this post was submitted on 11 Nov 2024
498 points (97.9% liked)

politics

19224 readers
3636 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GuyDudeman 329 points 1 month ago (13 children)

Good analysis:

"Ppl like her because she’s real. Ppl perceive Trump as real too. Dems need to do a better job of just being real with ppl. Coming on social media and chatting with ppl, etc."

That's why people liked Bernie too.

[–] [email protected] 282 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (5 children)

AOC is real.

But DJT is the most fictional character who's ever existed. Nothing he's ever said, done, or been has been true.

Sadly, we're stuck in the reality that allows his falsehoods to affect real humans.

[–] billiam0202 141 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Well, like the quoted person said:

Ppl perceive Trump as real too.

Now, I have no idea how anyone could possibly think that, unless they only get Trump sanewashed by their favorite news outlet.

[–] [email protected] 65 points 1 month ago (5 children)

You vastly, vastly overestimate the intelligence of the average person/voter.

Most Americans read and write at a 6th or 7th grade level.

[–] seaQueue 27 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Most Americans have never had critical thinking as part of their educational curricula. If you're very lucky you'll cover critical thinking skills as part of AP English in highschool, otherwise that's a second semester course your freshman year of college. Most Americans can't look at a particular piece of media and unpack what it's saying and why it's saying it. Americans are ridiculously easy to manipulate as a result.

load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] reddig33 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It’s the power of propaganda. The dems just need to start sending out mailers that scare voters like the republicans do. Shouldn’t be difficult. All they have to do is send everyone a copy of project 2025 a page at a time. They also need to hire a social media team that astroturfs and gets the talking points out.

[–] seaQueue 13 points 1 month ago

It doesn't work, they ran plenty of ads on P2025 and people responded that "Trump won't really do that, Dems are just trying to scare us."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] b34k 48 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Nah, DJT is real AF.

He said he’s gonna round up 20+ Million immigrants, I believe it. He says he’s gonna send the military after the enemy within, like Pelosi and Schiff, I believe it. He says don’t worry, no one’s ever going to need to vote again, to keep him in power, I definitely believe it.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

He's gonna try, I doubt he can convince the military to do anything to high ranking democratic officials.

Maybe if a "lower ranking" democratic congressperson like AOC do a BLM protest in Washington D.C, she might get harassed by the capitol police, but they'll be fine. I doubt she'll get shot.

The average civillian, however, if you still have any yard signs indicating that you support any democratic candidates, you might wanna take those down, because you might randonly get investigated for whatever trumped-up (pun intended) charges they invent. Or get a no-knock raid and ends with buller holes in your skull.

If you look "Mexican" to them, you could get deported if you don't have your papers with you, even if you are legal, or even a citizen. (Might wanna look into getting a fireproof safe to store those documents, also keep photo backups of any documents that prove that you are here legally)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork 15 points 1 month ago

It's easy for a serial liar to sound "real" when they are lying. That's what they're good at.

When you at least attempt to keep to the truth, it limits how appealing your sales pitch is.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 79 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Whoever was running Harris campaign needs to be barred from being in charge of any political campaign ever again; talk about legendary levels of mismanagement.

They had the golden opportunity to lean into the ‘weird’ meme and hammer Trump/Vance on that issue - but decided against it because it was what, ‘demeaning’?

The Dems need a firebrand, with a truely populist message and policies; rather than just lip service.

[–] AngryRobot 26 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The dumbfucks who stayed home chose not to have elections again.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Oh I thought it was the dumbfucks in the Democrat party who chose to run a shit campaign and marginalised their voters into not showing up while they focused on getting lobbying money and chasing right wingers fault 🤷

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Both things can be true at the same time; the world isn’t black and white - but various shades of grey.

The Harris campaign was awfully milquetoast, but people’s indifference also played a major role.

[–] Ensign_Crab 19 points 1 month ago

Don't run a campaign that inspires indifference then.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Implicitly. But if you look at the responses given in the article, I do not believe these people knew what they were choosing implicitly.

So many of them seem to be rejecting the government as it is, and stupid as it may be, Trump republicans are the only ones filling that void.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Thunderbird4 50 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I wonder what these numbskulls thought of Tim Walz. He seemed to do the real, down-to-earth thing pretty well also.

