this post was submitted on 26 Sep 2023
323 points (96.5% liked)

politics

19100 readers
3449 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 202 points 1 year ago (8 children)

18 U.S.C. § 922(d)(1) makes it a federal crime to sell a firearm to a person who is under felony indictment.

And 18 U.S.C. § 922(n) makes it a federal crime for a person under indictment to ship or transport a firearm.

[–] worldwidewave 106 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Oh the irony if Trump and Hunter Biden both caught gun charges

[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But cool part would be if Hunters charge was deemed unconstitutional but Trump’s was upheld.

[–] Alteon 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If Hunter is charged, then Trump should be as well. If Hunter is dropped, then Trump's should be as well.

I thought there was supposed to be a Statute of Limitations issue on the Hunter case, but still....fairs fair.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As I understand it, Hunter didn't answer the question correctly on his gun purchase. Not checking the box on drug use. Though this is against the law, a district court's already deemed it unconstitutional.

Trumps is a straight federal code violation.

[–] Alteon 13 points 1 year ago

Good point. Thanks for the correction.

[–] thesprongler 26 points 1 year ago

Different situations completely. Hunter did not accurately fill out a form. Trump is under federal indictment.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TwoGems 6 points 1 year ago

No that's not how it works. You see, the milquetoast AG Garland has to look non-political by actually being political and not charging Trump, but only charging Hunter Biden.

[–] takeda 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

What chance is that he did it on purpose?

To upset democrats (because the case against Hunter), but also to rile up Republicans that "democrats are taking our guns away".

We never heard about him buying gun, when he could do so legally. He also doesn't give impression like he cares about guns at all.

[–] RojoSanIchiban 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Zero. He's not that calculating. He's a moron that instinctually manipulates and cons people through his incessant narcissism only in the present.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago

He’s like a young Anakin Skywalker in The Phantom Menace flying a fighter for the first time. “I‘ll try spinning, that’s a good trick!” Except it’s whatever nonsense his amphetamine fueled brain latched onto most recently. And his base licks it up over and over. The media talks about him like he’s some master manipulator. He’s just a dog chasing a car that keeps catching the car because the fucking car keeps stopping for him to catch it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Doesn't matter if it's on purpose. Its the law.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 102 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Trump commits another federal felony live on national TV to prove that he's still completely above the law.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 84 points 1 year ago (1 children)

“President Trump buys a @GLOCKInc in South Carolina!” his spokesman, Steven Cheung, wrote in his post. (on Twitter)

A salesperson at the Summerville location, who declined to give her name or answer additional questions, said Mr. Trump had not bought a gun.

Whaaaaa???!? A Trump lie?!?!?

The most pathetic thing is that people still fall for his bullshit.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago

Or the business is trying to CYA

[–] assassin_aragorn 61 points 1 year ago

That guy in the middle of fifth avenue is sweating now

[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 year ago (5 children)

In case you're wondering why Trump chose this particular gun store:

A lot of the media has focused on whether Trump actually purchased a gun and violated the law, but less attention has been paid to Trump’s decision to visit Palmetto State Armory, as opposed to any other gun store in South Carolina.
In late August, a white man opened fire in a Dollar General store in a predominantly Black Jacksonville neighborhood, killing three people, all of whom were Black. The shooter, who then killed himself, used a Glock handgun and an AR-15 semiautomatic rifle, at least one of which was painted with a swastika. Jacksonville Sheriff T.K. Waters said the shooter “hated Black people” and acted alone.
At least one of the guns came from Palmetto State Armory, a store in Summerville, South Carolina. The Jacksonville sheriff’s office shared photos of the firearms used in the attack on its Facebook page. One of the guns is clearly engraved with the Palmetto State Armory logo. The shooter had also drawn swastikas on the gun.
When the Jacksonville shooting happened, Trump did not issue any statement on the tragedy. But you could argue that this campaign stop is a kind of tacit statement. He put the spotlight on Palmetto State Armory, praised its inventory, and tried to offer it business.
Palmetto State Armory has openly embraced far-right ideology. In 2020, it began marketing its products using imagery and language associated with the “boogaloo,” slang for racist violence and even a call for full-on race war. It has also come to mean war to topple the government.
https://www.yahoo.com/news/sick-racist-message-behind-why-160041585.html

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They sell cheap shit, lots of right-wing graphics, and you should use a disposable credit card if you shop with them. They sell a huge amount of firearms though, so I really doubt Trump went there as a nod to the racist shooter. They are just a big-ass, well-known firearms supplier.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] NOPper 28 points 1 year ago

"Went for a European model eh? Looks a lil' woke to me..."

