this post was submitted on 03 Feb 2024
383 points (96.4% liked)

World News

37437 readers
4886 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News [email protected]

Politics [email protected]

World Politics [email protected]


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
all 49 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] itsathursday 86 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (2 children)

Their economy is never in decline, never deciduous, always ever grand.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 5 months ago (3 children)

Well, they did invented the term "negative growth"

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

The economy has grown back to 2007 levels!

[–] [email protected] 5 points 5 months ago

How doubleplusungood.

[–] afraid_of_zombies -1 points 5 months ago

Negative GROWTH means they cancel out and you get nothing.

Which I guess now that I am saying it I realize it might not be them lying or even wrong.

[–] captainjaneway 3 points 5 months ago

Do you know that China is in decline? Yeah. Oh, God, they practically invented decline.

[–] carl_dungeon 35 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Winnie doesn’t want people to know their economic system is in no way sustainable?

[–] [email protected] 28 points 5 months ago (2 children)

To be fair, neither is Western capitalism considering the environmental costs

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Sure, but China suffers from enormous environmental cost as well (cement is ridiculously terrible for the environment; now think about what drives most of their paper growth), under an inherently unstable hybrid between market capitalism and state economy, coupled with what can only be described as a demographic WMD, an erratic leadership that, through purges after purges after purges, is busy erasing even the pretense that it's operating under technocratic principles - and on top of that, you get these heave-handed attempts at information control. The latter in particular has never ever worked at making people forget that the economy is on a downwards trajectory with absolutely no sign of even slowing down, let alone a solution that doesn't involve launching a major war in Asia in the hopes that rallying around the flag will somehow prevent the whole house of cards the CCP has been busy building over the last couple of decades from crashing down.

Xi inherited many of the issues China is suffering from, but he also inherited a nation that was slowly opening itself and reversed that course almost from day one. Instead of realizing the untapped potential the emerging Chinese civil society had, he only saw it as a threat and clamped down on it through positively Maoist measures. He has also done everything in his power to make the economic situation worse, all in the name of securing his rule and that of his party (in that order). Xi's answer to economic woes and the demographic decline is mass slavery, which I feel the world will finally stop accepting the moment China oversteps its bounds towards the outside. A war against Taiwan would do it, but I feel like even a major escalation in their (at this point) ten dash line imperialism, perhaps against Japan, could be enough to trigger substantial backlash.

[–] banneryear1868 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

In 1971 there was an oil crisis that put an end to the post-war consensus in the US, and the deindustrialization that followed was a shift to a more professional service financial economy. In China Mao had died and the Cultural Revolution was over. Deng opened up the country to capitalism through a Soviet-style manufacturing push and the creation of economic zones. So we have this relationship between the world's largest consumer economy and the world's largest manufacturing economy up to the present day. China's economic growth currently is outpacing other developed countries post-covid, and they represent a greater percentage of worldwide economic growth than the US, they have the single largest share of the world's economic growth.

People in the US who criticize China for polluting is incredibly ironic in this context. US capital interests are more than happy to exploit China's manufacturing sector, and China takes the blame for all the things that brings with it.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 5 months ago (1 children)

China’s economic growth

How much of this is growth comes from construction? How can we know we can trust the numbers out of China?

[–] banneryear1868 2 points 5 months ago

Begs the question of how you're substantiating any claims if you can't trust any information to base it on. Use a critical US report on China's economy if you want. A granular distribution of GDP by economic sector is the data you're asking about, a legit resource will serve you better than a random internet commenter. You'll find their service economy is where the percentage share of growth has been wherever you look.

[–] carl_dungeon 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

That’s true too! But we’re not hiding it at least.

[–] MotoAsh 4 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Ehh... Gas companies knew about global warming since the 50s and Congress since the 70s.

We're ignoring it, too.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

The time we learned about global warming to now is longer than the time we started using fossil fuels to the time we predicted global warming. And we're pretty close to what they predicted way back then

There's an xkcd on it, I saw it the other day but I can't find it now

[–] Everythingispenguins 30 points 5 months ago
[–] [email protected] 29 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yeah well fuck them. The insistence on outright lying and deceit is a huge reason I detest the CCP.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

hey they only lie because they're corrupt.. and incompetent..

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago

if you invested in anything they built and expected them to keep honest books, yessir

[–] Stanwich 24 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Oooooooohhhhhh dear. Empty honey pot 🐻

[–] [email protected] 9 points 5 months ago
[–] hark 21 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Bunch of amateurs. Don't they know that the proper approach is to flood the internet with articles of "the economy is doing amazing, you peasants just don't know it"?

[–] afraid_of_zombies 2 points 5 months ago

I swear I have seen the same headline hundreds of times in my life.

[–] Linkerbaan 20 points 5 months ago (2 children)

The economy is just a vibe. No bad vibes allowed.

[–] BeMoreCareful 4 points 5 months ago

Isn't that sort of a thing?

[–] nutsack -1 points 5 months ago

how dare you mention cardio in my house

[–] NOT_RICK 17 points 5 months ago

That’ll fix it!

[–] MonsterMonster 16 points 5 months ago

What's that you say? The Chinese economy is collapsing?

[–] daikiki 11 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

If you don't tell the people they're starving, how could they possibly know?

[–] occhionaut 9 points 5 months ago

Every day i wake up and take a shower watching a youtube video about how China is falling apart at the seams internally and it really lightens up my mood!

[–] gennygameshark 9 points 5 months ago

Good luck, Pooh bear...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 5 months ago

Yep, that will fix the underlying weakness! /s

This and things like banning short sells are bad news on two fronts, in that they both reveal a problem and will be ineffective at solving it.

[–] PeckerBrown 7 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Xittie the Poo's got a turd in his hunny and he's pissy.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)
[–] occhionaut 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Xi Jinping, chairman of the communist party of china

[–] [email protected] 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I'm just confused, it's usually Xinnie (from Winnie). Wondering what the significance of the T is

[–] occhionaut 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Think it's a triple portmanteau of "Xi", "Winnie", and "Shitty"

[–] [email protected] 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

but that one ~~bot~~ poster told me China is getting more powerful and the Yuan will replace the Dollar.

Any day now

[–] [email protected] 6 points 5 months ago

China economy #1!

[–] afraid_of_zombies 5 points 5 months ago

You are making it too complicated Winnie the Pooh. Just do what we do in the West. Hire a bunch of economists to go on the TeeVee or in dead tree media and tell everyone that all is fine.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 5 months ago

This is the best summary I could come up with:


Reports this week from The New York Times and The Wall Street Journal detail efforts by Chinese authorities to scrub the internet of negative takes on the state of its economy.

According to the NYT, The Ministry of State Security said in its official WeChat account that citizens should not believe the "false narratives" about the trajectory of China, and instead should believe in President Xi Jinping's vision.

Meanwhile, officials continue to espouse an upbeat outlook for growth this year, even as the economy grapples with a cocktail of bearish headwinds including a troubled real estate sector, crashing stocks, deflation, and youth unemployment.

In one example cited by The WSJ, an article from a Beijing-based outlet that called for more direct state intervention in addressing economic challenges was erased from the website within hours of publishing.

That, too, disappeared shortly after it was published, and on WeChat, a message appeared to those trying to access it on Li's account: "The content can't be viewed due to violation of regulations."

Experts have told Business Insider over recent weeks that the "uber-bearish" narrative on China has become entrenched, and that authorities have slim chances of engineering a rebound in the near term.


The original article contains 340 words, the summary contains 200 words. Saved 41%. I'm a bot and I'm open source!

[–] [email protected] 2 points 5 months ago

That’s how you know everything’s going great