this post was submitted on 07 Nov 2024
470 points (98.0% liked)

politics

19243 readers
2220 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Project 2025, a manifesto supported by the conservative Heritage Foundation, calls for a ban on pornography, labeling its purveyors as criminals and advocating for strict penalties, including jail time for producers and registered sex offender status for educators distributing it.

The manifesto argues that porn lacks First Amendment protection, framing it as harmful and exploitative.

With a right-leaning Supreme Court, proponents aim to overturn existing protections established in Miller v. California, potentially impacting mainstream media.

Donald Trump has pledged to bring Project 2025 contributors onto his team.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Squorlple 217 points 1 month ago (4 children)

First president to make pictures of his current wife illegal

[–] [email protected] 90 points 1 month ago (1 children)

First president to have actual nude photos of his wife available.

If any other president, especially a Democrat, had nudes of their wife it would be a scandal.

But America is so beholden to these idiots that it doesn't even matter to anyone.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (4 children)

There are lots of things they do that're scandalous. That's not one of them. There's already enough puritanical bullshit fucking up the US. It's about time some of it were left in the past.

[–] SkunkWorkz 29 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Remember when the right had a meltdown over Michelle Obama’s bare arms.

[–] affiliate 20 points 1 month ago

isn’t that her second amendment right though?

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 153 points 1 month ago (2 children)

registered sex offender status for educators distributing it

If a book in your classroom or school library has anything beyond a heterosexual peck on the cheek, congratulations, you're now a sex offender. Not a joke.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Oh boy, I can't wait for abstinance to be taught as the only form of sexual education in America.

[–] Mirshe 61 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm expecting them to go even further, and just stop doing sex education period.

[–] AreaKode 27 points 1 month ago

When the schools close, I guess everybody has to go to Christian school now! No sex education at all, please!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Fredselfish 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well fuck as a published writer who has gsy characters in my books does that mean I will be labeled under this?

[–] Diplomjodler3 18 points 1 month ago

Absolutely. The handmaids will rip you to pieces in a public execution.

[–] Feathercrown 92 points 1 month ago (4 children)

I hope they actually do it. This is like the abortion issue, if they actually go through with it people will be like "What?? How could this happen??"

[–] Eatspancakes84 40 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And then 2 years pass, and they have completely who banned porn, and why it’s the mistake of Democrats.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Considering the countrybas a whole didn't learn from 2016, there is absolutely no way anything would change.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 87 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Historically speaking people have two things they riot for, safety and comfort. How that comfort manifest varies but pornography is definitely on the same level as whiskey, and the United states has had a rebellion on that.

[–] teamevil 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And somehow we just elected a guy who has no qualms with turning the military and the police on its own citizens despite legal doctrine.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Well luckily the military has a good chance of not listening to him, atleast in my opinion. The police on the other hand are more of a threat, though not an insurmountable one.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (3 children)

THE GOONER REBELLION, WOOOOO!

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 66 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The porn ban will just be the excuse they use to crack down on VPNs so they can implement a full on Chinese style internet censorship program.

[–] nexusband 19 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Goof luck for the companies depending on VPNs...but hey, Donnie's going to crash the economy anyway, so why fret.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 53 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Oh man do I ever hope they ban porn in the US. That would be fucking hilarious.

load more comments (13 replies)
[–] kat_angstrom 40 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Hilarious. As if this could ever actually be instituted nationwide. Regulations on sale and access maybe, but moral crusades like this are perpetually doomed to failure, much like the War on Drugs.

Doesn't mean they won't try, won't posture, won't grandstand about it, but to actually succeed in this goal when over 50% of the populace isn't going to be behind it? I guess we'll just have to watch them try.

[–] givesomefucks 89 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's not to try and ban porn

It's a way to snoop on all Internet traffic.

Like cops "smelling weed" anytime they want to hassle someone. If they don't like a person, they'll spy on their Internet usage, obviously find some kind of porn, and then make a public spectacle out of to distract from what they're mad at that person for.

They don't care about the crime, they want an excuse to investigate people they don't like.