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (5 children)

He has no idea how to hold a pistol does he

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Saw a pic of him in a car with his arm out the window, pointing it at the camera, with his finger on the god damn trigger. If that thing was loaded he was a speed bump away from re-enacting the "Oh man, I shot Marvin in the face" scene. What a fucking tool.

[–] takeda 12 points 1 year ago

I was looking for it and found picture that looks like what you described, but I believe it was Photoshop of this one

[–] dhork 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And then there would be a press conference afterwards, with Marvin apologizing for getting in the way of the bullet and still supporting not only Trump's candidacy, but his God given right to discharge firearms anywhere and everywhere.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Son_of_dad 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I can't even imagine him with a gun, I doubt he likes them. But his base does. He wanted them as decor cause they had his face

[–] Fondots 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

FWIW, trump was known to have a carry permit in NYC, which is nearly impossible for the average citizen to get, and it should be no surprise that there were allegations that he wasn't properly vetted for it and there were some shady favors going in in the background in order for him to get it. Whether he ever actually ever carried is up for debate, although he claimed to, because he "likes to be unpredictable" but of course that's his words, so who's to say what they're worth.

His sons were also known to go on big game trophy hunting trips to Africa, so there's definitely some ammount of Trump family gun culture, although I vaguely remember seeing an article that I'm too lazy to track down now where Trump said he didn't really see the appeal of hunting, so who knows how much trump ever thought about guns.

I agree he was probably only interested in this one because it had his face on it.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Maybe he plans to kill himself when things get difficult.

[–] Boddhisatva 14 points 1 year ago

I was going to say that there's no way he would kill himself because his ego wouldn't allow it. But before posting, I wondered if that was true so I looked it up. According to the Annals of General Psychiatry, it may actually be pretty likely.

Suicide risk is not rare in patients with narcissism, particularly in the context of severe narcissistic injury, where the patient feels shamed and/or vilified.

...snip...

Patients with narcissistic personality disorder are often thought to be less likely to make the kind of random non-lethal suicide attempts typical of the impulsivity associated with attempts made by patients with borderline personality disorder. However, Ronningstam et al. [8] point out that NPD patients are at high risk for completed suicides or highly lethal attempts without warning signs or self-disclosures. Indeed, they are made with the intention to end their lives. [Emphasis mine]

I could see Trump feeling shamed and vilified. Even more so as the various trials progress. If or when he thinks a guilty verdict is coming at him this could become a real risk. I hope they take this risk into account during the trials. I want this man in prison for as long as possible before he shuffles off the mortal coil.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


A spokesman for former President Donald J. Trump posted a video on Monday showing him at a gun shop in South Carolina, declaring that he had just bought a Glock pistol.

The post on X, formerly known as Twitter, included video of Mr. Trump, the front-runner for the Republican Party’s nomination for president who is facing four criminal indictments.

“President Trump buys a @GLOCKInc in South Carolina!” his spokesman, Steven Cheung, wrote in his post.

Mr. Trump is under indictment on dozens of felony counts in two different cases related to his efforts to reverse the results of the 2020 election and to his possession of reams of classified documents after he left office.

A salesperson at the Summerville location, who declined to give her name or answer additional questions, said Mr. Trump had not bought a gun.

At the Federal Bureau of Investigation, for instance, officials have increasingly voiced concerns about threats of violence, as Mr. Trump and his allies have targeted the agency.


The original article contains 488 words, the summary contains 165 words. Saved 66%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] Chainweasel 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we'll get lucky and he'll use it to shoot Tucker in the middle of 5th Ave.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Reverendender 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 year ago (14 children)

I think it's comical to be concerned about Trump with a gun. This is just a circus.

[–] Brunbrun6766 51 points 1 year ago

It's not being concerned about him with a gun, it's the blatant law breaking out in the open making a mockery of our laws and enforcement

[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

He's going to test his fifth avenue hypothesis.

[–] betterdeadthanreddit 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Fine with me as long as he does it completely alone.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Honestly? I might actually vote for him if he kills himself before the election

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think people should be allowed to get away with breaking federal laws on national television.

[–] cabron_offsets 5 points 1 year ago

lolbruh, welcome to post-2016.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 year ago

He's doing it simply because he was told he couldn't and he knows his base eats up the whole "rebel against the government" schtick. Which is ironic because they're also, ostensibly, the party of "law and order", i.e. cop-sucking.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 year ago

Dude couldn't maintain eyeball discipline during a solar eclipse.

[–] RaoulDook 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As if he doesn't already own several? I'm pretty sure I read something about him carrying a .45 regularly, but that was a few years ago.

But sure, if he wants to stack another felony on the pile, go right ahead. Whatever gets him into prison more quickly.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

He only carries shit. If he carried a gun you'd see it stuffed into his diapers.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›