[–] GuyDudeman 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It was just too late. Plus, he was supporting Harris, who they didn't see as genuine.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] takeda 27 points 1 month ago (2 children)

We need real populists, that go after people's needs, not pseudopopulists like in GOP.

[–] seaQueue 16 points 1 month ago

Hard to pull that off when the entire core of the DNC is permanently latched onto the corporate teat.

We have a lot of work ahead of us if we want to break the core of the party and force even a smidgen of compromise out of them that costs their corporate donors profits.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] LovingHippieCat 154 points 1 month ago (5 children)

This is fucking nuts. Some of those answers are people being so uninformed and then acting like they're the ones that are informed. Some even voted for Trump because they think he's anti-war and will stop the Genocide in Gaza despite him wanting to turbocharge it. It's just. Fucking depressing. I don't know how to counter this. The far right has created a media ecosystem that allows them to feed trash into their viewers brains even if it's a blatant lie and those people will go from voting for a blatant racist and fascist who thinks people of color are not real Americans, to voting for a left leaning woman of color.

It's almost like they don't have any actual morals or beliefs and only care about being anti-establishment. Some say they'd vote for Bernie but instead voted for Trump despite them being completely opposite people. These people don't have media literacy. They've been brainwashed, and I don't know how to fix it.

[–] jrs100000 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

The thing AOC, Bernie and Trump do have in common is that they are all populists. That they would also have accepted AOC or Bernie means that they dont necessarily want a demagogue, but its also not a deal breaker for them.

We need to stop with the brainwashing talk. A few people on the fringe were clearly mentally ill, but the rest of them had agency and they made a choice.

[–] LovingHippieCat 25 points 1 month ago (3 children)

I get what you're saying. And agree somewhat. But I think you don't have to be mentally ill or an idiot or whatever to be brainwashed. But being brainwashed is 100% what a lot of people on the right are and refusing to use that term might make sense in some regard, but it also doesn't properly address how we could go about fixing things. While I don't fully know how to fix this, treating it like brainwashing is the only way we can address it, as long as we also approach these people with patience and compassion and try to show them why what they spout is brainwashed.

It's a cult ya know? And cults are brainwashed. And calling people mentally ill or idiots for falling for it will definitely just make them double down. But it's still brainwashing.

[–] jrs100000 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If half the population is actually susceptible to brainwashing over Facebook then democracy itself is unworkable. These people clearly have preferences and are making choices, including the choice to know very little about what they vote for. Im afraid that patience and compassion will only encourage this behavior.

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 22 points 1 month ago

If half the population is actually susceptible to brainwashing over Facebook then democracy itself is unworkable.

It's a bit like how the divine right of kings couldn't survive the invention of the printing press

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] takeda 17 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Trump is a pseudopopulists, he fools people into thinking he is fighting for them while fighting for himself.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

they think he’s anti-war and will stop the Genocide in Gaza

He's an IRL Peacemaker... He wants peace in Israel and doesn't care how many have to die to achieve it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 133 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If you voted for trump and AOC you need to make sure you never leave home without your fucking helmet on. Fuck.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Intergalactic 92 points 1 month ago (36 children)

I appreciate the value of honesty and authenticity as key reasons people choose to support a candidate.

However, it is clear that Donald Trump often makes false statements.

Furthermore, Kamala Harris might have benefited from participating in more contemporary media formats, such as podcasts and Twitch streams, to enhance her outreach. Additionally, focusing less on appealing to Republican voters might have been advantageous, as this strategy CLEARLY contributed to her electoral loss.

load more comments (36 replies)
[–] Fedizen 72 points 1 month ago (16 children)

trump only picked up 500,000 more votes than last time. Lets hear from the 10,000,000 that voted in 2020 but not this election

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Mighty 63 points 1 month ago

I thought this was just click bait. But some of the answers are actually interesting (and scary in that way) how people can "rationally" explain how they fell for the lies of trump ("he cares about Muslims", "he is a political outsider", "he gets things done"...)

[–] brucethemoose 50 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (4 children)

It's the delivery.

Delivery is everything.

Trump reached these people, and Biden/Harris did not. It's that simple. The message does not matter if it doesn't get there. And this is a tremendous failure, considering the war chest the Dems squandered.

