chuckleslord

joined 1 year ago
[–] chuckleslord 15 points 4 hours ago
[–] chuckleslord 18 points 4 days ago

Yep, it's their business model. People were pissed about Cyberpunk because they'd only played Witcher 3 after it was complete.

[–] chuckleslord 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

I like Inquisition. What's wrong with it?

I also love dragon age 2

[–] chuckleslord 9 points 5 days ago (1 children)

Gonna go out on a limb here and say this should probably be marked NSFW. Just maybe

[–] chuckleslord 1 points 5 days ago

Comic credit: Haus of Decline

[–] chuckleslord 13 points 6 days ago (4 children)

Dahl is played by Katee Sackhoff

[–] chuckleslord 14 points 1 week ago

How to resolve autistic burnout: unmask, remove societies expectations from your life, and reduce stress

Capitalism: fucking try it. I dare ya

[–] chuckleslord 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Wait! You're telling me that is east and west flip in the southern hemisphere? Shit, is that why the moon looked so weird in Peru? /s

[–] chuckleslord 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

"Left geographically". Damn, such a mouthful. If only there were a word for that... /s

[–] chuckleslord 6 points 1 week ago (5 children)
[–] chuckleslord 12 points 1 week ago (8 children)

It's a disparaging term towards accountants, turned to be one for capitalism writ al

[–] chuckleslord 18 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sarcasm without tags on 4chan gave safe harbor to neonazis. I think a slightly tarnished joke is worth it to keep out nazis.

That, plus sarcasm really only works if people know who you are, and thus can know you're being sarcastic. It doesn't reliably come across when you're talking to strangers.

 

Before downvoting, check the community.

If you fail to use the /s tag or specifically call out that your comment is sarcastic, I'm going to treat it as being earnest. I might ask if you're being sarcastic, but I will downvote as though you are being earnest.

The /s tag not only clarifies, but it also confirms that you're being sarcastic. A thing you cannot ordinarily convey via written text unless you specifically call it out. You can hint at it, readers can infer it, but you cannot convey it. To convey it, sans directly stating it, you would need to include a recording of you speaking the comment, which defeats the whole point of text chats.

"It definitely reads as sarcasm, you're just missing it" So what? I'm neurodivergent. I barely get this shit in its normal, spoken context. Why should I be expected to understand the implied sarcasm in your text comment?

"Telling someone you're being sarcastic ruins it" Unless your definition of sarcasm is just lying to someone's face, you do indicate sarcasm when speaking. Via the exaggerated, deadpan tone you use. Something you can't convey in written text unless you specifically call it out.

"I made it very clear via hyperbole that it was sarcasm" Have you talked to people? Your obvious, over-the-top, hyperbolic sarcasm could just be someone's opinion taken whole cloth. In fact, you probably modeled your exaggeration AFTER a person. Can you see why, if I don't know you, there's no way to tell?

"I forgot the tag" cool, if I see the edit adding it back in, I'll revert my downvote. Consider it the opportunity cost of forgetting.

"It doesn't hurt anyone" Yes, it does. You give credence to your exaggerated position that you would never take because the people who think like that exaggerated position will point to your comment as proof that they have support. It's why 4chan rebirthed nazism.

"I still won't do it". Then have fun with the downvote. You want to make the internet worse? I'll be sure that you don't get the internet points your brain craves.

33
Aurora rule (lemmy.world)
submitted 7 months ago by chuckleslord to c/196
 
 
view more: next ›