themeatbridge

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] themeatbridge 1 points 1 minute ago

It is, but forex markets allow traders to trade on significant margin. Meaning, if I have $100, I might be able to buy $1,000 worth of foreign currency (a 1:10 margin) and if the value of the currency increases 1% ($100) you get 10% of the profit, which is 10% of your investment. If the position increases by 10%, you double your money. However, this also means that if the value drops by 10%, your money is gone.

Now consider that forex traders often leverage at 1:500 margins. You get to buy massive positions with currency pairs, and even the tiniest fluctuations can provide massive profits or instantaneous ruin.

The algorithm I used monitored recurring micro-patterns, watching for predictable movements. You're also watching relative value pairs, rather than just an absolute market value. Both sides of a currency pair have nations vying to improve the value of their own currency, so you can make money (or lose money) on either side of the pair. Dollar is low against the yen, buy dollars with yen. Yen drops against the dollar, sell your positions. Euro drops against the yen, go pick up Euros agains the yen, and feel confident that Japan is already trying to strengthen the yen (simplified example, because it's way more complex than that).

So if you track currencies across all currency pairs, you can find inconsistencies. I called it "torque" 15 years ago, but I'm sure a proper forex trader can give you an actual name for it. These are areas where three or more currencies are out of alignment, like if the dollar is up against the yen but down against the euro, and the yen is up against the euro. These are situations where you would expect the market to equalize in one direction or the other, and the trick was being able to predict which way it would go.

And I thought I had figured that out. I had not figured that out. I had gotten lucky several times in a row.

[–] themeatbridge 14 points 11 hours ago

"For now" as though they are ever going to grow a conscience.

[–] themeatbridge 9 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Just to tack on to all of your points, there are also different energy efficiency requirements for commercial and residential buildings. R-values on walls and windows are lower in commercial spaces (for a variety of legitimate and debatable reasons) which is why office buildings can have floor to ceiling aluminum windows while residential buildings generally have more opaque walls. Insulation requirements between units, between floors, and for mechanical rooms are also lower in commercial spaces.

Some office buildings cannot become residential spaces at all.

[–] themeatbridge 13 points 17 hours ago

That's per person, double occupancy. Going alone is $64k.

But it does include meals, housekeeping biweekly, port fees and taxes, and all the amenities on the ship. Honestly not bad, if you can sell your house and downsize into a suitcase.

[–] themeatbridge 7 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

It hurt with fake money, because I thought I had discovered some big secret key. Like that movie Pi. And then it was gone. All the sucess, all the dreams of a 9-screen batcave-style computer station with financial tickers and shit. I realized that I had nothing, and I was foolish for thinking otherwise. Stung like a bitch.

But you're right, safe investments are the smarter long-term play. I did make an extra paycheck on dogecoin once on a moonshot. But otherwise, my boring retirement funds are all steadily beating inflation by a few percentage points. Why fight the tide?

[–] themeatbridge 44 points 21 hours ago (7 children)

Reminds me of the time I started learning about forex. I used a practice account to test an algorithm for recognizing short-term trends and trading on the activity. I ran a simulation for a few days to make sure it was working, and my fake $10,000 bankroll turned into $50,000 in less than a week. I was excited about the results, and went to explain it to someone with deeper pockets who might actually have $10k to invest, and in the time it took me to walk from my desk to his and back, it went to less than $600. Five minutes, $50k wiped out.

Needless to say, he didn't invest and I stopped daydreaming about owning a yacht. Forex is gambling.

[–] themeatbridge 39 points 22 hours ago (3 children)

Boring is fine. I don't need my phone to be exciting.

The headline should have been about reliability. The author had to replace the first demo device, and experienced stuttering on the replacement. Will HMD continue to support the device and outfits? Will the maker community adopt the device and start getting creative with the options? Or will this end up in the drawer of abandoned hardware with the minidisc player and active 3d glasses.

Modularity and flexibility is great. Boring is acceptable. Unreliable is not OK.

[–] themeatbridge 20 points 22 hours ago

Funny and factually correct.

[–] themeatbridge 8 points 1 day ago

Predicting the results of the feasibility study:

  • Is it feasible?
    Fuck no.
[–] themeatbridge 52 points 1 day ago (3 children)

The goal is to make it illegal for trans folks to exist at all. Next, they'll come for the entire LGBTQ+ community. Then probably the atheists.

[–] themeatbridge 103 points 1 day ago (6 children)

Mace is a Republican, so I can understand why she might assume all members of congress as sex predators. Think about the people she surrounds herself with. She must be terrified, poor thing.

Doesn't excuse bigotry at all. The bill is hatred on paper.

[–] themeatbridge 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (53 children)

The bigger problem is that lose should rhyme with pose or close. Loose is fine.

 

“Tonight, Missouri lynched another innocent Black man,” NAACP President Derrick Johnson said in a statement.

285
I met Tim Walz at an event (self.truthabouttimwalz)
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by themeatbridge to c/truthabouttimwalz
 

That man shook my hand, looked me straight in the eye, and said with a smile, "It's really nice to meet you." I am, in fact, incredibly unpleasant. WHAT ELSE IS HE LYING ABOUT?!

 

Look, we're obviously not the best team. We have significant flaws, and Embiid cannot carry this team by himself.

But how can you not be hyped after watching Batum raining threes and Tobias on the bench? Embiid took his time getting it together, but he got it done when it mattered.

We can beat the Knicks. We can beat anybody if we play our best.

Maybe we don't. Maybe we lose again and everybody starts thinking about next year.

But we are still in this. The Philadelphia 76ers still have a chance to show the world what they can do as a team. So let's get hyped and enjoy the ride!

 

I heard someone say this in a video recipe, followed by way more cheese than you should eat at once. It occurred to me that the phrase means ample, not nutritious.

 

Basically title. I'm curious how others are watch the game. I cut cable a long time ago, and have Hulu live for this season, but it's just awful. Their app sucks, the unskippable ads are all over the place, and tonight it started recording at 4:30.

So what is everyone else using?

 

Has this ever happened to you? There's a fly in the house, buzzing around you, so you go to the cabinet to get the swatter. But as soon as you start wielding it, the little bastard disappears. You set it down, and now he's back, taunting you.

Ok so obviously flies don't taunt, but do they have the capacity to recognize, even instinctually, that I'm holding a deadly weapon?

1
submitted 1 year ago by themeatbridge to c/sixers
 

Anybody else want to see all five on the court together and just have them make a giant wall around the paint? No? Alright, me neither then.

So what the fuck is Morey doing?

view more: next ›