WHYAREWEALLCAPS

joined 1 year ago
[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, this is a decades old ongoing issue with companies. They see pretty much anything IT related as a money sink that needs to be trimmed to the bare bones while giving salespeople absurd bonuses. Then they get all surprised pikachu faced when they get hacked or hit with ransomware and their last backup was 6 months ago when they let the IT department go without warning and hired some guys from overseas to handle it remotely.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 9 points 1 year ago

All month? This is the 342nd day of Halloween. All days lead to Halloween.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

There has definitely been a trend in the media of downplaying CP and CSAM recently. I thought others were crazy when they said it, but after paying attention a bit, yeah, it's happening. My theory is that it is because of algorithms filtering stuff like that out.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The average Republican voters doesn't care what the facts are.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Honestly, if he hadn't smack talked them the day after they got that 45 day budget passed, they probably would back him. Hell, if we didn't need to get the big budget passed in 45 days, they'd probably do it just to fuck with the Republicans. Or they could fuck with McCarthy by voting for him and making the GOP think he's cut a secret deal with the Dems.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 31 points 1 year ago

It's an abuser controlling his victim. They will go to whatever lengths they think they need to. Nothing is too dark except maybe murder, and even that's iffy.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 8 points 1 year ago

He's likely hoping one of his nutjob followers kills the judge. It also lines up to imprison the judge if he gets back into the White House.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 1 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Yeah, no, that is a direct violation of his 1st amendment rights. He knows he's playing catch me if you can with the court and his mouth because the court can only gag very narrowly defined speech. For instance the court could say he can't talk about pickles, so he talks about cucumbers soaked in a brine. The court tells him he cannot talk about cucumbers soaked in a brine. So he talks about a green vegetable roughly the size of a pickling cucumber that you then put into a mixture that contains seasonings, vinegar, etc. Will he eventually run out of ways to describe a pickle? Sure, but he'll have wasted shitloads of the judge's time and distracted from what was actually happening in court. And it's working. Do you know anything about what has been presented so far in the case? You probably don't because those articles don't bring the clicks and views like stories about his latest shenanigans on social media.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Waiting for the inevitable man to come in and go "But how are we supposed to unify if we keep dividing ourselves?" or "You'd have a fit if men complained about women attending a male only event."

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I, for one, welcome our new zombie overlords.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it’s never, ever, ever going to happen

That's been said about a lot of things that have happened in the last 7 years.

[–] WHYAREWEALLCAPS 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

And it is so ironic in the context that they used to screech about liberal justices doing that and that they needed to be reigned in.

 

He and the six heaviest girls will be sticking around to keep us in meat chickens. I've really enjoyed raising these guys.

view more: next ›