this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2024
312 points (98.4% liked)

politics

19073 readers
6313 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Fewer than half of House Republicans bothered to attend Speaker Mike Johnson's retreat

It's wild what a few short months of actually getting to know a person can do to your opinion of them. That's what House Republicans seem to have learned since October, when they replaced the glad-handing Rep. Kevin McCarthy, R-Calif., with smarmy fundamentalist Rep. Mike Johnson, R-La., for the Speaker of the House role. Johnson's election was treated like a big win at the time. Republicans were unified in cheering and chanting "Mike! Mike!" like they were celebrating a championship-winning quarterback, instead of a guy who serves creepy youth pastor vibes.

Johnson's popularity lasted as long as an embarrassing dance craze, however. It hasn't been five months and already Johnson's colleagues are pulling the Mariah Carey "I don't know her" bit. Tuesday, CNN reported that fewer than 100 House Republicans bothered to RSVP for their congressional retreat in West Virginia this week, meaning that less than half the caucus showed up.

top 37 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] reddig33 71 points 7 months ago (2 children)

If the party splits, maybe we’ll finally get a push for ranked choice voting.

[–] SteveCC 25 points 7 months ago (2 children)

Yes! If you like RCV or want to learn more about it check out https://represent.us/

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Lol if a GOP schism is what finally kills FPTP in the US… well, it’d be an unexpected win from an unexpected source, but I’d take it.

[–] SteveCC 6 points 7 months ago

Right, IMO First Past The Post being good enough has led to more partisanship, extremism and polarization. It has increased the power of money and decreased the power of We the People.

[–] ChonkyOwlbear 1 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

I tried way too long to remember which candidate's initials were RCV. I need to go to sleep...

[–] SteveCC 1 points 7 months ago

Ranked Choice Voting

[–] [email protected] 10 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (2 children)

Yes please so actual liberals have a chance at winning.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

Shhhh let’s keep that part quiet if/when the Rs split and think it’ll help them. Otherwise they’ll gladly fail, just to screw the libs.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 7 months ago

That’s not what liberal means…

[–] homesweethomeMrL 69 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Note that Ken Buck is a Tea Partier. He’s tapping out because MAGA is too shit-for-brains even for him.

The author of the “Blue Lives Matter bill” said these motherfuckers are the worst.

[–] simplejack 35 points 7 months ago

I wonder if the State of the Union was the tipping point for him. You had MTG, looking and behaving like Randy Marsh at a kid’s baseball game. That’s where the party is now.

[–] [email protected] 50 points 7 months ago (2 children)

The one saving grace is that you can always, always trust fascists to begin in-fighting at a moment's notice.

[–] partial_accumen 33 points 7 months ago (2 children)

When a group joins together based on "purity" against all others, they eventually look at each other and find each other's purity lacking.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 7 months ago

Purity about who to hate, which of course leads to more and more hate that is eventually directed to others in the group!

[–] peopleproblems 9 points 7 months ago

See that's you step in and fan the flames. Make up shit.

I'm so white I burn when it's cloudy. Look at Mr. Sun Tan showing off his impure equitorian flesh trying to say his idea is the best when he clearly lacks the brains to try.

Listen to Mr. Squeak. His balls never dropped quite right, and his kids are "y'know what I mean".

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago (1 children)
[–] Witchfire 3 points 7 months ago

Couldn't happen to a nicer party /s

[–] Zombiepirate 41 points 7 months ago (1 children)

These same people were griping to Politico last month that Johnson's presentation at the last weekend retreat ignored pertinent-to-members issues like how to win re-election and grow their majority. Instead, "Johnson effectively delivered a sermon" about "declining church membership and the nation’s shrinking religious identity." They're just mad that they have to suffer the lives they're seeking to forcibly inflict on the rest of us.

After fifty years of pushing for theocracy these dim bulbs have finally actually thought about the ramifications.

[–] whereisk 16 points 7 months ago (1 children)

They don't give a shit about theocracy or anything else, they only care about power and money, there is no core idea they won't abandon and their rhetoric is as bendy as a wet noodle - they simply didn't sign up to lose, and this guy doesn't look like he's helping them win.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 7 months ago

Mike Johnson is suuuuuch a creepy weirdo that even the magats are getting the willies from him.

[–] [email protected] 32 points 7 months ago (1 children)

When your whole "thing" is hate-based, this is inevitable.

[–] whygohomie 12 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Purity-based movements that use hate as a weapon inevitably end in circular firing squads.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Never fast enough though.

[–] MegaUltraChicken 19 points 7 months ago (1 children)

Good. We hate them too. How about every single member of the GOP fucks off?

[–] FuglyDuck 6 points 7 months ago (1 children)

except that one guy that...uh... did something. Uh.

never mind. maybe he's just an imaginary sock puppet.

oh well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

Even the Republicans that have been primaried for not going along with the MAGA cult are terrible people who just hit their limit of being terrible.

[–] AllonzeeLV 16 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago) (1 children)

The Republican brand is hatred, and has been as long as I've been alive.

Not exactly stable bedrock for fostering cooperation.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 7 months ago

Cruelty is the point and it is nearly inevitable they are going to turn some of that on each other.

[–] AshMan85 12 points 7 months ago

Good, gooood. Let the hate flow within you!

[–] Eldritch 10 points 7 months ago

It was never a good thing that everyone else had a monopoly on this. Sadly I think this self loathing still won't cause the need introspection.

[–] Potatos_are_not_friends 9 points 7 months ago

Oh no. Looks like they're gonna Jan6 and nazi parade/send death threats to each other now?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 7 months ago* (last edited 7 months ago)

In a pit such as the GOP, it’s hard to know where one snake ends and another begins. But I’m all for it devouring itself all the same.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 7 months ago

It's ok, I hate them as well and I'm not even American

[–] foggy 4 points 7 months ago

Fracture baby, fracture.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 7 months ago
[–] [email protected] 1 points 7 months ago

I was reading this professionally published article seriously until it referred to the "vibes" that are being "served" by one of the most powerful politicians in the country.

[–] CharlesDarwin 1 points 7 months ago

This is one of the least surprising outcomes. How many mean girls get along?