this post was submitted on 22 Jul 2024

1500 points (96.5% liked)

Microblog Memes

5822 readers

1872 users here now

A place to share screenshots of Microblog posts, whether from Mastodon, tumblr, ~~Twitter~~ X, KBin, Threads or elsewhere.

Created as an evolution of White People Twitter and other tweet-capture subreddits.

Rules:

Please put at least one word relevant to the post in the post title.
Be nice.
No advertising, brand promotion or guerilla marketing.
Posters are encouraged to link to the toot or tweet etc in the description of posts.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

ReadyUser31

aeronmelon

1500

Diesel-smelling (lemmy.world)

submitted 4 months ago by ReadyUser31 to c/microblogmemes

150 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Jeremy Clarkson: Just been for a walk round the farm and I'm a bit alarmed by how few butterflies there are.

Something is afoot.

Danny Wallace: Diesel-smelling Top Gear host who threatened climate protestors misses butterflies.

top 50 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] polygon6121 363 points 4 months ago (16 children)

To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction. People can change their mind and that is a good thing. I would even go as far as calling it a very good sign that even a person as stubborn as the great ape Clarkson can change their opinion on this matter is absolutely fantastic. Good on Clarkson! And fuck the other guy for shoving up the past in his face when he is trying to be better.

[–] a9cx34udP4ZZ0 151 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

But have they? His insistence at this point is that he doesn't have to do anything, or change anything, science will "solve the issue". Nothing better than someone who thinks any mess they make can be cleaned up by someone else so why bother trying to make any changes that makes your life slightly less convenient?

He added: ‘I won’t drive a Tesla. I’ve got probably 10 cars, all with V8 engines. I don’t think electric cars solve anything. Science is going to be needed here, not politics. Science will solve it eventually. Always does.’

https://metro.co.uk/2024/04/29/problem-jeremy-clarksons-global-warming-joke-20736068/

To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

[–] SchmidtGenetics 124 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

Uhh isn’t progressing to electric cars… science progressing to help solve the issue? What a strange train of thoughts.

[–] MirthfulAlembic 68 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I know someone who has a similar outlook (climate change is real but science will solve it, so we don't need to change anything). Basically anything science produces toward that end they will move the goalpost and say it's not worth pursuing because science will fix it.

It is essentially their way of making climate change denialism seem reasonable and open-minded. I think if somebody came up with a miracle device to magically reverse everything, they'd complain it's too costly at any price.

[–] sudo42 36 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It is essentially their way of making climate change denialism seem reasonable and open-minded. I think if somebody came up with a miracle device to magically reverse everything, they’d complain it’s too costly at any price.

Yup. When/if we do find a way to dial back global warming, billionaires will be screaming for us to not use it because they've already found ways to make money off of people dying.

[–] peopleproblems 18 points 4 months ago

See: American healthcare system.

[–] masquenox 16 points 4 months ago

Uhh isn’t progressing to electric cars… science progressing to help solve the issue?

No. It isn't.

It's capitalism shifting their private transport scam from an energy source that they exploited the living crap out off to another that they haven't mismanaged into the ground yet.

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] [email protected] 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

He's right about electric cars not solving anything but wrong about politics not solving it. Science has already provided the solutions like over a decade ago but no one is willing to implement it.

[–] Grimy 31 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I'm really tired of this pervasive fantasy where people actually think we can get rid of all cars and bring public transport to the masses in the space of a year.

We live in a car centric society and changing that is going to take a decade at the minimum.

EVs are our best solutions currently, we don't have time to wait for trains or hydrogen. We should absolutely start trying to phase cars out completely but that doesn't negate the fact that saying "EVs don't help" is essentially being an oil barons mouthpiece.

[–] AA5B 16 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

changing that is going to take a decade at the minimum.

And that’s way too optimistic. Given the life expectancy of modern autos, the “quick” option of EVs will be a couple decades or more.

Building car-centric towns and cities has taken most of a century of constant growth. Now those cities exist and we no longer have the growth so rebuilding them is a much bigger job. We’re talking many decades, likely a century or more. In the meantime we can’t afford to be stuck with ICE.

Although maybe you’re not from the US so the problem is not as severe. Here in Massachusetts we also have the advantage of so many towns and cities being built out before cars. We’re “behind” on being car-centric so hopefully can fix that trend more quickly

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] sudo42 15 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (5 children)

Science is pushing electric cars for a reason. Clarkson's an idiot.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (2 children)

I don’t think electric cars solve anything. Science is going to be needed here, not politics. Science will solve it eventually. Always does.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] SchmidtGenetics 80 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (6 children)

If he’s changed wouldn’t he know what the issue was? It’s a little worrying that he hasn’t made the connection if that’s the case.

I don’t see this as a change of opinion, just a severe lack of understanding as a whole.

[–] polygon6121 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You are probably right. Or maybe he just wants to create a discussion

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] essell 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Is it possible a tweet doesn't contain the entirety of his thoughts on the subject?

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (4 replies)

[–] [email protected] 69 points 4 months ago (1 children)

To be fair. His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

Standard issue conservative. They only complain when it begins to affect them. If he didn't have a farm, would he still have moved in that direction?

