unrelatedkeg

joined 9 months ago
[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 months ago

Don't forget waiting for hours, going to the toilet for a leak and returning to see you've been skipped

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 months ago

I swear I've seen this meme somewhere with a Cybertruck instead of a Wrangler

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 months ago

Or "protect and serve their egos". Implies both their own egos and those of the higher class

[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 months ago

Kind of unrelated, but couldn't this be prosecuted (among other things) on 4th amendment grounds, as I doubt "threathening people with a stick" isn't protected (assuming qualified immunity otherwise) Although I doubt the curent SCOTUS lineup would come to any sensible decision on any matter.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 3 months ago
[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

About thinness: I also like my phones bendy and snappy (iPhone 6), as well as exploding batteries (Galaxy Note 7 or 10, I don't remember the exact model tbh).

Or you have to 'hold it right' (OG iPhone).

These were all huge issues that could be fixed without sacrificing the thinness.

Thinness shouldn't be used as an excuse for otherwise shitty phones, since it's clearly a non-sequitur.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Both are, or at least should be, ridiculous.

Yes, an app costs money. Yes, servers do cost money. But do they need to use servers? No. For example, self-hosting. Or just connecting the car to the cellular network (which they already do, mind you) and just let the phone talk to it directly, no manufacturer server required. Just pay an ISP for cell service and you're set. Are there problems with such a solution security-wise? Yes. And while I'm not an expert in cybersecurity I think the risks are about the same for this and a server model.

Hell, they might not even use servers for anything other than checking if you've paid your subscription in order to lower costs already (as if a few thousand unlock requests a minute couldn't be managed without a problem on a Raspberry Pi). They don't need some huge, expensive and power-hungr supercomputer for that, so I don't see a need for such a steep price.

Are the features useful? Absolutely. Would someone be willing to pay this price? Also absolutely. But the festures objectively don't cost that much to maintain and competition should and could put an end to it.

It's just corporate greed, and it feels to me as if we're getting closer and closer to the fabled oxygen subscription, and we have to call manufacturers out on their bullshit while we still have air to breathe.

Just don't buy their cars or at least their subscriptions. Get your car 'jailbreaked'. What will they do, remote disable it? I think we're still not that far down the dystopia plotline that a boycott couldn't work.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago (9 children)

Your oxygen subscription expires in 2 weeks. Please take note that absence of oxygen leads to hypoxia. Due to the detrimental effects of the war in Ukraine we have been forced to increase prices by 420%. Would you like to extend your subscription?

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago

If an employer can't 'afford' to pay you properly he shouldn't run a business.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (3 children)
[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Curious: is that some ancient convention that just stuck around, prescribed in some old standard, or a Wibdows-specific thing?

view more: next ›