this post was submitted on 20 Aug 2024
410 points (96.0% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4295 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Biden’s voice was strong and clear, and the crowd was far warmer to him as an outgoing president

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] dogsnest 208 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (6 children)

The debate was a one-off for Biden, and that's the way the cookies crumble.

Trump said the Dems were doing post-birth abortions.

Biden had a raspy voice.

Who was destroyed by the media?

[–] [email protected] 112 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

Howard Dean said “yeaaahh!” strangely that one time and that was it for him. It doesn’t take much.

[–] [email protected] 55 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Because our media is shit

Biden really was visibly too old. But they’re also pretty good at ginning up issues literally out of nothing when they want to.

[–] Blackbeard 16 points 3 months ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's confusing cause and effect. Howard Dean's speech was supposed to be a concession speech after losing the only early primary/caucus he was trying to win. He poured in all of his resources in the hopes of winning Iowa, underperformed expectations against a backdrop of dropping in the polls for weeks, and coming in third (with no real prospects for New Hampshire or South Carolina) basically made it impossible for him to have the volunteers, money, or press coverage to survive into the next stage of competing in bigger states with primaries clumped up together.

He showed everyone his plan of winning Iowa or going home, lost Iowa, and then gave some kind of rallying speech as if he had a plan to recover from that loss. He never did, and it wasn't the scream that killed his campaign. His campaign was dead before the scream happened. It's just that the scream was a particularly memorable way for a campaign to die.

[–] NewNewAccount 8 points 3 months ago

Big pet peeve of mine when people attribute his decline to the Dean Scream. The scream was the final nail in the coffin.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (2 children)

people didn't like that scream?

That's a pretty rad scream.

EEeeYEAH-HyeeuuUH!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RwkNnMrsx7Q?t=50

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 months ago (1 children)

There's a lot of fragile people out there who can't handle things like rad screams, dijon mustard, or women's right to self-determination.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Back when the internet was fun, there was a flash game where you could play as the different presidential nominees, and Howard Dean's special move was the "Dean Scream" where he would scream flipping back and forth from left to right, and all the enemies on screen would fall down. Top tier.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 95 points 3 months ago (2 children)

That's a pretty generous summation of the problems with Biden's debate performance. It was also hardly a one-off. Every time Biden appears it's a coin flip for which Biden shows up, which is why he appears so infrequently.

You are absolutely right about how Trump's bullshit gets largely ignored by the press though.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] ikidd 37 points 3 months ago

It was hardly a one-off. He was setting off alarm bells left and right beforehand, and the debate was his chance to regain some confidence. And he had a bad night then as well. So yah, he has his good days, but it's pretty apparent that his good days are getting far between.

This was the right decision, it's a shame he had to be pretty much forced into it by everyone else that saw it. I blame his handlers, and they should have their asses handed to them for trying to fuck the rest of us by keeping him past his best-before date and giving Trump the presidency.

[–] Ensign_Crab 34 points 3 months ago (6 children)

Biden had a raspy voice.

Biden said we finally beat Medicare.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It blows my mind that “Biden just had a raspy voice!!” isn’t banned as misinformation here. Because it literally is, there is no reasonable way to interpret “we beat Medicare” being yelled over and over as the result of a raspy voice. Absolute memory hole shit.

[–] Ensign_Crab 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

My favorite bullshit excuse was when they pretended it was jet lag when he hadn't been on a plane in two weeks.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I remember Jon Stewart: "How big was that jet?!?"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 26 points 3 months ago (1 children)

The debate was a one-off for Biden

Bullshit.

Biden had a raspy voice.

I really thought we were past the gaslighting that the only thing wrong with Biden was a sore throat. But here we are....

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

He was also getting hammered on Gaza. Over 650,000 Democrats voted "uncommitted" in the primary.

[–] [email protected] 121 points 3 months ago (6 children)

It's one event with a month of prep time and a teleprompter. Biden hasn't lost all faculties, but he can't be this "on" every day for the next 3 months while also being president. This is carefully curated to his strengths, making him look good, which is great, but it's no sign he could be president in 4 years.

[–] MajinBlayze 28 points 3 months ago (2 children)

And it's not like he delivered flawlessly, he still has at least one part where he seemed to get lost, and the crowd covered for him.

