hypnicjerk

joined 1 year ago
[–] hypnicjerk 83 points 1 week ago (1 children)

walter never gets high on his own supply, dies

[–] hypnicjerk 34 points 1 week ago

thanks for comprehending the reading so i don't have to

[–] hypnicjerk 26 points 1 week ago (2 children)

4.5 million seems like not a very high budget unless it's only meant to be seed money and release into early access like last epoch.

[–] hypnicjerk 9 points 1 week ago

the subtitle is even funnier than the title

[–] hypnicjerk 66 points 1 week ago (2 children)

bro paid $750 for a piece of paper and seems shocked that it's not magic

[–] hypnicjerk 16 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

alternate headline: After Nearly 4 Years, Countless Scathing Reports: No Consequences for Coup Leaders

[–] hypnicjerk 4 points 2 weeks ago

i don't think it's lying, necessarily. i suspect that it's embellishing, and it's inarguably providing an incomplete, intentionally flattering picture.

[–] hypnicjerk 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

the precipitous fall of print media over the past couple decades is something that would one day be written about in the history books if they weren't also full of shit.

[–] hypnicjerk 15 points 2 weeks ago (8 children)

Could Wreak Havoc

yeah... so what are we giving it before one of these things escapes containment, 5 years? less?

[–] hypnicjerk 101 points 2 weeks ago (20 children)

you really think someone would do that? just go on a once-respected publication and tell lies?

[–] hypnicjerk 23 points 2 weeks ago

nobody wants to believe that they're a villain, even mid-moustache twirl

[–] hypnicjerk 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Moreover, users of the satellite receivers were involuntarily taking part in attacks and might have experienced reduced device performance during these occurrences.

the article isn't 100% clear, but this line suggested to me that they were being used to perform attacks themselves (although it also states "Allegedly, the functionality was needed to counter the attacks of a competing entity.")

view more: next ›