this post was submitted on 29 Nov 2023
427 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

59705 readers
5236 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Tech company has no data.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Eigerloft 133 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Uh oh, someone's commercial real estate investments must not be performing as well as they expected.

[–] SinningStromgald 59 points 1 year ago (1 children)

None are doing well. It's the next big bubble to pop and it's going to hurt real bad. Bidens plan to convert office space to residential sounds like a savior for commercial real estate but it will take years and not everyone can be at the front of the line.

[–] givesomefucks 38 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Bidens plan to convert office space to residential sounds like a savior for commercial real estate

For the owners....

He's giving them millions (I think actually billions) for them to make those office spaces trendy expensive condos most people won't be able to afford.

Rather than telling the disgustingly wealthy people that own those offices to pay for it themselves while prioritizing affordable housing for people who need it.

[–] [email protected] 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Trendy, expensive, poorly insulated, poorly suited, overly priced condos.

You can't easily convert open plan office space into suitable residential housing.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (9 replies)
[–] essteeyou 130 points 1 year ago (1 children)

When I worked at Amazon we had data for every little decision we made. Do you want to change the color of a button? Run an A/B test and see if it improves some metric.

Want to stop supporting a 5-year-old device? Go determine the total number of impacted people and figure out some way to compensate them.

Want to get promoted? Get 5 people you worked with to answer specific questions about your work over the last year.

Want to make an entire workforce return to an office after they kept your company afloat during a pandemic? Want to increase commute time? Want to increase cars on the road? Want to make new parents spend less time with their kids? No need for any data, some guy says he knows better.

[–] dubble_deee 14 points 1 year ago

These days all the data used to inform decisions internally feel like they're completely made up to support whatever bias the manager already has. This used to be an org dependent problem but it's everywhere now, AWS, retail, digital.

[–] NounsAndWords 106 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But I know it's better

Better for whom?

[–] BaronVonBort 70 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Micromanagers and building owners

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yep all those countless hours of travel, gallons of gas, car repairs, transit fares, etc we’ve been covering out of pocket our whole working lives has been a free subsidy to commercial real estate companies.

[–] [email protected] 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

It really is absurd.

I'm returning to the job market, and I'm honestly thinking of getting a shitty job within cycling distance, rather than be forced into commuting again.

I honestly don't know how much more they'd have to offer me, just to force me back in my car. It certainly won't be nothing or vague promises.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] roofuskit 30 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Board rooms full of people heavily invested in commercial real estate.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

People who have investments in:
• corporate real estate and companies like Blackrock, Concord Pacific and Amazon who easily own tens of billions of dollars of corporate real estate.
• downtown coffee shops that exist to ~~ripoff~~ serve otherwise stranded office workers.
• car and oil companies because all that rush hour traffic makes them money.
• road construction companies since rush hour traffic jams means easy bribing governments into paying billions for complex and frequently experimental road enhancements.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You forgot the governments who gave Amazon $5 billion in subsidies to have offices in their jurisdictions: https://qz.com/amazon-s-5-billion-discount-see-all-its-tax-cuts-and-1849821611

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] sonals 97 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Hey, I worked for this moron and left because of these moronic statements.

Absolutely mind boggling that this company is “run on data” yet there’s no data besides anecdotes to support this backwards idea.

To make it even funnier, here’s an Amazon Director apologizing on LinkedIn because they thought forcing people to come into an office was the right thing to do.

[–] partial_accumen 79 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Compromise is the moment a group has given up on finding the best solution

What a toxic and zero-sum viewpoint. What a stark admission that someone is unable to be willing to consider the possibility that someone else might be right, or at least partially right. If this philosophy was prevalent at Microsoft in 2010+, it would explain a number of Microsoft corporate decisions. Putting a smartphone touchscreen UI on a computer server product (Windows 2012) being just one obvious example.

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Strongly agree. If anything, compromise is necessary for finding the best solution for everyone, especially as we're all different.

