That one was a joke
carl_dungeon
joined 2 years ago
I mean, we always have in the past. Native Americans, Japanese during wwII, waco
And doubly republican.
I feel like 98+ % is pretty good. I’m not an expert but I know over-fitting is something to watch out for.
As for inconsistency- man I’m not sure. You’d think it’d be 1 to 1 wouldn’t you with the same dataset. Perhaps the order of the input files isn’t the same between runs?
I know that when training you get diminishing returns on optimization and that there are MANY factors that affect performance and accuracy which can be really hard to guess.
I did some ML optimization tutorials a while back and you can iterate through algorithms and net sizes and graph the results to empirically find the optimal combinations for your data set. Then when you think you have it locked, you run your full training set with your dialed in parameters.
Keep us updated if you figure something out!
That’s because he’s a dick head
How much power could $36 million dollars worth of solar panels produce over 1 year I wonder? And then keep them going for 30 years? And another $180 million worth of panels over the next 5 years, and millions more in panels up to 2050? I feel like the power produced by an array that size over 30 years would far eclipse the value of what little carbon this will extract.
Could we not fuck up everyone’s morning by show this motherfucker’s dumb face?
No battery, no power adaptor, broken screen, $50 shipping. What a deal!
I can think of one in particular…
There’s no water in space though!
view more: next ›
Why would I trust someone that spends their life trying to understand reality and makes data driven predictions that help improve people’s lives? That’s crazy talk.