this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2025
258 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19612 readers
4934 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This is a gutting of the scientific research establishment which has created much of American prosperity since World War II, when the US used the promise of survival and stable funding to lure academics from Germany.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 day ago

Elect a clown, expect a circus.

[–] [email protected] 155 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Further confusing the situation, it is uncertain that President Trump has the authority to unilaterally halt government funds allocated by Congress. Under Constitutional separation of powers, Congress passes spending bills, and the president executes the law as it is written.

Get fucked NYT this waffling fucking language is what enables this. It is certain he doesn't have the authority, and not being able to say so is allowing Trump to dictate the terms of how our fucking government works.

[–] [email protected] 56 points 2 days ago (3 children)

who's gonna stop him?

this congress?

this scotus?

[–] [email protected] 59 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's completely missing the point. The point is the press has been talking like this since 2015. They have given him every avenue to just pretend this is how things work. It has only gotten to this point due to this kind of waffling bullshit not willing to call a spade a spade.

It's not about the fact that no one is going to stop him, we haven't even had a press that's been willing to point out that he doesn't have these powers for almost ten fucking years now.

[–] Arbiter 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Because guess who owns the press.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sudo42 1 points 1 day ago

Good news: People are starting to become aware of the class war that has been going on for the past 50 years.

Bad news: We lost that class war.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago (1 children)

You may be underestimating the amount of the US economy directly or indirectly impacted by a freeze like this. This is a big deal not just because it's usurping powers, but for simple economic reasons. Lots of rich people and Republican representatives that can't be too happy about this. They want MAGA nonsense to be distracting people so they can get big fat tax cuts, not actually be hurting their business interests.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

I mean, maybe when they stop getting paid and the lights at the government buildings get turned off?

[–] foggy 30 points 2 days ago (2 children)

The milquetoast whitewashing of Trump's transgressions are really all itll take for him to be successful in destroying this country. If our media apparatuses fail to mobilize us, we'll be an easy herd to thin.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The parallels to our Media and the media of Germany before Hitler took over is frighteningly similar.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] BrianTheeBiscuiteer 8 points 2 days ago

It's the Faithful Execution Clause (Article 2, Section 3, Clause 5) and he's absolutely violating it.

What's the remedy though? Likely a Russian-ectomy from the GOP to actually stand up to him. Even if SCOTUS rules against Trump they have no method of enforcement. I wonder if SCOTUS should have any kind of power to impeach or even expell a President (high bar, maybe unanimous decision).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] inclementimmigrant 24 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Well good luck to those 65% of veterans who voted for trump and were trying to buy a house.

The schadenfreude is delicious.

[–] nieminen 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I keep hearing that word in the three body problem novels I'm listening to. Thanks for spelling it out so I can look it up 🤣

[–] Bytemeister 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It's German. Means "Dark Humor".

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

It is German, but it does not mean "Dark Humor":

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Schadenfreude

Schadenfreude (/ˈʃɑːdənfrɔɪdə/; German: [ˈʃaːdn̩ˌfʁɔʏ̯də]; literal translation "harm-joy") is the experience of pleasure, joy, or self-satisfaction that comes from learning of or witnessing the troubles, failures, pain, suffering, or humiliation of another.

[–] [email protected] 52 points 2 days ago (9 children)

I wonder how bad it will get before a single Trump voter realizes what they've done.

[–] T00l_shed 10 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] sudo42 3 points 1 day ago

“Sorry, I can’t hear you over the sound of my freedom”.

🎶Freedom’s just another word for nothing left to lose…🎶

[–] roofTophopper 6 points 1 day ago (2 children)

They won't. They will literally blame everything else but him. He could storm into their house, kick their dog, shit on their head, and still post on Facebook how it wasn't him.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

"Yeah, but that event was taken out of context!" Or "Well, yeah, he did and said those things, but that's not what he meant!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] bizzle 21 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I've got a friend who's a trumper (he didn't vote tho and his county was blue) and I think he's almost there. But nobody wants to be wrong.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (2 children)

I've got a friend who's a trumper

I still don't understand this statement

[–] [email protected] 20 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It's really really easy to just think the entire voting group of his are nazi fascists who wanted all the terrible things he's going to do, but the sad reality is that so many of them are just fucking stupid and just didn't consume the right kinds of media (ie they only got the propaganda) and thus don't know what's going on.

