this post was submitted on 19 Oct 2024
465 points (97.5% liked)

politics

19149 readers
4304 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

“He’s doing a good job,” Trump saidabout the Israeli leader. “Biden is trying to hold him back, just so you understand, Biden is more superior to the VP. He’s trying to hold him back, and he probably should be doing the opposite, actually. I’m glad that Netanyahu decided to do what he had to do, but it’s moving along pretty good.”

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 108 points 1 month ago (12 children)

If you are an American voter and you sit this one out or vote 3rd party and Trump gets in you are directly supporting escalation and taking whatever little restraint away that Netanyahu is feeling from the USA.

Instead of calls for restraint you will have cheerleading from the sidelines.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 month ago (43 children)

C'mon enlightened lefties! Come on and tell me how you won't be voting for genocide and we should follow so the Democrats figure out through losing the election that they should court lefties. Nevermind we get 4 years of, "he's doing a good job" as long as Democrats learn to denounce genocide.

C'mon you fucking cowards, get in here and sell me on how Trump winning helps solve your single issue voting on genocide.

[–] Ensign_Crab 51 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm voting for Harris. She shouldn't be supporting genocide and neither should you.

[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 month ago (24 children)

Absolutely no disagreement there. I don't condone genocide, and think we should do something about it but I'm not foolish enough to think not voting for the lesser of two evils accomplishes this. We are in agreement.

load more comments (24 replies)
load more comments (42 replies)
[–] [email protected] 98 points 1 month ago (2 children)

it’s quite different from Trump’s bombastic rhetoric: He has repeatedly said that Israel has to “finish the job.” The former president’s Friday comments appear to be an attempt to paint Biden, and by extension, Harris, as being less supportive of Israel than him

Trump wants genocide escalated and completed on a faster timetable. If you don’t think that includes the West Bank in the long-term plan, you’re being naive.

Biden is trying to get a ceasefire deal from a madman. Harris needs to win the election and can’t if Israel turns against her. Trump actively wants to commit accelerated genocide on Palestinians.

Anyone who is pro-Palestinian and is thinking about voting for Trump needs to be aware of the long-term consequences.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 1 month ago

Anyone who is pro-Palestinian and is thinking about voting for Trump needs to be aware of the long-term consequences.

*Anyone who is pro-Palestine and is thinking about not voting or voting for anyone other than Harris, just to be clear.

The foundational lesson of the trolley problem is not about the effects of the two options, it's that not pulling the lever is a choice too.

Third-party voters, I know the psychological reaction to being told you "have to" vote for Harris causes you to dig in further, to be more contrarian. I know the feeling. So to be clear, you don't have to do anything. But we can't escape the ethical and moral effects of a choice not to mitigate harm. The dominos are lined up, pushing the one that says "Stein" or "No choice" will cause the one that says "Trump" to fall, it's as simple as that. Our moral culpability doesn't end at the ballot box, it ends at the end of rational foreseeability.

The right takes an oversimplified view of reality to avoid confronting complicated truths. Don't be the same by thinking if we ignore a difficult moral choice, it goes away. Trump is telling you what he plans to do. Stopping him is a moral imperative if you want to save as much life as possible.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 1 month ago (17 children)

What now "genocide" folks?

Still think Trump is the better choice for Palestine and Gaza??

[–] Pilferjinx 43 points 1 month ago (2 children)
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 month ago

Oh I know. It was to call them out.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (16 replies)
[–] brucethemoose 54 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (26 children)

From a purely strategic perspective, is this wise of Trump?

My impression is that even many American Jewish people don't like Netanyahu. And he doesn't need to remind anti-Harris protest voters that he's even more anti Palestine. Many MAGA diehards don't even like Netanyahu.

Like... who is he appealing to? Older Republicans, I guess, who remember Israel's early days?

[–] someguy3 69 points 1 month ago (2 children)

He's appealing to people that hate Muslims.

[–] themeatbridge 50 points 1 month ago (2 children)

And people who think the rapture starts with a holy war in Jerusalem.