That manager thinking that compromise is "giving up" needs to get out of the selfish delusion and come back to reality. Feel sorry for the subordinates!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] MysticKetchup 61 points 1 year ago (3 children)

If this dude "loved every minute of the 80+ hour work weeks of the early 2000's", feels like I can safely ignore anything he has to say about work

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

He was in his early 20s based on his stated age, bro-ing out with beers and code, likely making gobs of startup money when you could still reasonably buy a house, which is likely worth 10x what it was then.

Now he makes 700k or more, living in his basically free house, and needs to put on a show for current 20 somethings like that is something good that can still happen to them.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] afk_strats 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Working from home also had, from my observation, a massive and materially beneficial impact on females specifically working mothers, who bare a disproportionate share of domestic work.

Ew

[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every single time some dude writes "females" I see this.

[–] peopleproblems 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

What I don't get, is that, female clearly applies to any living species right?

Women refers to female humans.

It's so easy to say "women" because you are talking about people. The word "female" has no such implication.

I truly think the repetitive and serious use of "females" instead of women is actually an attempt at degrading the status of women in society.

But not like "oh its already bad" but more intentional now. It worries me, because there are a lot of political persons using the language too.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Saying "females" is just one step above saying "bitches." That's how it hits my ear at any rate.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

In business, all data are vanity metrics. If they make you look good, you slap that shit on everything; if they make you look bad, you "don't have it".

It's just that sometimes you can use negative data to make decisions that look good to those above you, and sometimes you know that you can't.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Hell, businesses might even keep asking you to keep changing criteria and numbers until they hear what they want to hear. I literally am dealing with this right now for a local retailer; they keep insisting that I keep changing criteria and numbers relating to how many sales they closed until they hear an answer they like. When I gave them the raw numbers, the owner and manager were straight-up in denial about it and said I was wrong and that the data is off because they felt it should have been a different number than presented.

Fucking frustrating and stupid, but that’s how upper management and corporate people can be apparently.

[–] [email protected] 92 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Over the last 15 years these tech leaders have led the charge to offshoring. Now they're telling us we have to work with people on the other side of the world - unless we're in the same timezone. Then we have to be "together" but separated into cubicles. Their logic makes no sense.

[–] GreenEnigma 43 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It’s because their logic isn’t about what they claim it’s about.

It’s about control.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You guys are getting cubicles? Living the dream.

[–] [email protected] 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I hear to really boost morale, we might get to wear jeans on Fridays. I mean, working from home is great, but have you ever gone into the office in non-business casual clothes?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] GuyWithLag 87 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Amazon is extremely data-centric at that management level. If he's not showing hard data, then the data he has go against the narrative he's pushing.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Which is confusing to me, obviously working from home tends to be more productive, and I'm sure they've seen that, so why RTO?

[–] Phoonzang 40 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because WFH has shown that large parts of middle management are useless, and those MM people are pushing upper management for RTO before it becomes evident. It's what MM has always done, suck up to UM and kick down on the workers, without real benefit to the company.

[–] assassin_aragorn 12 points 1 year ago

Not only MM, I think a lot of these execs would be shown as useless as well

[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Productivity must mean nothing when you've got a giant commercial real estate hole burning in your pocket.

Think of all the wasted money! (For the company, not the workers as they commute, buy lunch, hire nannies, etc)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] afk_strats 80 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is extremely typical for Amazon corporate.

They have the data because they ask (corporate) employees about their working experience constantly. I'm sure employees love the option to WFH. But they don't like the data (typical) because they spent billions building cheap, crowded, loud office space around the world.

So what do they do? They pull out the mantra, "Disagree and Commit", which is Amazon manager speak for "shut up and do what I say." Ironically, Disagree and Commit is actually "Have Backbone, Disagree and Commit" and is about finding alternative solutions or data when you think the company is doing the wrong things rather than keeping quiet.

