this post was submitted on 12 Jul 2024
226 points (94.5% liked)

Criminal Justice and Crime

94 readers
1 users here now

This is a Lemmy.World community for discussions of Criminal Justice and crime.

Rules:

  1. This is a community about criminal justice. Posts should relate to criminal justice, crime, policing, courts and litigation, and other related topics. Posts about crime should be about a noteworthy crime, not "run of the mill" crimes.

  2. Be civil. You do not need to support criminal justice reform to participate in this community and civil discussions are encouraged.

  3. Posts should be news, discussions, or images related to criminal justice. Memes and humor are allowed but should not be excessively posted.

  4. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Utilizing such language in your username will also result in a ban.

  5. Follow site-wide rules.

founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 65 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Should have gone 90 over and driven right into a fucking wall.

[–] NegativeLookBehind 42 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Mrs Boebert please stop trying to blow the judge!

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 months ago
[–] [email protected] 30 points 6 months ago (5 children)

19 over? There are headlines about going 19 over?

[–] JeeBaiChow 149 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. Republican senators usually do under 18.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 6 months ago (2 children)

I think there’s something about 20+ over you lose your license, so I bet the cop was cutting her a little slack by reducing it to be under that limit

[–] Skanky 8 points 6 months ago

+25 over is considered reckless driving in most states and can get you an insta-trip to jail.

There's a VERY non-zero chance that Boe was caught going much much faster and the cop reduced it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 6 months ago

Weird how I get flashbacks from that Harvey Keitel movie where he plays a crooked detective that gets a blowjob during a traffic stop.

[–] SpaceNoodle 21 points 6 months ago (3 children)

There was an impeachment over a blowjob.

[–] zigmus64 19 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Well, to be fair, he was impeached for lying under oath and obstruction of justice…

[–] NegativeInf 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wasn't the original investigation about real estate?

[–] zigmus64 4 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Controversy over real estate was involved somewhere in the Clinton administration (the Whitewater scandal iirc), but I believe the articles of impeachment were issued over perjury committed while making statements under oath about his relationship with Lewinsky during some sexual harassment lawsuit/investigation.

[–] evidences 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

So the articles of impeachment were drawn up after Clinton lied during a deposition during pretrial discovery for a sexual harassment case brought upon Clinton by Paula Jones.

The reason why Lewinsky was even brought up was because she was mentioned in the Starr report which was a report prepared for the house judiciary committee by independent counsel Ken Starr.

Ken Starr was appointed by Janet Reno, I think, originally to investigate the Clinton's dealings with the Whitewater Land Company.

So if you connect all the red string the investigation was a real estate one that led to him lying about a blowjob.

[–] PriorityMotif 2 points 6 months ago

It was a political witch hunt. Iirc there wasn't anything wrong with the whitewater deal but they went ahead and paid the few thousand in taxes anyway

[–] NegativeInf 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Right, right. Why did reading that fill me with despair? Like, I just want some measure of justice served against the orange fascist.

[–] zigmus64 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I’m not sure… he was acquitted by the Senate in his impeachment trial, which is what happened to Trump (both times), and then the whole thing just faded into obscurity…

[–] NegativeInf 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

I just mean any justice? Like he just filed to have the hush money case dismissed due to the supreme court ruling.

[–] zigmus64 1 points 6 months ago

We’ll see. Hopefully there’s no standing b/c it’s a State criminal case.

[–] PriorityMotif 8 points 6 months ago

A guys presidential campaign ended because he said "yeeeawww" funny

[–] over_clox 3 points 6 months ago

Look, Bill didn't inhale, and Monica didn't swallow...

[–] ChihuahuaOfDoom 5 points 6 months ago

For a politician, sure.

[–] frickineh 4 points 6 months ago

In the mountains? Yeah. That's dangerous anywhere, but there are plenty of places on I-70 where that can get you killed real quick. Lots of curves and steep drop-offs. Not to mention that not paying the ticket is just another example of her being a dumbass who thinks the rules don't apply to her.

[–] grue 19 points 6 months ago

I'm calling it now: she's gonna claim she's immune due to the Speech and Debate Clause (even if the speeding had nothing whatsoever to do with traveling to/from Congress) and some dipshit MAGA judge is gonna buy it.

[–] Alexstarfire 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

In Atlanta I think you'd get pulled over for going too slow.

[–] tjsauce 1 points 6 months ago

Same with Metro Detroit; if you aren't 15 above, you will be passed

[–] [email protected] 8 points 6 months ago

Republicans LOVE this Behavior (she WON her Primary!)!

[–] Etterra 6 points 6 months ago (2 children)

Why does it always look like the skin on her chin is being stretched too tightly over her jaw bone?

[–] [email protected] 4 points 6 months ago

Surely the woman’s appearance is the least offensive thing about her?

btw did see some extra available for a limited time

[–] [email protected] 2 points 6 months ago

Boebert getting a court date wondering whether to give the judge a tugjob during the proceedings or recess.