this post was submitted on 22 Oct 2024
362 points (98.7% liked)

politics

19144 readers
3332 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Cross-posted from "Too Bad, So Sad, Too Late - McDonald’s tells U.S. restaurants it’s not a ‘political brand’ after Trump visit" by @[email protected] in [email protected]


Excerpt:

Though President Donald Trump visited a Pennsylvania McDonald’s location on Sunday, the fast-food giant is trying to stay neutral in the presidential race.

“As we’ve seen, our brand has been a fixture of conversation in this election cycle. While we’ve not sought this, it’s a testament to how much McDonald’s resonates with so many Americans. McDonald’s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next President,” the company said in an internal message viewed by CNBC and confirmed by a source familiar with the matter.


I haven't eaten at a McDonalds since before covid, and I don't really miss it.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ensign_Crab 139 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If McDonald's isn't political, they should have that as part of the brand standards to which franchisees must adhere.

McDonalds' opposition to unions is political.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 83 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (6 children)

“Upon learning of the former president’s request, we approached it through the lens of one of our core values: we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

When you're door is open to fascist demagogues, it's not open to everyone.

[–] chetradley 24 points 1 month ago

If your company platforms racists, it's a racist company.

[–] Sterile_Technique 21 points 1 month ago

If a Nazi sits at a table with 9 others and no one objects, there are 10 Nazis sitting at that table.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

we open our doors to everyone

So I can have my local McDonald's close for several hours while I get some vanity pictures of me standing in front of a fryer?

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

“... we open our doors to everyone,” the company said.

But also you must leave within 30 mins or it's loitering and you will be trespassed.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Allowing everyone behind the counter serving food to unknowing customers sounds like a massive health code violation.

[–] inb4_FoundTheVegan 7 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Without a hair net or hand washing in Trumps case. Photo op is gonna get y'all sick and you'll deserve.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 1 month ago

They don't care. Nazis have money too, and McDonalds doesn't discriminate.

[–] [email protected] 74 points 1 month ago (4 children)

You claim to not be a political company, but you gave a platform to a facist rapist ~3 weeks before his election

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] givesomefucks 73 points 1 month ago (4 children)

It was probably a franchise owner that did it and corporate didn't know till the rest of us.

Obviously fuck Sicky D's, but I bet corporate is more pissed off than anyone else.

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 month ago (7 children)

They did know beforehand, an AP article said as much:

“Upon learning of the former president’s request, we approached it through the lens of one of our core values: we open our doors to everyone,” the company said. “McDonald’s does not endorse candidates for elected office and that remains true in this race for the next president. We are not red or blue – we are golden.”

[–] Myxomatosis 27 points 1 month ago

This gives me a great reason to never eat at McDonald’s again.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 1 month ago

Open doors to anyone, by closing them for anyone not pre approved to show up when Trump was there.

[–] jaggedrobotpubes 12 points 1 month ago

That's a hail-mary reframe for "piss-colored".

Nearly had it, too.

[–] undergroundoverground 6 points 1 month ago

"- we are golden, like the shower"

Fixed that for them.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ThePantser 10 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Nope the corporate had to have been fully aware since there was a joke on SNL about his visit happening the next day. It was in the news that it was gonna happen and McDonald's did nothing to stop it.

[–] givesomefucks 20 points 1 month ago (2 children)

since there was a joke on SNL about his visit happening the next day

It was in the news

I think you're confused.

Because I said they likely found out when everyone else did...

And you replied saying they found out...

When everyone else did?

McDonald’s did nothing to stop it.

Then there's the part where I'd still need to explain how franchising works

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] dhork 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

McDonalds is a franchise, local owners are separate entities from the franchise "parent".

Plus, McDonalds is a huge company. They probably couldn't move their massive legal machinery to respond in time to stop it. Even if they could they would probably have had to know which franchisee was doing it ahead of time, and also have to find something in the franchise agreement specifically they were violating.

[–] Leeks 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)

In b4 McD’s changes the franchising agreement to require all events with media present to be approved by McD’s corp prior to the event.

