thatKamGuy

joined 11 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 day ago

Generously, people who were 14-16yo when Trump’s first term ended and weren’t fully aware of what was going on at the time.

Realistically, a large portion of ‘mainstream’ Republicans embarrassed by what the GOP has become - but still not certain if they can go against decades of Fox News programming and vote for a shudders Democrat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

we have the money

With the way things are going for the lower and middle classes, that’s a bold statement..

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago

Check out Infuse, it’s a pretty good front end for a home media collection.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 1 week ago

When ‘next gen’ (eg. PS5) becomes the new ‘current gen’, then the old ‘last gen’ becomes retro.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Probably safe to assume that the streaming app on your phone is collecting the same data about your viewing habits, whether or not you Chromecast it to another device.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (4 children)

Gore’s presidency would have been a continuation of Clinton’s, who were aware of the threat potential posed by al-Qaeda. So if/when the now infamous Bin Ladin Determined To Strike in US memo landed on his desk on August 6th, 2001 - or the even earlier “UBL [Usama Bin Laden] Threats Are Real" memos from months earlier; they would have been taken seriously and acted upon.

Instead Bush's response was to fob it off disinterestedly, saying: "All right. You've covered your ass"

So yes, learning from earlier failings - a theoretical Gore presidency would have taken these threats much more seriously, and could have prevented the thousands of deaths of 9/11, and tens of thousands of deaths in the subsequent wars.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 2 weeks ago (7 children)

Al Gore would have stopped 9/11, preventing two massive land wars in the middle-east, and the subsequent hollowing out of the US middle class.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 weeks ago (4 children)

Or literally never, ever connect your TV directly to the Internet (seriously, don’t do it).

My Apple TV does an infinitely better job than the half-assed built-in native apps; more services are supported and for longer, features are properly integrated, and the additional smart phone functionality (AirPlay, AirPods sync etc.) is a godsend in a busy household.

Plus the added bonus of not risking my network getting compromised, and one less company collecting and selling data about me to unscrupulous marketers and shady middle-men.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 weeks ago

I honestly think it will not live up to the levels of hype that the community will build itself up to.

Coupled with my suspicion that the single-player game will be as barebones as possible, with the goal of funnelling as many players into the next iteration of GTA:Online as quickly as possible, to sell more Shark Cards.

The good news is that in the end I’ll either be proven right, or pleasantly surprised.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 3 weeks ago

Cheap yes, but a person should also be asking “would it pass with the same ENCAP safety ratings as the above?”.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

Well, at least you can expect it to be a long supported, overpriced accessory! 🤣

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

If/when it happens, so be it - I’ll eat crow. But for the time being, Apple at least has long set/surpassed the standard for support lifetimes.

At some point, you just have to have a little bit of faith that not every company is going to immediately screw you over the first chance they get; otherwise you’ll never end up buying anything (new or otherwise), with the fear that the moment you do - they’ll drop support.

I mean, some companies do deserve that level of scepticism - but honestly, for all their other faults Apple is not one of them.

view more: next ›