Nope.

A common characteristic of conservatives is a lack of empathy.

Am I happy he did? Yes.

Am I holding my breath that he'll actually vote for change? Nope.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] mojofrododojo 39 points 4 months ago (1 children)

meh. he profited personally off of lambasting the very scientists who were trying to warn us. he literally made his fortune off of glorifying petrol guzzling shitwagons.

fuck clarkson. he's a fucking toolbag who's just now - as the world is on fire- is slowly starting to wake to the crisis he personally helped fuel.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (3 children)

Someone missed the episode(s?) where he raced the public transit system and lost. Or raced other drivers in noticeably slower cars in highly congested traffic and lost, or raced a bicycle and lost.

A semi-common through-line of the show was that cars are, and should be, for fun. (Full disclosure this was often pushed most heavily by James May, but I feel like Jeremy could have said no at any point.) They often lambasted average and everyday use cars.

I loved my old sports car! It was 2 seats and too much power! I had to get rid of it because it was unreliable and unsafe for traveling with my first kid. Neither would have been an issue with good public transit infrastructure in place.

Cars are not the problem, but car dependency absolutely is.

(I don't totally feel this way and do think cars a major contributing factor in some problems, like pollution of microplastic particulates from aggressive driving, but that isn't as quippy.)

load more comments (3 replies)

[–] Duamerthrax 31 points 4 months ago

His farming ventures have moved his opinion on climate in a positive direction.

It was effecting his vacationing. Hyper fucking privileged.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Oh yes, great. When it is too late suddenly the fucks who are responsible for this mess have a change of heart and deserve sympathies? Give me a break...

load more comments (1 replies)

load more comments (10 replies)

[–] VonCesaw 112 points 4 months ago (3 children)

To those curious, do not check out the original post

Comments are entirely "cloud seeding", "blocking solar radiation with dangerous chemicals", and sensible people arguing for encouraging biodiversity being shut out, a few by Car Man himself

[–] khannie 28 points 4 months ago

a few by Car Man himself

I was put off until this part. Curiosity is now at high levels. Expecting massive hoop jumping and that's always funny to watch.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Telling adults what to do will drive them to do the exact opposite. You tell me what to read, I'll buy Clarkson an aircraft carrier! Don't test me!

load more comments (2 replies)

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 70 points 4 months ago (6 children)

I quite enjoyed Top Gear. However. I have since found Clarkson to be just another rich old right winger that doesn’t care what he says. He’s a bit of an asshole.

[–] ladicius 37 points 4 months ago (1 children)

That "a bit of" is too nice. Much too nice. Really.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 4 months ago

I mean, that's his appeal in Top Gear, isn't it? Chief arsehole of the three nincompoops.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] anywho 66 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

I suppose he only cares about the climate because it now affects his farming business, that's it.

[–] ninth_plane 22 points 4 months ago

Having watched Clarkson's Farm I think he honestly went into the farming business to test and resolve his opinions on the climate. He still loves cars but uses the car persona to look at farming practices.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 57 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The only reason Clarkson is still well liked is because he is funny and charismatic. But over all he is still an arch-conservative Tory jerk.

[–] Smokeless7048 19 points 4 months ago (2 children)

for sure. I love him as a TV persona, but definitly feel he and I would NOT get along in person.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] Semi_Hemi_Demigod 52 points 4 months ago

Considering his opinion on diesels that's actually a pretty scathing insult.

[–] ScruffyDucky 47 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Yes, a foot constantly on a gas pedal

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] someguy3 44 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

This one might have more to do with pesticides.

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Diplomjodler3 32 points 4 months ago (2 children)

The solution is obviously more oil drilling.

load more comments (2 replies)

[–] MataVatnik 24 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Fuck Jeremy Clarkson

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] Sam_Bass 24 points 4 months ago

Leopards out there?

[–] Subverb 23 points 4 months ago

I saw a butterfly in my yard a few days ago and I just stared at it and realized that I don't think I've seen one in years.

[–] FlyingSquid 20 points 4 months ago (5 children)

I used to see so many monarch butterflies when I was a kid in Indiana. So many fireflies too. I don't think I've seen a single monarch since I moved back about a decade ago and hardly any fireflies.

load more comments (5 replies)

[–] [email protected] 19 points 4 months ago (3 children)

I never understood the appeal of this show or its hosts.

[–] [email protected] 34 points 4 months ago (7 children)

Do you like cars?

load more comments (7 replies)

[–] [email protected] 25 points 4 months ago

ignoring the subject matter and the real life behavior of the hosts - it was cozy, entertaining, TV that was well structured and generally amenable and fun

[–] TheBat 16 points 4 months ago

Some people like to see others who are enthusiastic about something and are having fun.

Like I have never seen Lancia in real life and I still get engrossed watching Clarkson talk about their history: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=N1RKpdFjE4I

Also, speaking of hosts, James May >>> other two bellends.

[–] Agent641 16 points 4 months ago

Butterflies ate my face

load more comments