this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2024
433 points (99.5% liked)

Today I Learned

17678 readers
388 users here now

What did you learn today? Share it with us!

We learn something new every day. This is a community dedicated to informing each other and helping to spread knowledge.

The rules for posting and commenting, besides the rules defined here for lemmy.world, are as follows:

Rules (interactive)


Rule 1- All posts must begin with TIL. Linking to a source of info is optional, but highly recommended as it helps to spark discussion.

** Posts must be about an actual fact that you have learned, but it doesn't matter if you learned it today. See Rule 6 for all exceptions.**



Rule 2- Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material.

Your post subject cannot be illegal or NSFW material. You will be warned first, banned second.



Rule 3- Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here.

Do not seek mental, medical and professional help here. Breaking this rule will not get you or your post removed, but it will put you at risk, and possibly in danger.



Rule 4- No self promotion or upvote-farming of any kind.

That's it.



Rule 5- No baiting or sealioning or promoting an agenda.

Posts and comments which, instead of being of an innocuous nature, are specifically intended (based on reports and in the opinion of our crack moderation team) to bait users into ideological wars on charged political topics will be removed and the authors warned - or banned - depending on severity.



Rule 6- Regarding non-TIL posts.

Provided it is about the community itself, you may post non-TIL posts using the [META] tag on your post title.



Rule 7- You can't harass or disturb other members.

If you vocally harass or discriminate against any individual member, you will be removed.

Likewise, if you are a member, sympathiser or a resemblant of a movement that is known to largely hate, mock, discriminate against, and/or want to take lives of a group of people, and you were provably vocal about your hate, then you will be banned on sight.

For further explanation, clarification and feedback about this rule, you may follow this link.



Rule 8- All comments should try to stay relevant to their parent content.



Rule 9- Reposts from other platforms are not allowed.

Let everyone have their own content.



Rule 10- Majority of bots aren't allowed to participate here.

Unless included in our Whitelist for Bots, your bot will not be allowed to participate in this community. To have your bot whitelisted, please contact the moderators for a short review.



Partnered Communities

You can view our partnered communities list by following this link. To partner with our community and be included, you are free to message the moderators or comment on a pinned post.

Community Moderation

For inquiry on becoming a moderator of this community, you may comment on the pinned post of the time, or simply shoot a message to the current moderators.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] 9point6 124 points 2 months ago (5 children)

Holy shit, one kilo of butter from 60kg of coal?!

That's some pretty spenny butter for "agreeable taste"

[–] [email protected] 28 points 2 months ago

"The Germans preferred Ersatz."

(Or at least that's how I remember that quote from Catch-22 when I read it 25 years ago...)

[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Especially when they had problems getting the coal they could mine, where it needed to be used.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago

You might be surprised what the material and energetic footprint of dairy is.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

i wonder how much emissions turning coal to butter creates. Maybe we should turn world's coal to butter so planetkillhappy bastards cant burn it.

[–] 9point6 11 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Given it seems to generate 59kg of waste product, I don't think it is going to be that great for the environment

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Buffman 96 points 2 months ago
[–] [email protected] 93 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I know a girl who thinks of ghosts,

She'll make you breakfast, she'll make you toast.

But she don't use butter.

And she don't use cheese.

She don't use jelly, or any of these.

She uses Coooooooooaaaaaal

[–] CodexArcanum 14 points 2 months ago

I'm dying (from eating carcinogens?) from laughter here! Brilliant!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 69 points 2 months ago (5 children)

it's funny seeing people struggle to handle the fact that we and our food is primarily made of carbon and hydrogen, which is exactly what coal and other fossil fuels are made of as well.

this, and margarine in general, aren't some horrid "chemical" product, it's just carbon and hydrogen (and some other stuff) assembled into fat!

[–] Fedizen 26 points 2 months ago (1 children)

The problem with a lot of synthetics it produces molecules that are chirally or structurally different from the target molecules. People forget like WW2 is like 10-15 years after a bunch of people were poisoned by "wonder supplements" like radium. People should be skeptical of a WW2 recipe.

[–] RememberTheApollo_ 13 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Ok, let’s not compare something objectively bad for you like consuming energetic ionizing radiation and a hydrocarbon made from an objectionable fossil fuel.

They’re still trying to make things with coal, like protein, and of course butter and margarine. I could find no references to chirality of molecules in coal “butter”, only that the difficulty in separating out the unwanted things like gasoline make the process inefficient and difficult.

And we’re not done with people consuming stupid things under the auspices of it being healthy for you. Doesn’t matter if it’s “polarized water” or consuming dewormer to ward off covid, people at perfectly happy to do dumb things.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

Nile Red has a lot of videos that show these concepts and the power of chemistry and what you can do with it if you have enough understanding.

https://youtu.be/NIVkBs7oWDI

I wish I had scene videos like these in high school. It would have made chemistry so much less abstract.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] halowpeano 6 points 2 months ago

I envy the faith you have in process and quality control, especially knowing these products are produced by the profit seeking capitalist class who definitely do NOT feed it to their own families.

