this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
447 points (98.1% liked)

News

23641 readers
3422 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A hacker accessed a file containing damaging testimony about former Congressman Matt Gaetz, President-elect Donald Trump’s attorney general pick.

The file includes sworn statements from a woman alleging she had sex with Gaetz in 2017 when she was 17, corroborating testimony from a witness, and other evidence from a civil suit involving Gaetz ally Christopher Dorworth.

The hacked materials, which remain unpublished, also include unredacted personal information of witnesses and evidence tied to federal and congressional investigations.

The hacker’s motive remains unknown.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 218 points 1 month ago (4 children)
[–] njm1314 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The fact that he's saying it instead of publishing is how you know he's not for real

[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Counter-offer: hacking wants that sweet sweet BTC payout.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Or baguettes

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Maybe we don't doxx the witnesses, okay?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

So, just let him get away with it then? Because, Canadian, that’s what will happen.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] ZoopZeZoop 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Any idiot with Adobe Acrobat can do that. It shouldn't delay anything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The delay is that it’s not real.

Edit: the hack part

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] errer 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Witness prolly has the very real fear of “they release it, he gets confirmed anyway, Gaetz throws the book at him.” Easy for keyboard warriors to chide this person with no consequences to themselves.

[–] baldingpudenda 5 points 1 month ago

I can't remember exactly how it was said but, "The internet is all gas no breaks. Random strangers will hype you up and gleefully watch you ruin your life."

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

So black out the name and release it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] nutsack 8 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I don't think that would have the effect within the legal system that you think it might have

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Can’t know if it isn’t released

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 2 points 1 month ago

Still good to have it out there.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 month ago

Publish or shut the fuck up

[–] A_Filthy_Weeaboo 52 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Oh please...let this be true...Let Gaetz squirm like the spineless pedo he is

[–] gi1242 66 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

he's not in the slightest bit worried. his boss got away with worse, and as long as he toes the line he will be fine

[–] justhach 29 points 1 month ago

Exaclty. Blackmail only works if the target has a sense of shame, and clearly MAGAts abandones theirs long ago.

[–] A_Filthy_Weeaboo 3 points 1 month ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It won’t change anything. The pedophiles are in power.

[–] RagingRobot 14 points 1 month ago

Yeah I don't even think they are going to do confirmations like they usually do. Trump already said he wants recess appointments and he always gets everything he wants from these idiots

[–] [email protected] 32 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The hacker won't release shit. Nothing will happen. Everything will continue on like normal. We've been hearing about damning evidence about multiple people for years now. Here we are with none of it.

[–] justhach 20 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Still waiting on that Redditor to reveal the gay senator he was having an affair with.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Ohhh, that fiction. I forgot about that.

[–] Erasmus 24 points 1 month ago

Release the pedofiles!!

[–] WrenFeathers 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If they had it, they’d release it. There’s no extortion to be had here, no reason to delay. The only reason to have gotten it would be to release it. That they haven’t- pretty much means they haven’t got anything.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well it has all the info to completely dox anyone who testified against the ~~attorney~~ child rapist general. Magas would literally kill them where they sleep.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 month ago

Exactly.

If the attacker stole the file with the intent to publish information against Gaetz in order to harm him, they'd need to redact anything that could allow for attacks against those testifying before releasing it.

[–] letsgo2themall 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

release it, or shut the hell up. Not that it will change anything.

[–] RampantParanoia2365 3 points 1 month ago

Well maybe with the girl's info redacted if it's not.

[–] AbouBenAdhem 17 points 1 month ago

A file with damaging information about Gaetz?

Isn’t that like... any news article covering him?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Who cares anymore? You guys voted a criminal into power. Facts don't matter anymore.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 11 points 1 month ago

This isn't a hack, that is just the cover for a leak.

[–] Rapidcreek 11 points 1 month ago

An amazing number of “secure links” sure turn out to not be that. Damn humans.

[–] Sam_Bass 10 points 1 month ago

Publish it now

[–] MattTheProgrammer 7 points 1 month ago

It will change nothing

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

If released, I hope that the victim/witness information is redacted, unless of course this is a hack done by the Right to get the women's names out to the cult so they can do what the cult does best. =(

[–] aesthelete 5 points 1 month ago

What is this, 2024's version of Trump's tax returns? Nobody cares.

[–] nutsack 5 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

conservatives do not care about this. this is not what they care about. they don't care. it does not matter. liberals will never figure this out.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago

Or Trump has someone from russia hack gaetz files so they can't be used in court.

[–] x00z 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Gaetz would have been around 35 at the time.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

With all the shitty news out there, I'm begging the hackers to throw us a bone and release the files. I mean c'mon ... we're dying here.

[–] Clinicallydepressedpoochie 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

I'll never get why people cling desperately to these people suspected of kid diddling. There are millions of people right? What the fuck is so special about that one that we need to excuse them for preying on children?

This isn't a question for people in power. I understand their plea is game recognizes game. This is for all the voters that prop these people up.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are millions of people right? What the fuck is so special about that one that we need to excuse them for preying on children?

What's special is they're a republican, and there is dirt on them, which means they can be controlled. In a vacuum, nothing is special about Matt Gaetz. He's a goblin looking fratbro who by all accounts has a pretty annoying personality. His special power is having a father who is also a politician and a penchant for banging underage girls which his donors and peers can use to control his actions.

[–] Shapillon 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

There are two options imho:

  • They're so far up in their own media bubble that they don't believe it's true.
  • They don't care about it. Or at least not enough compared to the advantages of having said person in positions of power.
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 month ago

Let it have reach and traction in a way it can't be ignored, can't be doubted.

[–] finitebanjo 3 points 1 month ago

Smart, they can't smoke out the whistleblower if there is no whistleblower.

[–] RattlerSix 2 points 1 month ago

Sounds like a member of Congress getting ready to leak the report and blame it on hackers

load more comments
view more: next ›