Did have real mixed feelings about the "Thank You Joe" chant. It was kind of wholesome in a way, but I imagine it feels bad to have been pushed out like he was.

[–] MrPoopbutt 17 points 3 months ago (3 children)

I hope he recognizes that he needed to do it. Even in 2020, "making" him run (I put making in quotes because you can't make a person run for office) felt like elder abuse. That is even more true now.

[–] chuckleslord 9 points 3 months ago (4 children)

They needed him to run to stop a Bernie nomination. So... he kind of was "made to", in that he also agreed that Bernie shouldn't get the nomination.

load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] prof_wafflez 14 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

I imagine it feels bad to have been pushed out like he was.

I'm sure it feels bad but he shouldn't have been running again in the first place. The dead horse has been beaten to powder but he is way too old to be running a country - especially 4 years from now.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 104 points 3 months ago (1 children)

“I’ve got a lot to do. I intend to get it done. It’s been the honour of my lifetime to serve as your president. I love the job, but I love my country more.”

Attaboy, Joe. Good man.

[–] someguy3 14 points 3 months ago (1 children)
[–] homesweethomeMrL 8 points 3 months ago

It’s a silent u

[–] [email protected] 83 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (3 children)

I think the biggest difference is that it is far easier to recite a static speach he has practiced 100 times than it is to dynamically adapt to a live debate.

[–] _stranger_ 26 points 3 months ago (7 children)

I think the difference is that he was recovering from a bad cold during the debate.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] stoly 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

They DO NOT practice these speeches, there's no time. Rather, they become like actors and are able to just go, pretty much like how news presenters do.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] dhork 65 points 3 months ago (19 children)

Well, yeah, it was a rehearsed speech, read off a teleprompter, with a sympathetic crowd. Much different than a debate, where you have to speak off the cuff, within a time limit, and the crowd (if there is one) pledges to be non-partisan.

And, maybe Biden took Trump's advice and hopped himself up on pills. I wouldn't blame him for it, personally.

load more comments (19 replies)
[–] [email protected] 40 points 3 months ago (8 children)

Biden's job was to save the party from a Bernie Sanders nomination. The DNC and the corporations couldn't have that.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] just_another_person 22 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I watched the whole speech. He still had the same issues. The pauses, stutters, stammering over sentences, and these were in the teleprompter. The difference is these were prepared remarks that were rehearsed, and he was speaking loudly for an audience. I wouldn't say he was "unrecognizable" from the debate, just a different situation. I woukd have voted for him, but I'm glad he stepped aside. It was time.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 12 points 3 months ago (1 children)

pauses, stutters, stammering over sentences

The dude has had a lifelong stutter. Has no one heard Joe Biden talk in the last several decades? He paused and stuttered when he was in the Senate too.

[–] just_another_person 8 points 3 months ago

He doesn't usually have those pauses when he's reading from teleprompter though, or at least it's less noticable. His off the cuff pauses and stutters seem more natural when they happen. When he's reading from a teleprompter and still having the same issues, it reads as if he's having issues comprehending the words that are coming out of his mouth as he saying and expressing them, which is understandably not illustrating confidence for some people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Roflmasterbigpimp 22 points 3 months ago

"I love the job, but I love my country more."

That's a strong sentence. I hope he can now just enjoy the rest of his life.

[–] NatakuNox 15 points 3 months ago

It's because he can focus on doing one job. Asking an 80.year old man to run the country on the campaign trail was laughable at best.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (4 children)

That's because it didn't take place at 8pm. Even people 20 years younger than Biden almost can't stay up later than 8pm.

[–] Bernie_Sandals 23 points 3 months ago (3 children)

Biden did not appear until 10.26pm Chicago time – which was 11.26pm in New York and Washington.

It was actually after 10pm when he spoke at the DNC.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago

I'm half his age and staying up past 9 is rare for me

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I honestly thought he still sounded pretty weak. He's never been a great public speaker.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] A_Random_Idiot 8 points 3 months ago

The debate wasnt fucking disasterous, god damn what is this fucking collective hallucination about the debate.

You know why he was better this time? Cause he hadnt spent the past 3 days traveling around the world and as a result wasnt jetlagged to fuck, and wasnt sick this time to boot.

And he still did 10,000 times better at the debate than Trump did.

load more comments
view more: next ›