chuckleslord

joined 2 years ago
[–] chuckleslord 3 points 14 minutes ago

No, you want the happy-go-lucky Miyazaki for FromSoftware news. This is the grimdark one, of Studio Ghibli fame.

[–] chuckleslord 2 points 24 minutes ago

Spoiler: it's a quid pro quo, like they've been telling anyone willing to listen.

[–] chuckleslord 1 points 27 minutes ago

Here's the possible impact sites. Ocean is a pretty good chance, and that would mean even less impact. If it's close to shore, then there's a chance for waves, but that's about it. Locations are based on the timing of when the asteroid will arrive in 2032, not the shape of the orbit which we have fairly good accuracy on (that's why the "beam" of possibilities is so narrow)

Currently, we're unable to directly observe the asteroid due to the distance, but we do have a good idea on what its orbit looks like, so any updates on the odds is coming from past, unintentional observations on the asteroid (we took a photo of something else in the sky, but know that the asteroid should be in that photo).

When the asteroid passes by again in 4 years is when we'll likely get the most info on location/impact before the potential impact in 2032.

All this info comes from this Scott Manley video. He's an excellent space science educator (and KSP player)

[–] chuckleslord 4 points 4 hours ago

If anything, it might get a tiny bit warmer

[–] chuckleslord 25 points 10 hours ago

Yeah... they definitely didn't consider this happening. Certainly wasn't the plan /s

[–] chuckleslord 14 points 11 hours ago (4 children)

A direct hit would be about the size of a fission nuclear bomb. Devastating for a city, but no regional or country-wide impacts, let alone globally

[–] chuckleslord 2 points 22 hours ago

I think that's the draw, yeah? It's like Twitter, without the madness

[–] chuckleslord 6 points 22 hours ago

Yeah, that's the shit rich people want you repeating. It makes it seem impossible to resist them.

[–] chuckleslord 30 points 22 hours ago (7 children)

Listen. It's not just dumb voters. It's a conservative propaganda vessel that funds any right-leaning talking points. It's madness being poured into any willing ear, all it takes is a little fear to let them in. I want to believe that individual volition trumps this by-the-numbers propaganda, but the proof is in the pudding. Make people scared and isolated and you can make them believe whatever shit you want (at least, on a macro scale)

[–] chuckleslord 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Even if we believe this story, it would need studies to verify that it actually works and is safe to do.

[–] chuckleslord 3 points 1 day ago

U/Phil_Swift_Official

[–] chuckleslord 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

"Doug Ford is glad there were no casualties." Dude, 17 people went to the hospital, what're you talking about? Did he mean fatalities?

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

35
Aurora rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 9 months ago by chuckleslord to c/196
 
 
view more: next ›