this post was submitted on 31 Jan 2025
514 points (98.5% liked)

politics

19631 readers
3816 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

During his Senate confirmation hearing for Health and Human Services Secretary, Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed scientific evidence on vaccine safety despite claiming he would follow the data.

He rejected studies debunking vaccine-autism links, downplayed COVID-19 vaccine effectiveness, and avoided endorsing the HPV vaccine.

His remarks on racial differences in vaccination raised further concerns.

Lawmakers and health experts criticized his reliance on flawed research, warning his leadership could erode public trust and revive preventable diseases.

His confirmation remains contentious.

all 41 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 800XL 12 points 17 hours ago

Of course he denied it. He's a fucking moron.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 20 hours ago

contentious?! Im so sick of these options that could not be worse if someone were raised and trained to be as crap at a job as possible.

[–] Sanctus 92 points 1 day ago

Don't forget, he killed a bunch of Samoan kids with an anti vaccine campaign in the region in 2018-19 and then just left without consequence. He is going to do this here.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 day ago
[–] cabron_offsets 167 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Might have something to do with the glaring fact that he is mentally defective and completely untrained in anything related to science or medicine.

[–] zib 57 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Could also be the worm eating his brain.

[–] MeatPilot 64 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Footage from inside RFK Jr's head.

[–] SkunkWorkz 11 points 1 day ago
[–] satans_methpipe 2 points 16 hours ago

I agree that he is dimwitted and not fit to make decisions. In fact I think he needs 24/7 supervision by a competent adult. I disagree with your nomenclature 'mentally defective' though. He is incompetent, uneducated, a liar, an abuser, and has reduced mental capacity due to a brainworm and being a spoiled rich kid.

[–] SpacetimeMachine 2 points 17 hours ago

Could also be the thousands each week he was receiving from his anti-vaccine non profit.

[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I miss when we had actual leaders, and that includes a willingness to admit that you don’t know everything and defer to experts.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Hey, you know that Rand Paul guy? He was letting some air come out of his mouth yesterday. When he said we need an honest debate…

Bro, what makes you think you would be a part of an honest debate? You're not qualified.

[–] danc4498 10 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

the reason you have distrust from people at home and why they don’t believe anything you say and they don’t believe government at all is you’re telling my kid to take a Hepatitis B vaccine when he’s one day old. You get it through drug use and sexually transmitted. That’s how you get Hepatitis B, but you’re telling me my kid has to take it at one day old … that’s not science.

The “That’s not science” kills me. Just because you don’t understand the science doesn’t mean it isn’t science.

[–] idiomaddict 8 points 18 hours ago (1 children)

Also, if you can get it through sex and IV drug use, you can get it through blood contact, which can happen in other ways. Why not protect against it? In case kids decide to become “blood brothers” or practice insufficient hygiene around other kids’ bloody noses or something

[–] Whats_your_reasoning 4 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

Considering how long it can take kids to both use a tissue properly and dispose of it properly, that can happen within the first hour at a daycare center.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Ensign_Crab 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Hold on, now. They didn't specify which year. Might have meant January 19th 1981 🤷

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean the goal is just to convince the American public that they don't want healthcare because that's way easier than trying to do anything about our healthcare being fucked.

[–] brucethemoose 23 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Vaccines are gigantic cost savers. Even assuming most "tough it out," vaccines are massively cheaper than treating those who show up to the ER.

[–] Jhex 10 points 19 hours ago

That's only true if you are to save the person now ailed by a preventable disease.

The GOP couldn't care a little if a few million of the plebes die... They will get the vaccines and healthcare, it's the peasants that will suffer

[–] T00l_shed 6 points 1 day ago (1 children)

An ounce of prevention vs a pound of cure

[–] [email protected] 2 points 17 hours ago

Too bad, we’re selling cures not prevention.

[–] CitizenKong 2 points 1 day ago

Not to mention the immense costs to the corpos when their sla... I mean workers drop like flies.

[–] [email protected] 62 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

It needs to be presented by some schmuck in front of a computer saying "this is what they don't want you to know!" Then he'll believe it.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] _stranger_ 30 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

OP said schmucks, not long suffering journalists of impeccable integrity.

[–] [email protected] 45 points 1 day ago

Oh wow, who ever would have thought that republicans saying they want evidence is a fucking lie and they just wanted an excuse to do shitty things.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Robert F. Kennedy Jr. dismissed scientific evidence on vaccine safety despite claiming he would follow the data.

[–] MTK 17 points 1 day ago

What?! The science denier denied science?!

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 day ago

Classic republicunt. "Nu uh dat doesnt kount!"

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Just means he's perfect for the current gop and Maga people

[–] MutilationWave 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah he fits right in, but for fuck's sake think of the children.

I am officially middle aged now, that's the first time I've brought that old chestnut out without joking.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

And they keep wondering why birthrates are down

[–] T00l_shed 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)

That's why they want to stop Healthcare for women. Get rid of sex ed, because teens will have sex. Get rid of profilactics. All part of the plan.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

That and help keep the poor poor

[–] T00l_shed 3 points 1 day ago

Yup that too

[–] MutilationWave 3 points 1 day ago

As George Carlin put it so naked and simple-

"Live babies make dead soldiers"

[–] NABDad 11 points 1 day ago

A past boss of mine used to say, "Did God say so?"

However, in his case it wasn't because he denied science and believed that the Bible was the only "knowledge" you needed, but rather that he believed God was the only authority who could overrule him.

He was actually a generally rational person, but if you wanted to contradict him, you'd need a series of peer reviewed, repeatable, double-blind studies proving he was wrong. And even then, he'd probably want God to comment.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

When will they get that what they warn or worry about is exactly what Trump and his footmen want?