this post was submitted on 02 Sep 2024
482 points (98.8% liked)

News

22888 readers
4739 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Former U.S. President Donald Trump, who faces federal and state charges for allegedly trying to overturn his 2020 election loss to President Joe Biden, insists he had "every right" to interfere in the election.

"Whoever heard you get indicted for interfering with a presidential election where you have every right to do it?" Trump said in a Fox News interview that aired on Sunday.

A federal indictment accuses Trump of defrauding the United States by preventing Congress from certifying Biden's victory and depriving voters of their right to a fair election. He faced a revised federal indictment last month accusing him of illegally trying to overturn his 2020 election loss.

Trump faces similar charges in Fulton County, Georgia, where he was also charged with racketeering, which is used to target members of organized crime groups and carries a penalty of up to 20 years in prison.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] capt_wolf 176 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

So he's just blatantly admitting it now, huh?

[–] cheese_greater 57 points 2 weeks ago (2 children)

It must be incredibly exhausting lying all the time. The truth is easier

[–] [email protected] 77 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It's exhausting he never sees the consequences of it.

[–] VoterFrog 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well half the country either doesn't give a shit that he's doing it or are straight up happy about it. It's literally like watching Hitler rise to power.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When Trump won in 2016, it was only with about 27% of the votes from eligible voters across the country.

A lot of people don’t vote

[–] VoterFrog 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

So they don't give a shit that he's doing it.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

lol ok fine

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

It's only exhausting if you're trying to avoid getting caught in your lies. Trump doesn't care who knows he's lying.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 weeks ago

Why wouldn't he after being told he was allowed to do it by Supreme Court?

[–] [email protected] 92 points 2 weeks ago

Hey, FBI? Look! Over here. He’s doing it again.

[–] [email protected] 78 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

…and if I did, it wasn’t wrong.

[–] linearchaos 6 points 2 weeks ago

No, he's not that smooth. It's "and when I did" from the very beginning

[–] [email protected] 61 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Well, at least he's learnt his lesson and been suitably punished so he's definitely not going to do anything like that again.

Probably not really needed but /s...

[–] AbidanYre 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] Ersatz86 4 points 2 weeks ago

Ew.

Agreed. But even metaphorically, ew.

[–] eran_morad 49 points 2 weeks ago

Jack Smith:

[–] RampantParanoia2365 46 points 2 weeks ago

No one. No one "has heard" of it, because you're the first fucking person to do it, fuck wad.

[–] kikutwo 45 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Confession before his next guilty conviction.

[–] partial_accumen 36 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

"Your honor, I'd like to introduce into evidence Prosecutions Exhibit A, where the Defendant willfully admitted his crimes live on stage in front of hundreds of people."

[–] NJSpradlin 6 points 2 weeks ago

“Russia, if you’re listening…” he can say whatever he wants, no one cares. They’d rather complain about Kamala flip-flopping, which makes sense that she would change her stances to gather more support… or that she’s just a continuation of the current administration.

[–] njm1314 42 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

He's trying to frame this as an official presidential Act. Basically he's trying to go through the door the Supreme Court opened for him.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 1 points 2 weeks ago

A normal court would recognize that interfering with state elections isn’t part of his official duties.

But we don’t have a normal court.

[–] [email protected] 42 points 2 weeks ago

And he has every right to rot in jail

[–] vegeta 37 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

When you’re a dictator, they let you do it. You can do anything. Grab ’em by the polls. You can do anything.

-@RealDonaldTrump

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 weeks ago

Actually, "they" don't. Unless you have a really firm grip of the country, "they" will kill and replace you faster than Trump takes a dump.

[–] blattrules 37 points 2 weeks ago

Maybe we shouldn’t let him get away with everything he does.

[–] [email protected] 35 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

ah. the ole sovoreign citizen president defense.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago

ah. the ole sovoreign ~~citizen~~ president defense.

Just wants to be king.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 weeks ago

Soooooo… this is an admission of guilt, right?

[–] APassenger 24 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

This could have been in trial by now is not for the misbehavior in the DA's office. This was far too important to go mixing relationships with I dunno... Democracy?

[–] themeatbridge 5 points 2 weeks ago

They would have found another way to stall. Really this should have gone to trial before the primaries even began, but then Trump wouldn't have been the nominee.

[–] Bonesince1997 15 points 2 weeks ago

No law. No order. Got it.

[–] jordanlund 14 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Anything you say can, and will, be used against you.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 weeks ago

if only 😐

[–] halcyoncmdr 13 points 2 weeks ago

They probably got a heads up about something new in a case and are trying to get ahead of it with their base. Since we know the MAGA cultists don't consider time to be linear. The past can be in any order they want at the time. It's all just the past.

[–] TheWorldRolledMe 11 points 2 weeks ago

Can someone remind us what stage this is? Something like "if I did do it, they deserved it" I think

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 weeks ago

Well there you go, bake him away toys!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Doesn't the SCOTUS agree with him? Or did I misunderstand those clowns?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

It seems he is claiming he interfered with the election as an official action, so it checks out...

[–] [email protected] 21 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Except.... the executive branch has no role in elections. It cannot be an official action.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 weeks ago

Sure it can, you just need to buy yourself a few Supreme Court Justices. They go cheap these days!

[–] NegativeLookBehind 9 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

Is this not an admission of a fucking federal crime?

[–] Freefall 4 points 2 weeks ago

The line I have been hearing, and I don't like repeating it but you gotta know the talking points to counter them, is "he said he had every right to, but wouldn't stoop to the lows the dems would so he never acted on it".

It is stupid, but that is their logic/defense from what I am hearing....sad and weird.

[–] uberdroog 6 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

Is it not interference just by announcing my candidacy? Is it not interference to just exist? There are only two states of being. Black and white. On and off. Ones and zeros. We either accept all things are interference or nothing is. I mean unless it's democrats and then it's definitely interference and must be stopped at all cost because socialism. ;)

[–] vaquedoso 6 points 2 weeks ago

Infallible logic. Have you considered becoming president?

[–] xc2215x 4 points 2 weeks ago

He did not.

[–] poo 3 points 2 weeks ago

Cool. Then Thomas Crooks had every right to try to blow Trump's brains out.