this post was submitted on 27 Oct 2024
693 points (99.3% liked)

politics

19121 readers
4393 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Since people seem to have missed this one, unsealed in the Smith filing:

-Trump used a burner phone, routed through a foreign country to contact Michigan house speaker.

-He tried to pressure the speaker in this off book call.

-Speaker McCarthy knew about the burner phone line.

-The phone showed up as “Spam Risk Egypt” on caller ID.

all 48 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Boddhisatva 224 points 3 weeks ago (4 children)

That seems like a big deal. Proof that he knew this call was something he had to hide.

[–] UnpopularCrow 92 points 3 weeks ago (5 children)

Regardless of how crooked and obvious of a big deal this is, absolutely nothing will be done about it. The time for consequence in America for politicians has passed.

[–] foggy 44 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

It's maddeningly clear that there are powers in place green lighting a criminal enterprise.

If they succeed the future will ask "how the fuck did 320 million people stand by and let it happen?"

We didn't.

[–] Shanedino 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Aren't we kind of not doing anything though? Looking at somewhat recent events, the trump cult attempted an insurrection when things didn't go their way. I can't think of anything to that level on the opposite side.

[–] foggy 9 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

There's nothing we can do.

Those looking at it will say "he was a criminal why wasn't he behind bars?!"

Yeah, we all have been wondering the same thing. Protests, grassroots campaigns, and the SCOTUS is still green lighting fascism.

[–] idiomaddict 2 points 3 weeks ago

We could do things, but we don’t realize it. If Americans protested like the French (plus guns), the American government would be a lot more afraid of them.

[–] DogWater 3 points 3 weeks ago

Because the people getting fucked aren't the gun lovers.

Shout out liberal gun owners and socialistRA.

[–] CharlesDarwin 11 points 3 weeks ago

Well, Republican politicians.

[–] saddlebag 8 points 3 weeks ago

This is like sandy hook. When America let all those kids die without flinching, the moment had passed

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago

I hope it hasn't, but recent facts show it has. :(

[–] [email protected] 47 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

It better show how un-fucking-official of an act it was and prevent that bullshit president king immunity pass the scrotus gave him.

[–] Boddhisatva 20 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This shows that. If it were an official act, he would not feel the need to hide it.

[–] linearchaos 8 points 3 weeks ago

You know the shows that and I know this shows that but if you ask the scotus that he bought and paid for....

[–] [email protected] 9 points 3 weeks ago

Turns out SCOTUS was more corrupt than even he estimated, so he wasted some money and time on setting that call up.

[–] cabron_offsets 5 points 3 weeks ago

I think you missed the part where there is no justice for this traitor cunt.

[–] Hobbes_Dent 93 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Equally important - who set it up for him?

Not trying to be funny.

[–] meco03211 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Isn't Baron good with the cyber?

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 weeks ago

hey BB got SIM? 18/m/Florida

join #LagoPoolParty for deets

[–] ShittyBeatlesFCPres 73 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Oh, please. We all use burner phones routed through Egypt to call Michigan state legislators. It’s as American as Mexican food.

[–] dhork 58 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

I am still waiting for the taco truck on every corner I was promised if Biden won in 2020

[–] PunnyName 13 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] SatansMaggotyCumFart 9 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)
[–] PunnyName 10 points 3 weeks ago

Same, and I live here.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 weeks ago

Come to northern Indiana

[–] [email protected] 45 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

If he bounced it through a foreign telecom/IP network, the NSA has tapes. Lordy.

[–] NegativeLookBehind 20 points 3 weeks ago (2 children)

Even if he didn’t route it through a foreign country, I’m sure they have it. I’m sure they have tons of intel on him. Why they stand by and do nothing with it? We may never know.

[–] Zomg 7 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Because NSA is defense. what you want is judicial, which is the FBI.

[–] NegativeLookBehind 0 points 3 weeks ago

“They” being the government. Should’ve said that before.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I would be willing to wager they have the voice transcripts of every call made in the last ten years

[–] NegativeLookBehind 8 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I’m sure of it. Yet he remains a free man, openly conspiring against the country, committing crimes and plotting treason. But anyone who’s capable of doing something about is either in on it, or seemingly unconcerned.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago

We know the nsa basically has the whole internet downloaded from Snowden leaks. We know they have all the metadata. I assume they also have transcripts if not actual recordings of every call made anywhere starting from the time they had data centers capable of holding that much storage

[–] [email protected] 26 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

I'm waiting with bated breath for this to be picked up by a more neutral source so I can boost the shit out of this without being dismissible.

[–] WoahWoah 12 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

Or you could, you know, look directly at the primary source material helpfully excerpted and screen capped for you right in the Tweet...

Meh. Too much work, hopefully someone else has 15 seconds and enough energy to do it so you can "boost" it.

If this isn't an emblem for the state of society right now, I don't know what is.

[–] dhork 22 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Plot twist: his phone died and he and to borrow Bob Menendez's phone

[–] [email protected] 3 points 3 weeks ago

Exactly. A burner phone for him is someone else's, and they never get it back.

[–] demizerone 19 points 3 weeks ago

Impact this will have on his supporters: 0

[–] TokenBoomer 4 points 3 weeks ago

Word on the street is he got it from this guy—

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

How did he prove he was actually himself? Seems like anyone could have done it with a bit of AI.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

This was before AI of that quality was accessible.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Fair enough, but a decent actor could probably work as well.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Or a third grade actor like Trump?

There is, after all, all the witness testimony from his side of the call.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

I understand we have all the proof now, but back then, how can someone get intimidated by a call that could easily be fake.

[–] Sam_Bass 2 points 3 weeks ago

doubt trump did the connection himself but do believe he would use it