It doesn’t read like AI to me,
i agree at first glance, but being confidently incorrect (especially getting the source material correct but drawing a dead wrong conclusion) is sort of a hallmark of the model.
a couple years ago i was pretty good at spotting AI work but it does get harder as time goes on.
i'm not familiar with windowscentral.com.
what's the over-under on the article being AI slop too?
oh hey i've been to that movie theater
Specialists mentioned
virgin
not if i have something to say about it
this is an extremely oniony headline
you're right, that looks like i had a stroke
headline should read "Wooden Spoon Only Thing In Man's Life Not Giving Him Cancer". "That not giving" is grammatically incorrect.
"wooden spoon only thing... that not giving him cancer"
it should be that is not / that's not / not. 'that not' is nonsense with a singular subject.
headline is weird
oh my fucking god i could have sworn this was satire for this line alone. bro is so twisted that he's dogshit at diablo that now he's going for the world first level 60 druid IRL
e: it is satire, i ate the onion.
(also please use the shithead's name in your post titles so our filters can pick it up, thanks!)