Amazon, like most American corporations is an oligarchy and it's run terribly at the top with dire consequences for their employees, customers, and the world.

[–] scarabic 27 points 1 year ago (7 children)

cheap, crowded, loud office space

Just reading these words hurts. I’ll never forget visiting Fitbit’s offices. They had these extra narrow desks - imagine a regular office desk but without the extra width for that rolly-drawer. They were strung out in long rows, smack up against each other side to side. And the rows were also arranged back to back. When everyone was sitting down, the legs of their chairs would interfere, and they had nowhere to put their backpacks except down in that mess of chair legs. The place was a constant high volume din, and if it wasn’t you’d be listening to the people in either side of you breathing. Need to get up and leave? Prepare to tiptoe through that entire mess for 10-20 desks until you reach an aisle.

[–] afk_strats 28 points 1 year ago (2 children)
  1. that sounds like a fire hazard
  2. flu season was probably a nightmare
  3. fuck that
load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 51 points 1 year ago

'I don't have data to back it up, but I know it's better'

This is exactly the reason why every single one of Amazon's products are shittier today than they were yesterday.

[–] CaptPretentious 48 points 1 year ago

You know what time it is... For Amazon to actually pay taxes.

[–] xantoxis 44 points 1 year ago

It's time to flay the skin from Amazon executives. I don't have the data to back it up, but I know it's better.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 year ago

Just a reminder that if you commute by car it's probably the most dangerous thing you do every day. This guy is literally saying "I have no data but I want you to risk your lives and waste your money twice a day."

[–] [email protected] 42 points 1 year ago

Bro, trust me bro - dumb AF execs.

[–] foggy 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Go chat with Google Bard about work from home vs return to office. Bard is not a fan of WFH. Strange!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vanveen 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I read a lot of comments of angry, rightfully angry, people toward Amazon and its exploitative work policy. I do not buy from Amazon since 2012; I've thrown away my Kindle and told myself F**k that predator. (You cannot hire workforce that has to live with food stamps because your wage isn't enough, I mean, how corrupt one must be to do something like that?)

I wonder how many of you are actually boycotting Amazon? Out of curiosity. I'm Italian and I am petrified that here is imported the Amazon model. And I'll fight with all the energy to stop this Hun who, btw, does not pay taxes. It's immoral and it's unexplainable how his business can be legal.

[–] slumberlust 14 points 1 year ago

I'm doing the same, but must admit it feels fruitless sometimes. 99% of people will just lap up whatever shit is fed to them and ask for seconds.

Amazon has a serious customer trust issue. Their reviews are fake, their prices aren't competitive, their shipping promise is routinely broken, and you will likely receive a counterfeit product.

Do not order tech products from Amazon. Co-inventory means you will get whatever item the picker picks, not the store you order from.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 18 points 1 year ago

“Source: trust me, bro.”

[–] IphtashuFitz 15 points 1 year ago

My employer decided to close one of our biggest offices right when the pandemic hit, having everybody work from home. This office housed probably 75% of our engineering staff (software developers, QA, IT, etc). Our CEO made it clear that the plan was to be able to hire the best people from the tech sector that we could find, no matter where in the world they were located, and not have them feel left out by being the only remote employees.

The team that I’m on was all local prior to that decision. It now spans every US timezone and two other countries, and we are very good at what we do. I do miss seeing coworkers in person from time to time, but my employer provides us with all the tools we need to remain productive, including being very flexible about work hours, time off, etc. The company also encourages occasional social get-togethers for employees in the same geographic areas.

I personally haven’t set foot in an office since 2019. The company does now encourage people who are within an hour drive of an office to come in a couple times a month. The closest office to me is 2+ hours away.

I really wish executives like this dolt would actually do some real research on this subject and not just rely on gut feelings. Yeah, I know this wouldn’t work for every company, but ours can’t be the only one that’s quietly succeeding at it.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 1 year ago
[–] cabron_offsets 12 points 1 year ago
load more comments
view more: next ›