[–] Allonzee 6 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

We eat the same stuff we're made out of?!

Impossibru!

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds better than Soylent Green. Because that's made of people

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 68 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

"I can't believe it's coal!"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 58 points 2 months ago

“Nutritious and of agreeable taste” seems like such a German way to describe it

[–] [email protected] 48 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Sounds like a NileRed video.

[–] cm0002 29 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wish he'd make a video on how to remove aspartame from diet soda and replace it with regular sugar so I can finally drink this stupid hard mountain dew I bought before I realized they idiotically ONLY released it in nasty zero sugar flavors

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm the exact opposite actually. I never liked the taste of regular coke, too sweet, so I've been drinking Diet Coke since I was a kid. Drink a couple of liters per week (although I've cut down since inflation has made it cost as much as liquid gold). I dislike the fake sweet flavor of Coke Zero, but I love the more refreshing taste of Diet Coke. It's like sparkling water with caffeine.

I do realize the taste of Diet Coke varies quite a lot over the world, but in Western Europe it tastes perfect for me.

[–] cm0002 16 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I like regular "Mexican" coke we have here in the states, ig Coca-cola reduces the sugar used in Latin-america or something.

But I can taste the aspartame immediately and it disgusts me. It doesn't come across as a "sugar, but less sweet" it comes across as "Trying to be sugar but tastes like a metallic chemical compound instead"

[–] Nutteman 24 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Mexican coke has cane sugar instead of corn syrup, which is the main factor in it being better.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

HFCS, specifically, which is very different from corn syrup.

Corn syrup is about 60% as sweet as sugar, by weight. HFCS is more sweet by weight, (if I remember right), because of the concentration of fructose.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 months ago (6 children)

what is the deal with people saying aspartame is nasty? it tastes slightly different from sugar lol

[–] dejected_warp_core 7 points 2 months ago

To me, aspartame tastes plastic-y and reminds me of how hot asphalt smells. It has more of a chemical taste than a sweet one. Toothpaste gets a pass only because of all the mint that masks it.

Sucralose (Splenda) can taste rather like aspirin in the right concentration. Again, it's "sweet" in a way but isn't quite right.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 2 months ago (1 children)

60kg of coal to make 1kg of margarine!

I don't know the chemistry behind it, but I suspect even if I did I wouldn't want to eat it

[–] auzy 32 points 2 months ago

Given how many people here in Australia love to suck up to coal and petrol companies, I suspect they would want to

[–] expatriado 16 points 2 months ago (14 children)

i am assuming they used some loose definition of nutritious

load more comments (14 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee 16 points 2 months ago (2 children)

During ww2 the alternative was hunger

[–] BleatingZombie 5 points 2 months ago

For reference see the British WW2 delicacy "Toast Sandwich"

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] psycho_driver 10 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Margarine was synthesized as cattle food but deemed too unhealthy for them to eat.

[–] CrayonRosary 16 points 2 months ago

This article about margarine doesn't say that, and contradicts that. I've seen videos that agree it was originally made for humans.

After the French Emperor Napoleon III issued a challenge to create a butter-substitute from beef tallow for the armed forces and lower classes, Hippolyte Mège-Mouriès invented margarine in 1869.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

...Okay... What does that have to do with humans eating it?

[–] GeneralEmergency 6 points 2 months ago

"Something something capitalism"

Something like that knowing this place.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 2 months ago

I wonder if the concept of “plastip” in Future Boy Conan came from this. They recycle it into food, weapons, and fuel.

[–] merari42 5 points 2 months ago (6 children)

If you make it from coal it is vegan because coal is just plants. If it's made from petroleum it is not vegan because it is made from dinosaurs.

[–] CarbonatedPastaSauce 29 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (6 children)

made from dinosaurs

False, it's from trees that grew, died, and fell down into piles and got buried, for millions upon millions of years, before anything on the planet evolved to eat their corpses.

edit: Seems I was working off outdated knowledge. Apparently scientists currently believe that almost all of our oil came from microscopic aquatic life such as algae and plankton. It still ain't dinosaur juice though!

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

Petroleum is also from plants/algea/bacteria/etc. All fossil fuels come non-animal living things things.

[–] Fondots 16 points 2 months ago

In general my understanding is coal was trees, oil was mostly algae and plankton, and mostly started forming well before the first true dinosaurs.

Technically some of that plankton would be considered animals, though probably not something you'd easily recognize as being an animal (side-note: I'd be curious to hear some vegetarians/vegans weigh in on the theoretical ethics of eating zooplankton)

I'm sure there's some edge cases, traces of more complex animals and such getting mixed in with dead plankton, and at the end of the day carbon is carbon regardless of where it comes from

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›