finitebanjo

joined 2 weeks ago
[–] finitebanjo 1 points 14 minutes ago

The single group of American Citizens are facing no repercussions from the US Government. They're being thrown under the bus by the Chinese.

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 15 minutes ago

Actually, you might want to recount visible fingers. The size of the couch, that weird ass decor in the back, the angle of the windows, the way her hair wraps under her chin...

And it's just got that sort of blur to it that doesn't fit with real photographs.

[–] finitebanjo 0 points 18 minutes ago (2 children)

ByteDance employees chose to work for a Chinese PsyOp parent company who refuses to sell ByteDance. If anything, those employees are suffering because the CCP were given too many rights and protections for owning a business in the USA.

[–] finitebanjo 0 points 5 hours ago (3 children)

This is definitely AI generated.

[–] finitebanjo 2 points 5 hours ago (1 children)

It would be akin to passing a law that states Finite Banjo's friend Jose must no longer act as a proxy between Finite Banjo and Jose's friend Juan, as Finite Banjo is not constitutionally protected but Jose is, or Jose must cut all contact with Juan because Finite Banjo is harming Juan.

The fact that you think you can remove all context in an attempt to win an argument is just evidence of your inability to comprehend complexity.

[–] finitebanjo 2 points 5 hours ago (4 children)

And the subsidiary has explicit permission to continue operating if the parent company divests.

[–] finitebanjo 5 points 7 hours ago

Or they just route the sale of traffic through a domestic data broker and buy “analysis” on the Chinese side of the legal fence. There are so many badly policed and underregulated aspects of the data business that this shit never amounts to more than publicity stunts.

That is literally what Facebook was fined for, BEFORE the new laws were put in place. Cambridge Analytica did what you just described.

[–] finitebanjo 7 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (1 children)

Well, actually:

When Online Content Disappears

"38% of webpages that existed in 2013 are no longer accessible a decade later"

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago) (6 children)

#3. Number 3. The third part. THREE. Learn to read. All three are required conditions.

The parent company don't have judicial protections. They're based in China and are state owned and operated. The US-Based subsidiary isn't being punished, they're explicitly allowed to operate if the parent company divests, but are choosing to shut down instead.

[–] finitebanjo 5 points 10 hours ago

The /s is mandatory tho

[–] finitebanjo 1 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

For using deviced capable of recording audio and transmitting photos of the environment at all times. Every patient that comes through has all of their vulnerabilities exposed.

I hope hospitals that promote such behavior get sued into the ground.

[–] finitebanjo 16 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

"Rest assured knowing that I have pledged not to destroy my own privately owned forrests and that every year I write off a massive sum for not doing so."

 
 

For example, privacy violating linksys or netgear, or devices with components running improper firmware with a 14 year old vulnerability?

The reason that I ask, although I don't want this to impact the quality of answers, is that I'm shopping for a new router that is secure and private but rather than paying commercial and industrial prices I would rather get a consumer router and overwrite it's software.

 
view more: next ›