ZoopZeZoop

Agreed. Clogging up our news cycle with B.S.

No, but the act of killing it is.

Any idiot with Adobe Acrobat can do that. It shouldn't delay anything.

I caught that it was the wrong spelling of the word initially. I just think it'd be funny to redraw it around the misspelling.

My boss calls me a guru on some of the work that I do. I get that it is supposed to be someone who knows or is able to do everything about a certain topic, but it always felt a bit insulting because I feel like there's a charlatan edge to the definition of guru. She actually means it as a big compliment. She tells everyone.

I would like this comic redrawn, but shifting around this being phase instead of faze. I bet that would be fun, too.

Agreed.

And sometimes couches...

I appreciate your response.

I don't consider that plagiarism, it's just not original thought and goes against the spirit of assignments. Can I go back in time and get the approval of younger me to use my work, no, but that's a ridiculous bar to set. I define plagiarism as using someone else's work without giving proper credit for their contribution in your work/thought process.

Also, in terms of growth, students may grow over time, but if the assignment isn't the same under the same conditions, you may simply be sampling someone's work when they got more rest, had more time to devote to an assignment, or just knew more about the topic already. In other words, they may not have grown and the sampling was more favorable for them the second time.

When I evaluate students/colleagues, I look at mastery of the material. Do they show a working knowledge of the subject? Can they make important distinctions? Can they synthesize multiple parts to make an effective argument? In my field, those are the people who shine.

What are the arguments that it is plagiarism?

Sounds like he doesn't need to give them neuralink, then.

And lead in the pph.