CrayonRosary

joined 2 years ago
[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 2 hours ago
[–] CrayonRosary 2 points 7 hours ago

Sure, but doesn't that imply the other direction is possible, too?

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 7 hours ago

That's the max range. You get +1 from Projecting, and +300% from Smite. So a range of 5.

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

Moon and Mars have less gravity, so they have no atmosphere.

That's part of it, sure, but they also don't have a magnetosphere, which blocks the solar radiation from blasting away the atmosphere.

Mars used to have a thicker atmosphere, but the lack of a magnetosphere meant it eventually blew away.

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

But it's supposed to... ? This version of Pixel Dungeon is "Shattered Pixel". Evan even uses a shattered pixel as the icon for the about button on the home screen, and also in the patch notes.

To be fair, people often just call it "Shattered", and it's definitely a branch of Pixel Dungeon. I think the ambiguity of the wording is maybe part of the point.

[–] CrayonRosary 2 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

I think you're on the right track. I think separating the sentences would make it more clear. And not using the word "trigger" since it's ambiguous.

Here's one attempt at clarifying it.

The Priest can cast Guiding Light for free once every 100 turns. Allies, wands, and some artifacts will now remove the Illumination debuff while causing bonus damage equal to their level.

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

Wow, you just doubled down rather than showing me even a shred of understanding of my perspective...

People like you only deserve to be blocked.

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 14 hours ago (3 children)

Saying "Try learning some X" the way you did is an insult. That's not a polite way to refute someone's comment. It's just like saying "you're ignorant".

If you had simply said your first sentence about the harmonics and left it at that, I would have replied, "Oh yeah, okay, that's a good point."

Instead, you were a dick about it. Just letting you know how those words come across on the internet. Maybe you wouldn't take those same words that way if they were said to you, but I did, and so would lots of other people.

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 14 hours ago (5 children)

Wow, being a dick much? How in the world did my reply offend you?

[–] CrayonRosary 1 points 15 hours ago (7 children)

Sure, it might need to be a completely different algorithm to be able to maintain pitch and clarity at that speed. I've seen 3X in podcast apps, but I've never seen 4X.

[–] CrayonRosary 3 points 15 hours ago

I imagine speed limits will be put on DMs at some point in the future. There's no reason to have it wide open so you can firehose multiple people with the same message.

Like, if you're sending a message to someone and they reply back, you can immediately reply back, back-and-forth, as fast as you want. Other than that, you should only be able to send a message once every five or ten minutes.

[–] CrayonRosary 4 points 16 hours ago (2 children)

Sure, but did you at least add context about why you're messaging them? Like some comment or post they made that you liked and you wanted to talk about similar stuff?

Because that would be kind of normal. That's what private messages are for. But this one is just bait.

 
 

I just walked past a Prison Guard who was in deep sleep from a while ago. Out of the shadows came another Prison Guard, so I cast Sunray on him and then threw a spear by double-tapping the quickslot, assuming it would target the one I had just targeted with a spell, but I instead turned around and threw it at the sleeping one.

This is very counterintuitive. Casting a targetted spell at any enemy should make them my current target for other spells, wands, and throwables.

I have the same issue with Guiding Light.

 

A man can dream...

20
submitted 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago) by CrayonRosary to c/pixeldungeon
 

You can't miss, so you benefit from the heavy War Scythe damage with no drawback. And look at that range!

It's also excellent with Sunray's blind effect for two surprise attacks! Once when they are two spaces away and again when they are adjacent.

I found it as +2, used a stone, and got Projecting. I feel lucky. I'm actually a Wand of Living Earth build because I wanted to try all the ally buffs, but this War Scythe let's me safely do some serious melee damage.

And it's even better when my Golem is distracting an enemy. I can blind the enemy from 2 tiles away and get up to 6 surprise attacks. This is truly an excellent combination on a Paladin.

11
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by CrayonRosary to c/pixeldungeon
 

The run was going awesome! +2 Blazing Hand Axe on a statue, +1 Leather from the Ghost, and wand of Lightning just sitting on the floor (cursed but also a Scroll of Remove Curse) All on floor 2. Then I died a minute later...

I jumped into a well room and spawned the wraith. Rather than hit it with my Cleric spell, I stupidly zapped it with my Wand of Lightning at point blank range while at 3 HP. ☠️ Literally killed myself. Could have drank my water after jumping. Didn't. Could have passed a few turns to digest. Didn't.

The seed was such a good start that decided to copy the seed and try again. (DNK-CWK-VJR, btw)

And then I died a second time within 6 tiles of my first death! I was at 2 HP and starving put me at 1, so I ate food. Why use my water when I can heal from food, right? Well, I forgot how long it takes to eat food and the snake in the room reached me and killed me.

Time for a third try! It was such a great start. I want to see how the rest of the seed turns out.

 

Much appreciated!

 

What's the deal? I'm testing using https://coveryourtracks.eff.org Is it truly unique (and repeatable), or is it perhaps being randomized on every request?

I've tried normal Firefox, Mull, and IronFox. With and without jShelter.

I'm using my phone. Stock Android on a Pixel 7 Pro.

In DDG Browser I have a "nearly unique" fingerprint.

I installed CanvasBlocker and disabled privacy.resistFingerprinting in IronFox (since CanvasBlocker said to), and my fingerprint is still unique. I guess I'm not surprised since I think CanvasBlocker is designed to randomize canvas fingerprinting.

Any tips on having even a shred of privacy when browsing the web on Android?

Update

The biggest identifying characteristics are screen size and user agent. User agent can be faked with an extension. I can't exactly change my screen size.

I don't know what exactly what I did, but I managed to improve to "nearly unique" in IronFox. I think all I did was install Cookie Autodelete. It's an extension I've used for a long time in Mull, and finally got around to installing it. Then I installed "User-agent Switcher" and chose a Chrome user-agent and now I'm back to "Unique". 🤔

EFF mentioned Tor Browser having some other best anti-fingerprinting, so I tried installing that. "Unique Fingerprint". Again, maybe that's fine if it means it's randomized on every request. Does anyone know if that's the case? If part of the fingerprint is a hash of canvas data and WebGL data, etc. Then I can easily see your fingerprint being unique if a browser or an extension is intentionally fuzzing that data.

Update 2

I tried Fennec with just jShelter, uBlock Origin, and Cookie AutoDelete (not that I think those last two matter).

Obtained a "randomized fingerprint" result. Success?

 

It's been happening for a while.

Here is the source of the above screenshot:

Wonder how much that stomach acid cares about the Alkaline^®^ topper. 
 
 

Spoiler

 
 
view more: next ›