And I have zero faith they will learn from it. All the arguing I see is over policy that these people clearly never even laid eyes on.

[–] reddig33 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

If by delivery you mean “lies and propaganda”.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] LANIK2000 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Jesus christ, this is what unaffordable education does to people. For fucks sake. I mean it's only fitting for a population that can't figure out that someone advertising a 1/3lb burger and directly comparing it to the competition 1/4lb, bragging about the price being the same, might indicate that 1/3lb is more despite 3 being a smaller number. What a combination, people that belive their thoughts are the only source of truth while having no clue what they're talking about.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] jpreston2005 36 points 1 month ago (7 children)

I think long COVID has impacted more Americans than we realize. Everyone out there suffering from diminished capacities thinking that the fascist sex-pest goomba is somehow more reliable than the nice black lady. I dunno about you guys, but I've just been seeing a whole lot of mistakes lately. On television, in News, in articles, just... everywhere.

And while a lot of it is probably people quiet quitting and not giving a fuck, I think a lot more people are suffering from the extended brain fog of long COVID than we think, and it's affecting everything around us. Unfortunately, that includes voting practices in elections.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

mine isn't a brain fog but COVID and a trump presidency made me not trust humans at all.

i no longer trust friends, family, neighbors, governments, leaders, police, doctors, businesses. none of them maintained trust during the Trump presidency and the pandemic.

but i still vote straight ticket democrat. because their platform doesn't include NAZI-ism

The NYTimes wrote it out for me:

The playbook for transforming a democracy into a soft autocracy was clear: Win power with a populist message against elites. Redraw parliamentary districts. Change voting laws. Harass civil society. Pack courts with judges willing to support power grabs. Enrich cronies through corruption. Buy up newspapers and television stations and turn them into right-wing propaganda. Use social media to energize supporters. Wrap it up in an Us versus Them message: Us, the “real” Russians or Hungarians or Americans, against a rotating cast of Them: the migrants, the Muslims, the liberals, the gays, George Soros and on and on.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (3 children)

For the people that don't want to scroll a bunch of stupid stories for the answers

comments from the video

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ArbiterXero 25 points 1 month ago (2 children)

These answers read like idiocracy…

“He felt like he cared because he was an outsider”

I’m just waiting for “She talked all faggy-like”

“Ow my balls”

“He really spoke to me, and her professional speak made me feel dumb”

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] 2ugly2live 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Their excuses are baffling. Harris didn't have policy. Okay, but Trump did? He kept walking about "concepts" of a plan, and lying about wanting P25. Trump is for the people? He is hanging out with, like, the national league of assholes and duchebags. "Harris was scary." BUT NAZIS AREN'T!?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't know if this kind of thing is captured very well but I wonder how many voted blue for other Federal offices but simply skipped President. I understand the general motivation behind "sending a message" and "leaving this one up to chance" but good Lord.

This is like me refusing to "play chase" with my kid even though he's running right towards the street. It's annoying as fuck every time but the consequence of me "refusing to play" could be dire. After I save the little shit for the 10th time I punish him, but in a way that doesn't kill or cripple him for life.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago (5 children)

Every single one of those answers is straight out of the mouths of Fox News. If you don't disable open nationwide propaganda broadcasts, you'll never fix the problem.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 month ago (5 children)

I know lots of people are really down on this but it seems like people just want change. We all know the system isn't working for most people right now and want something different.

Trump is different. Bad but different. If you have little hope make sense to break everything. If there's a real progressive change candidate people will be excited. Change is what is needed

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] cultsuperstar 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

I saw on more than one occasion that guys didn't vote for Kamala because she didn't go on Joe Rogan's podcast.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] genXgentleman 14 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

I had to stop reading the replies she received; the stupidity made my head hurt. My hatred for humanity is growing by leaps and bounds daily. I think I'll be a full blown misanthrope within 2 or 3 days. It has become crystal clear that we need to pull the weeds out of the gene pool. I'm for instituting a national license program to breed. You may obtain a license if you can pass a test which consist of a common sense section and the civics section of the U.S. naturalization test. 🤨😁

Edit: For the morons that can't tell. This was fucking sarcasm.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Well the good news is that the probability of such a program happening has gone up.

The bad news is that you are disqualified if you have all your teeth or any kind of college degree.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›