this post was submitted on 10 Jan 2024
289 points (95.6% liked)

politics

19224 readers
3052 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Donald Trump, the chief propagator of false “birther” claims first against then-President Barack Obama and later against Sen. Ted Cruz, has a new target: Nikki Haley.

As Haley surges in New Hampshire polling, Trump posted an article on his Truth Social account from a right-wing outlet that claimed Haley, his GOP rival, is ineligible to be president because her parents were not U.S. citizens when she was born.

Haley was born in South Carolina and has lived in the U.S. her entire life. Her parents were immigrants, who became citizens after her birth in 1972.

“The birther claims against Nikki Haley are totally baseless as a legal and constitutional matter,” Harvard Law School professor emeritus Laurence Tribe wrote in an email. “I can’t imagine what Trump hopes to gain by those claims unless it’s to play the race card against the former governor and UN ambassador as a woman of color — and to draw on the wellsprings of anti-immigrant prejudice by reminding everyone that Haley’s parents weren’t citizens when she was born in the USA.”

all 39 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 85 points 11 months ago (4 children)

the guys playbook is not very thick. and hes an lying idiot.

par for this course.

i dont understand how every media outlet that exists isnt broadcasting the words 'trump lying again' instead of this obfuscation they like to achieve that hides his misdeeds from the ignorant.

[–] utopianfiat 10 points 11 months ago

Honestly this is great though. The GOP should be bombarded with this fact for the entire primary, make sure Haley supporters never want to hold their nose in the general.

[–] Candelestine 6 points 11 months ago

As much as it irritates the contrarian in me, I do have to chalk this up to an honest criticism of capitalism in general. Since news corps have to pander to both advertisers and broad swaths of the public, who are often on the squeamish side when it comes to facts they themselves find unpleasant, big news corps are extremely limited in how they can present things.

Generally viewer-funded news gets around this, in the US that's things like PBS, NPR, Democracy Now and nowadays, Patreon supported content creators. Not that this system is without flaws or anything, but it's significantly better in general.

But look at it this way: They're selling a product, in an environment swarming with competition, and their costs are very high. So they're going to lean into the biggest markets they can. The kind that eat too much McDonalds and watch reality tv and don't vote. Naturally, those folks don't like their analysis to be too hard-hitting, otherwise it'd be routinely, roundaboutly implying they're fat, stupid and lazy. Saying that to your customers is rather counterproductive, no matter how true it is.

I'd be reluctant to speak so openly about it myself, except there's not really many of them on here. They're mostly all on facebook, twitter and reddit still. Y'know, the lazy options.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

His playbook is scrawled in crayon on the back of an Applebee's kids menu. It just reads "whenever I do something bad, make up a story about the other side doing it"

[–] homesweethomeMrL 69 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think we’d be remiss if we didn’t blame Haley for fucking around with trump in the first place.

Remember the demented orange rule: Everyone who works with trump gets shit on. No Exceptions

[–] captainlezbian 6 points 11 months ago

Yeah, on one hand I feel bad blaming the brown lady for her facing racism, but on the other hand we all hate the racist guy as much as we can and like no fucking shit this was going to happen. It’s not that he genuinely believed that Obama was from Kenya, it’s that a black guy pissed him off and so he fucking lied. Now a desi lady is pissing him off so he’s gonna tell basically the same lie because his supporters fell for it last time. You can’t win with him, only against him

[–] [email protected] 46 points 11 months ago

The irony of this guy wanting to disqualify someone from running for president based on the constitution.

[–] Pohl 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Somebody is getting nervous about those poll numbers in NH, huh.

His anxiety and flailing would bring me happiness if we weren’t on the brink of a disaster.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago

If you smelled like puss, you would be too.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 11 months ago

Nikki Haley will still gargle his bathwater on national TV.

[–] Zombiepirate 28 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I'm sure it's just a coincidence that the only people he targets with this shit aren't white, because I've been repeatedly told by Republicans that he's definitely not a racist.

The dumbest part is that idiots think he's clever.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I’ve been repeatedly told by Republicans that he’s definitely not a racist.

