (3 children)

The Cybertruck explicitly advertises its 120/240vac inverter for 'job site tools' and other similar uses; then voids your warranty if you actually use it 'while stationary'.

Here's Louis Rossmann ranting about it for a bit.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The Cybertruck explicitly advertises its 120/240vac inverter for ‘job site tools’ and other similar uses

Oh, that's nice.

then voids your warranty if you actually use it ‘while stationary’.

That's not.

Hmm. I wonder if it's because adding extra charge/discharge cycles eats into battery life, which is probably a major bound on the car's life.

considers

Honestly, if EVs don't have a way to read charge/discharge count in a way that's hard-for-potential-resellers-to-fiddle-with the way odometers are, they probably should, and EV sales should probably list that number the way cars do mileage today, as a measurement of "wear".

EDIT: And at least for the battery, the warranty should probably be on the number of charge/discharge cycles, not on the distance traveled.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Oh, most definitely. Tracking battery wear should 100% be standard practice, and considered when buying/selling used EVs.

I just find it interesting that Tesla tells you to do something, then ultimately punishes you for doing so.

If you're not supposed/allowed to use it as a stationary power station; don't advertise that use case as a selling point.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›