[–] Sanctus 2 points 1 day ago

Can confirm, every dumbfuck I was friends with (EXCEPT, SOMEHOW, THE DUMBEST OF THEM ALL) turned into a trumpette. I dont talk to them much anymore, one was a real Nazi (ditched him), one is just fed the shit by his parents, and the third is a gamer but a loud self-proclaimed christian gay man. Its just the dumbest shit you ever seen. Icing on the cake is the dude that lowers your IQ simply by speaking like a cartoon fascimally of a dumb person voted Kamala and I never clapped so hard in my life when his two brain cells rubbed together to say "The stuff Trump had to say just sounded like Hitler." Absolutely incredible.

[–] bizzle 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

That's his problem. Dumb as a motherfucker and gets his news from Facebook and TikTok. He's still a good dude though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It’s really really easy to just think the entire voting group of his are nazi fascists who wanted all the terrible things he’s going to do

Describes all the trumpers in my sphere.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I'm not saying that those people don't exist. But there's also just stupid morons who got duped.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Fair, I was just feeling extra saucy about all this bullshit this morning. Sorry.

[–] Dashi 6 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I don't understand this statement. Are your only friends people you agree with 100% on all things? That must get boring, what do you even talk about?

I have friends that voted for Trump. Not many but a couple. Am I friends with all Republicans? No just like I'm not friends with all democrats.

In order to radicalize someone, one of the first steps is cutting them off from people that disagree with what you are trying to teach/preach/say. When you pre emptivly do their cutting of for these republican friends/ family you are just leaving them in an echo chamber of hate/racism. Believe it out not, like what some others have said, not all republican voters are bad people.

[–] RubberElectrons 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (8 children)

No, but there are certain important things that I do hold very important and would struggle to connect with someone on if they disagree.

I believe America is the country of second chances, the land where if you want to get educated it will be available to you on fair terms, and so forth.

Now we're training teachers on how to damage efforts by ICE to detain the children of migrants at school to coerce and deport. That's not my vision for America, it's not right and I don't respect anyone who thinks it is.

load more comments (8 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dance_ninja 5 points 2 days ago

It's all about vibes. They don't care too much about what actually happens.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 days ago

Relax, they've already been convinced that all scientists do nowadays is autism vaccines and gender

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] zlatiah 28 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It was just HHS a few days ago... Then it came for NSF... Then this happened

I know the official memo claims this is "temporary" but there is literally no way this would end well. Heck there was at least one clinical trial terminated because of the "temporary" HHS pause, and this burden is on the entire country now

I envisioned for the worst when Trump was elected... and somehow this administration has managed to exceed some of my wildest expectations

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago

Thankfully a federal judge blocked this from taking affect for all open awards until Monday. This gives time for other lawsuits to be filled to block it completely, as this is entirely unconstitutional.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought it would all be slower, so there is less risk of immediately crashing the economy... Apparently not.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 2 days ago

Gotta crash the economy so the rich can swoop in and collect the last of the holdputs whonstill own homes instead of rent.

[–] TomMasz 34 points 2 days ago (1 children)

He has absolute power unless someone steps up and says no. Regardless of its legality (hint: this is illegal), it will happen if Congress or SCOTUS does nothing to stop it.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I wish the fucking military would arrest him. It's about our only hope left, and a shitty one at that.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

And then military dictatorship will start... nice

[–] errer 19 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Lots of my academic friends are real worried, particularly those who are paid entirely with grants…

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

It's a fast timetable too. This isn't a "continue on and we'll figure things out", it could be "don't come to work tomorrow and good luck with rent".

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 9 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Just a temper tantrum.

Can't even deliver on the promise of a strongman with this whiny baby shit.

[–] knightmare1147 7 points 2 days ago

As much as I want to write him off like I have for years, now the despot has actionable power and is actively hurting people.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago

Just a temper tantrum that will hurt a lot of people.

load more comments
view more: next ›