Time for that Sartre quote:

“Never believe that [they] are completely unaware of the absurdity of their replies. They know that their remarks are frivolous, open to challenge. But they are amusing themselves, for it is their adversary who is obliged to use words responsibly, since he believes in words. The [racists] have the right to play. They even like to play with discourse for, by giving ridiculous reasons, they discredit the seriousness of their interlocutors. They delight in acting in bad faith, since they seek not to persuade by sound argument but to intimidate and disconcert. If you press them too closely, they will abruptly fall silent, loftily indicating by some phrase that the time for argument is past.”

[–] [email protected] 24 points 11 months ago

I suppose this means her audition for the GOP VP nomination isn’t going too well lmao

[–] CaptainSpaceman 22 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump prolly was born in Cambodia or something, its always projection with these goons

[–] AFKBRBChocolate 17 points 11 months ago

“I can’t imagine what Trump hopes to gain by those claims unless it’s to play the race card against the former governor and UN ambassador as a woman of color — and to draw on the wellsprings of anti-immigrant prejudice by reminding everyone that Haley’s parents weren’t citizens when she was born in the USA.”

Must not have a good imagination. What he hopes to gain is to undermine his next closest rival by making people think she's ineligible.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Third verse, same as the first!

The question is, does his audience go to see him for new material, or do they just want him to play the hits?

[–] Everythingispenguins 1 points 11 months ago

Both maybe. Think of it as a remix

[–] [email protected] 14 points 11 months ago

“I can’t imagine what Trump hopes to gain by those claims

you cant. really?

[–] [email protected] 13 points 11 months ago

Busting out the classics again. It doesn't matter what the truth is, Trump just aims to put the idea in the heads of folks that are open to xenophobic or racist beliefs.

[–] FlyingSquid 13 points 11 months ago

Yes, Donald. We know. Anyone who isn't white wasn't born in the U.S.

[–] cheese_greater 13 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

I was surprised to discover her ethnicity, just thought she was a 'nother white (yet tan) 'Pub

[–] inclementimmigrant 13 points 11 months ago

I'm sure he'll be asking for a long form birth certificate soon but I doubt this will work on Haley as she's white passing and she's done a good job mentally to suppress her heritage unless it's convenient for her.

[–] Bwaz 11 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Given this guy and his following horde's tendency to project, I think it's probable that Trump himself wasn't born in the U.S.A.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Trump wasn't "born" at all, per se. He unexpectedly oozed out of his mother's anus.

[–] Buffaloaf 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Thanks, I'm going to go throw up now

[–] [email protected] 1 points 11 months ago

Oh look, another one

[–] cabron_offsets 10 points 11 months ago

All these republicunts can fuck each other in the ass with a cactus. Fucking traitors, one and all.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This guy has zero shame. What an asshat.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


DES MOINES, Iowa — Donald Trump, the chief propagator of false “birther” claims first against then-President Barack Obama and later against Sen. Ted Cruz, has a new target: Nikki Haley.

“The birther claims against Nikki Haley are totally baseless as a legal and constitutional matter,” Harvard Law School professor emeritus Laurence Tribe wrote in an email.

“I can’t imagine what Trump hopes to gain by those claims unless it’s to play the race card against the former governor and UN ambassador as a woman of color — and to draw on the wellsprings of anti-immigrant prejudice by reminding everyone that Haley’s parents weren’t citizens when she was born in the USA.”

“Someone should tell him [Trump] that the North won” the Civil War, joked Burt Neuborne, a professor emeritus at New York University Law School and the founding legal director of the Brennan Center for Justice.

Former U.S. Attorney Joyce Vance, an MSNBC columnist, called Trump’s suggestion that Haley is ineligible “offensive” but also noted that it could be an issue that eventually makes its way to the courts more fully.

But nonetheless, the question of the term ‘natural born citizen’ has not been fully fleshed out in the courts, and it may be that Trump is relegating us to more meaningless discourse in this area just like he did with the birther lies about Obama.”


The original article contains 735 words, the summary contains 226 words. Saved 69%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 months ago (1 children)

As long as there are headlines with his name in big letters, he's got what he wants. And the MSM just. keeps. on. falling for it.

[–] stoly 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They aren't falling for anything, the rage clicking is making them rich.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Yeah. There's that.

But no one's getting rich off posting those stories on Lemmy, or upvoting them in such large numbers. He's like a train-wreck that we can't look away from.

Time to implement a keyword filter for PieFed, I guess.

[–] stoly 1 points 11 months ago

Well when you click the story, ad money appears in the bank account of the news site--that's my real point.