Say something mean on twitter, and they'll search your IP till they find something they can call porn.

[–] WhatAmLemmy 34 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

They'll say they're gonna ban it and when there's uproar they'll say to "protect the kids" you need a digital ID to access porn. Then they'll expand it to everything, ban VPN's, encryption and there will be no more privacy. Big brother is watching, and if he deems you too woke, for whatever arbitrary reason, you're off to the gulag.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sadly people won't react before it's too late because " it will never happen here ! " and till then we think like that because "conspiration"

[–] billiam0202 17 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Every fascist takeover starts with "Oh, you're just overreacting."

Everyone, remember these six words:

HE SAID HE WAS GOING TO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] grue 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It's also the pretext for a pogrom against LGBTQ, whose existence in public will be redefined as "pornographic."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 19 points 1 month ago

It’s also a way to enforce ideological purity in education.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The war on drugs only failed if you truly believe its goal was getting rid of drugs.

To quote John Erlichman, one of its architects:

“The Nixon Campaign in 1968, and the Nixon White House after that, had two enemies: the antiwar Left, and Black people. You understand what I’m saying? We knew we couldn’t make it illegal to be either against the war or Black. But by getting the public to associate the hippies with marijuana and Blacks with heroin, and then criminalizing both heavily, we could disrupt those communities. We could arrest their leaders, raid their homes, break up their meetings and vilify them night after night on the evening news. Did we know we were lying about the drugs? Of course we did.”

By the strandards of what it was created to do, the war on drugs was fantastically successful.

The war on porn will be successful in exactly the same way, because Republicans have already spent decades redefining all LGBTQ content as "pornographic". This is will be a tool for disrupting queer and trans communities, for erasing queer and trans resources and tearing down queer and trans rights activists. Stopping porn isn't the point, and it never was.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 39 points 1 month ago

Do it.

Fuck around and find out.

The sad thing is, the nation will care more about porn than abortion rights. 🤦‍♂️

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Least important effect of a Trump presidency - but I'm sure if he did this it'd be the straw that broke the camel's back for Gen Z Trumpers.

[–] BassTurd 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The one thing this election has all but confirmed for me is that over half of the country supports these things unabashedly, and I highly doubt porn will be the hero that magically changes these people. It's already banned in multiple conservative states, and all of them just voted red again.

Honestly, I believe that if the Trump admin brought back prohibition, his bootlickers would be the first in line telling us how it's the best idea ever.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] billiam0202 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Violence against women is about to skyrocket when the incels can't get a date because they're too repulsive and can't watch porn to take out their sexual frustrations because of what they voted for.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago

Then maybe they should have known that Project 2025 called for that before they decided to vote for Trump.

Those kids would be very angry if they could read

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago

So? The president is a felon. Crime is legal.

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

We're back to 1920s. Mafia will bootleg porn from Mexico and Canada.

[–] Diplomjodler3 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And of course they will use it as an excuse to implement complete surveillance on all your devices.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Treczoks 25 points 1 month ago (4 children)

And again, the US totally failed to learn from history. This time, even their own history. Do you actually have history classes in school, or has this been replaced by "American" "football" or "Cheerleading" classes already?

Hint: I'm talking about 1920 to 1933, when organized crime in the US was thriving like mad due to a similar stupid idea. This time, it won't be any better. Keywords: Volstead Act and Cullen-Harrison Act

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Italy greets you with its piracy shield.

Can they actuate such measures? Of course they can, look at Italy. Is it realistic? Well, that depends on how stupid they are. Italy has blocked google trying to ban piracy and the "shield" is easily avoided with a vpn, but hey, they are trying.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 month ago

And also they accidentally blocked Cloudflare before Google

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

First, they came for the trans people* and I did nothing because I am not trans.
Then they came for the immigrants and I did nothing because I am not an immigrant.
Then they came for women's rights and I did nothing because I am not a woman.
Then they came for the... wait, what? Hold up!


* They came really hard for the trans people. Like strangely hard. Like they had some kind of fixation.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] paddirn 17 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Time to start stockpiling.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›