this post was submitted on 29 Jul 2024
448 points (97.3% liked)

politics

19222 readers
2639 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] just_another_person 166 points 4 months ago (3 children)

How in the fuck has the board of every company he's on not removed his ass by now?

[–] Blue_Morpho 118 points 4 months ago (3 children)

Because the board is his family and Rupert Murdoch's son.

[–] [email protected] 30 points 4 months ago (3 children)

... He has family left that hasn't thoroughly distanced themselves from him??

[–] TexasDrunk 16 points 4 months ago

Oh yeah. His brother is on the board and is also a shitheel.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Anyone who's still by his side knows who he is and likes it.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

Or is playing him, though at bestt said folks are practically indistinguishable until they start backstabbing.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 4 months ago

Have you seen his Hunger Games ass mother?

[–] WhatAmLemmy 20 points 4 months ago

That explains everything.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

We just need to put a posse together and go grab him and deport his ass back to South Africa.

[–] billiam0202 50 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Because if he's removed, the stock prices of any company he's involved with immediately snaps to a more realistic price.

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago

This. If you're a meme stock (Tesla), you have to keep it that way or else everyone is losing their shirts.

[–] Blue_Morpho 1 points 4 months ago

I believe he has become a liability. People more and more say they avoid Tesla because of Musk. It is possible Musk's removal would increase the stock price.

[–] DaddleDew 13 points 4 months ago

He placed people who are loyal to him on that board a long time ago. He can get away with anything now.

[–] meleecrits 84 points 4 months ago

Nothing short of hard financial and/or legal ramifications will stifle this kind of election interference. If it's not stopped now, it will take root and fester.

[–] [email protected] 67 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Here's the most important bit I think:

The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) advanced a proposal last week to force advertisers to disclose the use of AI in advertisements on television and radio. The use of mimic voices is already banned for use in robocalls.

“Bad actors are already using AI technology in robocalls to mislead consumers and misinform the public. That’s why we want to put in place rules that empower consumers to avoid this junk and make informed decisions,” FCC Chair Jessica Rosenworcel said earlier this month.

The FCC proposal would not apply to ads and video online and on streaming services, including the video shared by Musk.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I don’t think rules can help since the courts will just rule they can’t do that.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Doesn't the overturning of Chevron do exactly that, making it impossible for the FCC to create rules without explicit laws passed by Congress?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Not necessarily. It depends on the exact wording of laws already on the books. Chevron doesn't immediately gut all federal organizations of power. Just some of them, some of the time, and the details matter and will be determined in court one at a time.

[–] LEDZeppelin 34 points 4 months ago (3 children)

It will be fun to see how next generation of liberal leaning car buyers will view Tesla brand

[–] [email protected] 32 points 4 months ago (1 children)

We were honestly considering one, but my wife sited the lack of charging stations if we go on extended trips during vacation, and we both think he's an unmitigated asshole and refuse to buy anything associated with him.

Considering the number of reports that they are garbage, I think we dodged a bullet, lol.

We got a Honda CRV Hybrid and couldn't be happier. Next one is going to be totally electric but not a Tesla

[–] LEDZeppelin 7 points 4 months ago

Ditto. For my next car I went from why not a Tesla to anything but a Tesla.

[–] Chainweasel 23 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

I considered one for a while before he revealed himself to be a racist, fascist, man-child.
Now I'll never own one, I've been looking into the Hyundai EVs and honestly they seem much more reasonably priced anyway.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Their profits dropped by half last quarter.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago

The future is now!

[–] [email protected] 22 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Haha. Takes fire. Careful Elon, you’re not Iron, man.

[–] vegeta 53 points 4 months ago

Phony Stark

[–] Cadeillac 18 points 4 months ago

No, my house was on fire and now I'm homeless. I'm willing to bet absolutely nothing happens to him

[–] [email protected] 13 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is election interference not a crime in the US?

[–] AA5B 6 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Musk also has the right to free speech. He can say what he wants, as his personal opinion.

It’s using technology to impersonate someone that’s wrong, but I don’t know if our laws have kept up. I don’t think there’s a limit unless the person impersonated sues for slander or something. It is further muddied that public personalities have less protection and parody is legally protected

[–] boovard 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

And using a platform he bought to promote his ideas? Is having too much money free speech?

[–] CharlesDarwin 9 points 4 months ago

But the Freezed Peach and Marketplace Of Ideaz you guys!!!!

[–] [email protected] 7 points 4 months ago

This would be more interesting if he was taking more literal fire.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Of course there's no spam on Twitter. Elon promised us he'd fix that.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 4 months ago

Can't wait to use my free speech to build a guillotine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 4 months ago

The man has zero dignity.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Meanwhile Musk will face no actual consequences and X won't lose any users over this.

But rest assured he has definitely had his wrist (lightly) slapped.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 4 months ago

Super funny how Trump getting shot at has had no effect whatsoever on these headlines. 😆