this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2023
278 points (95.7% liked)

politics

19497 readers
4847 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] foggy 131 points 2 years ago

"we're going to need a list of all of the people you know..."

[–] mriguy 91 points 2 years ago

She really needs to meet new people.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 2 years ago (2 children)

She's his attorney... Literally paid to say such things.

[–] dhork 55 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I hope she got her money up front, he doesn't exactly have a good track record of paying his lawyers on time.

[–] StarManta 28 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I don’t believe that’s true for a second. Only someone unethical would do that, and I have it on good authority that he is very ethical!

[–] IphtashuFitz 15 points 2 years ago

The best ethics! Perfect ethics. Nobody is more ethicier!

[–] FuglyDuck 7 points 2 years ago (2 children)

they're not actually paid to lie, you know.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] baldingpudenda 41 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Everytime someone describes trump with "best, most, ever" in a positive statement I always assume it's trump telling them specifically to say that. He has the best words after all.

[–] aJazzyFeel 3 points 2 years ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 2 years ago (3 children)

I know, that she is getting paid and all. But damn... Thats just degrading. No amount of money would bring me to tell such a embarrassing lie. Alone the word "most" puts every other of her social interactions into scale. She basically said: "Me, my mom, my husband?, my kids?, my best friend, they are all ethically worse than Trump." This person seems to have no values.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 years ago

she is getting paid

Oh, was this lawyer actually smart enough to get payment up front? Because we know Trump normally doesn't pay his lawyers after the fact. If she got paid, she has no values.

[–] IonAddis 3 points 2 years ago

Yeah, my first thought there is...what sort of crowd do you usually run with then?

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I mean, she is a lawyer. That's what they do.

[–] dulce_3t_decorum_3st 16 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago)

Most lawyers, yes, are heartless capitalist fee-gouging sociopaths. But some of us do a lot to help the helpless, to our own detriment. We give everything for the underdog fighting these snakes.

So, while I don’t take the generalisation personally—because it’s largely true—please never forget the minority of broke empathetic legal practitioners toiling away behind the scenes seeking actual justice for clients.

[–] ghostBones 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Following that logic, it means she doesn't know any ethical people.

[–] VoterFrog 8 points 2 years ago

Well she is surrounded by lawyers buh dum tiss

[–] kescusay 29 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, odds on when she leaves the team and starts telling people what a shit-show he really is?

[–] billiam0202 24 points 2 years ago (1 children)

So, odds on when she leaves the team and starts telling people what a shit-show he really is?

The second she has a book published and starts doing a promo tour for it, and not one minute before.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I'm so sick of that shit. These people should be charged with being complicit for hiding crimes.

[–] Riccosuave 7 points 2 years ago

Funnily enough, she may end up getting charged for lying on her affidavit that there were no more classified documents at Mar a Lago. She used some legalese AKA weasel words that may protect her, but it remains to be seen. She was, however, already sanctioned for over $1 million dollars, and I wouldn't be surprised if she was disbarred by the time all is said and done.

[–] OhStopYellingAtMe 24 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I’ve met sewer rats with a better sense of ethics.

Where did trump even find this lawyer? The 8th circle of hell?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 years ago

Bottom of the barrel. All of his other lawyers have dumped him.

[–] jeffw 8 points 2 years ago

Considering so many people refused to work for him, it’s possible. P

[–] jordanlund 23 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Says less about Trump and more about everyone else she knows...

[–] moistclump 3 points 2 years ago

Unless… she’s lying…

[–] [email protected] 18 points 2 years ago

Trump is really running out of qualified attorneys. This lady only got into law a decade ago and up until now has represented reaility stars in petty civil cases. This is who Trump has representing him over any of his current indictments? That's wild!

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 years ago (2 children)

He turned them over, he cooperated as he always does.

Yup, that's totally a lie ...

[–] TwoGems 7 points 2 years ago

I thought lying in court was illegal?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] MicroWave 14 points 2 years ago (1 children)

Alina Habba, an attorney for Donald Trump, praised the former president for being “the most ethical American” she knows after he was hit with fresh superseding charges that accused he and his handlers of deleting footage sought by the federal government in a classified documents case.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago (1 children)

I know you're just quoting but that should really be "accused him" rather than "accused he"

[–] MicroWave 5 points 2 years ago

Nice catch. Perhaps this is how we know this article wasn’t written by an AI lol.

[–] 2piradians 12 points 2 years ago

45 has a real penchant for surrounding himself with people who say things he wishes were true rather than the actual truth. I doubt he knows (or cares) there's a difference.

Hopefully that's a good thing in the sense that his legal team is so incompetent and out of touch with reality, they will get steamrolled (just as all his election fraud nonsense did).

[–] TwoGems 12 points 2 years ago (1 children)

How many rubles did she get to say that

[–] cashsky 5 points 2 years ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Adeptfuckup 10 points 2 years ago

Why only the most unethical lawyer would say something so ridiculous.

[–] CADmonkey 10 points 2 years ago

I wonder if he will be ethical enough to pay her?

[–] synceDD 9 points 2 years ago

"Attorney wont insult their client on cam" thank you for the hard hitting journalism

[–] Cruxifux 6 points 2 years ago

Ah, I love a good burn on Americans.

[–] DonaldTrumperino 6 points 2 years ago

Only the best, most honest people work for the most ethical, stable, genius.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 years ago

"He's at least as ethical as I am!"

[–] Captain_Patchy 5 points 2 years ago

She's either the best liar on the planet or the most ignorant person on the planet. Neither bodes well for the spray orange turd.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 years ago

She really should be disbarred for that statement, since it shows that she is too separated from reality to effectively practice law

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 years ago

key part of the phrase is "out of people she knows". man I realize it pays a lot but having to constantly isolate yourself less you get to know literally aaaaannnnnnnyyyyyyoooooonnnnnneeee!

load more comments
view more: next ›