lol!
homesweethomeMrL
But all the names are . . are real?
What's your unit of measurement there? I'm guessing whatever it is is "per year"?
How Cambridge converted those tiny bits of data into massive political wins has never before been made public. Its methods raise disturbing questions about how our personal data can be used to manipulate us.
Looking forward to this read.
How uh . . . how real is . . this.
I think you’re supposed to support your thesis first.
Ach! They're the People's Front of Judea! FFS. Judean People's Front. *scoff*
Aw how is ol' Grimey?
Wow "a report" huh? Damn Guardian you guys just got your finger on the pulse there don't ya.
He barfs out these demented ramblings that get slurped up by corporate news sewers and now it's in the headlines like it was ever anything more than a misfiring syphilitic group of neurons in front of a microphone.
What's "cope"? Actually, what are we arguing about? I don't disagree that those things are true.
I do disagree that countries can be "good" or "bad" without any other qualifiers such as "at healing the sick" or something. I also disagree that something (or someone) can be only all-good or all-bad, which is the only phrasing you're using even though you probably also don't think someone can be all-good or all-bad.
"If we're counting colonial times" is also interesting - what, like Jamestown counts as America? or the original 13 colonies? That seems a little bogus as they didn't even have cybertrucks or toxic waste then.