[–] thebeardedpotato 6 points 1 month ago

I would be surprised if they don’t already have this

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 month ago (3 children)

They can distance themselves all they want. The damage is done.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] dhork 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Too late! MAGADonalds is now as toxic as Chik-Fil-A (both politically and to your colon)

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I still hate the chicken place more. On top of the other overtly political shit, I really dislike how they get their shitty restaurants into airports and thruways and other places with captive audiences and then still close on Sunday just for their virtue signalling bullshit. If they were actual Christians they would pay their employees more and open on Sundays to give food to the hungry. Hell even Ronald gives some money to orphans.

[–] dhork 8 points 1 month ago

thruways

Exactly what they did in New York State. What use is a highway rest stop where the main food store is closed on Sunday?

But the company that New York gave the contract to is the problem. They made those rest stops too small. All it takes is one bus stopping and the line for the tiny restrooms will take a half an hour. I hope the company goes bankrupt and they tear them all down again and rebuild them to be the proper size.

[–] elliot_crane 9 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You know I’ve been thinking about this since the memes are really driving home this association between the Hamberdler and McD’s. I wonder if this will push people away from buying their food on the long term and inadvertently lead to some subset of the population eating healthier than they otherwise would have. Probably just wishful thinking on my part though.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Snapz 39 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You can't just say it. Where's the action?

Revoke that fucker's franchisee licenses to start. He'll paint the building red white and blue, rename it Magadonalds, and they'll all flock to it and get dysentery from the freedom meals until it closes down when it's revealed that he's been molesting kids at the Sunday school he "volunteered" at

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TehWorld 38 points 1 month ago (5 children)

It seems that most McDonald’s are removing EVERYTHING from their lobbies. No more free refills on drinks, no ketchup or salt, even napkins are behind the counter now. Makes for a considerably more annoying visit, especially as they’re woefully understaffed, so you have to wait for someone to be bothered to get a couple napkins and ketchup while your kid screams at you.

[–] [email protected] 29 points 1 month ago (3 children)

The point is to not have a lobby anymore.

The US has always been obsessed with the drive-thru (nothing says good eats quite like huffing car fumes) and covid pushed a shift toward people just buying fast food to take home and eat.

So discourage people from dining in until "The demand is low so we are being more green or some shit by getting rid of it".

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago

They've also been supporting the IDF for a while now. Fuck McDonalds.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago (6 children)

i believe this is simplification for automation. dont need humans if you dont need resources in the lobby.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Oh look, a sack of shit serving shit food.

Fuck McDonald's.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 month ago

A sack of shit serving sacks of shit

[–] barsquid 31 points 1 month ago

McDonald's trials a second clown in bizarre PR stunt, attempts to distance themselves immediately after.

McDonald's today attempts to disavow a PR stunt after backlash regarding a second clown character being added to the fandom. Reviewers described the addition as "depressingly old," "demented," and "a massive health code violation."

Other reviewers were appalled at the character's backstory. "This is supposed to be a family restaurant," said one online complaint, "they're adding a character who is rapist wearing orange clown makeup? I know we're close to Halloween but that is just completely unacceptable. I cannot bring my children here."

[–] Fluffy_Ruffs 31 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I haven't eaten at McDogball's in years. Their food has always been trash and now it's overpriced trash. If this steers more people away from eating there for political reasons then all the better.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 month ago

They should try telling their franchisees that...

[–] MooseTheDog 13 points 1 month ago

Finally a clown with more makeup than Ronald McDonald.

[–] 2piradians 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Ah yes, damage control. You chose this, Mickey D's, now would a sales slump 'resonate' with your shareholder clowns?

[–] JWBananas 14 points 1 month ago (4 children)

That's not how franchising works

[–] 2piradians 5 points 1 month ago

Does corporate not make money from franchises? Honest question because I thought it worked that way.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] BigPotato 10 points 1 month ago

Pretty much the same, can't really boycott something I've already been not consuming!

[–] aquinteros 7 points 1 month ago

yeah I'm going to start non politically going to Carl's jr from now on

[–] [email protected] 6 points 1 month ago

First they came for the Trans People. Then they came for the immigrants. Then they came for McDonald's. We warned you.

[–] Sam_Bass 5 points 1 month ago

everywhere the orange rolls becomes a political circus. no exceptions

load more comments
view more: next ›