What I love about Blade Runner is the dead-simple use of literal atmosphere: rain, fog, hard lights, and hard shadows. It's always cold, rainy, humid, and it's hard to see. Every scene is just... uncomfortable yet it has this exotic beauty to it.
dejected_warp_core
Man, it's like Ridley Scott saw this gorgeous prop on set and said: "Okay, gimme one hard light over there and move it around until this thing looks really cool." You really can't see half of what's in the frame because it's obscured by the other half of the frame and the prop itself makes no sense... but somehow that doesn't matter: something important is happening.
With an all-digital display cluster in a conventional car, which is effectively just an LED screen, it's possible to hack something like this in. Getting a modern center console to cooperate would take some elbow-grease, but is also probably doable.
This, of course, is after the hygenist is done raking your gums with a prison shiv.
Yes, but only for the mere moments before it becomes porridge.
It's the sugars in those vegetables. It turns the pot into a bacterial growth medium. Given enough time, something is going to survive that environment. Maybe it'll be probiotic, but most likely, it won't.
where it was often necessary to render unruly guests blind.
(emphasis mine)
Blind?!
My guess is that hitchhiking+skateboarding means grabbing an actual moving trailer hitch or three. Were he manually kicking the pavement with zero assistance, I cannot imagine covering 55 miles a day without it being downhill the entire time. After all, it is F L A T after you cross the Rockies. For at least a thousand miles. That or he has legs like tree trunks.
You guys are getting a retirement?
Fuck that.
I strongly dislike how the argument hinges on the very movable goalpost of "illegal" drugs. It has this awful moralizing "protect the kids while we destroy privacy", vibe to it.
At first I though this would require an end-run on HIPAA, but all they really need to do is re-schedule a bunch of therapeutic drugs. Or ignore the FDA entirely and just enforce a ban by edict (somehow) through a different agency. I don't think we've ever seen federal agencies openly disagree like that before, but I think it's possible. Also: big pharma may have something to say about all this.
Like a lot of the nonsense coming from this cabinet, it'll test the crap out of state's rights.
Fine, then it's not a political party outright, and instead a lobby. Or a trade association. Or a big bunch of very angry like-minded voters. The point is that such a group could exert leverage within the DNC coalition as a voting block. We already have these for other interest groups. DNC membership is really only useful for voting in primaries to most people anyway - it doesn't have to signify allegiance or kow-towing to party power.
Ooh, a Boy Harsher reference in the wild. Nice.