[–] davidgro 13 points 1 month ago
[–] Serinus 12 points 1 month ago

The "left behind" Christians, who want nothing more than Armageddon.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Sanctus 42 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ghostalmedia 22 points 1 month ago (1 children)

If he can keep steady poll numbers after an insurrection, my guess is that this won’t impact him at all.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Polling doesn't capture turnout changes. This is the kind of thing that's largest effect, if materialized, would be boosting dem turnout

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 month ago (6 children)

Oh, I don't think there's any political calculation to 99% of what Trump says anymore. This is more about how much he likes "strongmen". Hell, lots of folks in Israel don't even like Netanyahu anymore.

load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (22 replies)
[–] errer 38 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This dumb fuck is gaining in the polls.

I just…can’t anymore

[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Keep in mind that the polls right now are also being flooded with right wing aligned groups

https://flood-watch.vercel.app/

[–] [email protected] 10 points 1 month ago

Yeah, polls much like any mathematics based discipline are susceptible to garbage in garbage out. You can have the perfect model but if the raw data put into it is shit then all youll get out of it is shit.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] GreenKnight23 28 points 1 month ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] ceenote 32 points 1 month ago (7 children)

Honestly, is there anyone alive today with more blood on their hands than Benjamin Netanyahu?

[–] Stovetop 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's sad to say, but yes. Gaza is a horrific tragedy, but it is an admittedly small corner of the world.

The Palestinian health ministry has reported 40,000+ Palestinian dead. Meanwhile, George W. Bush is responsible for the deaths of over a million Iraqis following his completely unnecessary invasion of Iraq. He's still kicking, probably using some of that blood on his hands for the painting he does now.

Putin is also pulling comparable numbers as Bibi in Ukraine, though that conflict has been going on for a little bit longer than the one in Gaza. But that's also not counting how many of his own men he sent to their deaths, which is estimated to be over 100,000.

Henry Kissinger would also be on this list but thankfully it's been almost a year since his long-awaited demise.

And that's really only looking at conflict. Not factoring in others who are responsible for large-scale humanitarian crises that may end up killing many more people just from disease or starvation.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 month ago

The Palestinian health ministry has reported 40,000+ Palestinian dead.

That only counts people who get found, obviously it doesn't count the tens of thousands who are dead or dying under the rubbel. The real number is probably an order of magnitude higher.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Not to detract from your point, but the real number of deaths in Gaza is estimated to be between 100-200 thousand.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ensign_Crab 13 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (2 children)

Trump's response to covid. Putin's entire career. Kim Jong Un's slow starvation of his entire fucking nation. But Netanyahu is up there and we should stop letting him write our foreign policy.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Honestly, yeah. Whoever is running the genocide in Sudan, probably.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] nutsack 31 points 1 month ago

"He's doing a good job,"

thanks, Hitler

[–] jordanlund 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Trump wants, and largely has, the "Nuke 'em all and let God sort 'em out!" vote.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 month ago (1 children)

And yet, if comments on this site are to be believed, he's still also getting the, "We refuse to vote Democrat because we're against the genocide!" crowd (sorry guys, but not voting or voting third party is a vote for Trump. You cannot escape it).

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago (30 children)

True. I think it's more about whether Harris can pull in the "genocide bad" folks, or loses them to third-party protest votes. Of course if any of those folks were paying attention to the crap coming out of Trump's mouth, they'd understand how much worse Trump will be. I had folks (hexbear and .ml of course) on a different post telling me that not only would Harris and Trump be the same on this, but that Harris would actually be worse. And of course they're willfully ignoring how bad Trump would be on everything else.

I have a suspicion that part of what's pushing Harris' campaign strategy right now to focus on courting more "centrists" is that they know whatever she did to appeal to the left that's not voting for her would never be enough to satisfy them. Far easier to court the middle with straightforward messaging than to appeal to a voting bloc that is already determined to hate anyone that's not as chaotic as they are.

load more comments (30 replies)
[–] DarkCloud 22 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

If you're exceptionally fascist, Trump will allot you extra praise. This is earnest as well - it's because he was mentored by a fascist type personality in Roy Cohn - and raised by a ruthless racist Capitalist in the form of his father who refused to rent his properties to black people (putting a 'c' on their applications to indicate they were people of color).

[–] Sam_Bass 16 points 1 month ago

Disconnection From Reality #29874

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 month ago

God. I can't believe how the bots are shifting the Overton window and how successful they are.

load more comments
view more: next ›