160
Trump voters feel very differently about things now that he’s won, our new poll shows
(www.politico.com)
American voters aren't exactly the smartest, are they?
this post was submitted on 28 Nov 2024
160 points (94.0% liked)
politics
19252 readers
1958 users here now
Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!
Rules:
- Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.
Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.
Example:
- Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
- Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
- No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
- Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
- No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning
We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.
All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.
That's all the rules!
Civic Links
• Congressional Awards Program
• Library of Congress Legislative Resources
• U.S. House of Representatives
Partnered Communities:
• News
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
Sorry, can't not laugh at the Freudian slip here.
But yeah, low-information and/or single-issue voters are a scourge.
Lol, yeah, case in point. Fixed.
The new American way would be to double down on the mistake and deride ptz for not being up to speed on this latest usage of ‘are’…
Apparently I was unaware that "are" is now considered a contronym. lol
It’s like how we now have to specify whether we’re using “literally” as a traditional or modern colloquialism, because the modern definition now encompasses “figuratively” 🫠
low-information voters
My candidate gave two multi-hour unscripted interviews. Did yours do that?
And which party was the one cutting education spending decades ago? They're reaping their rewards now.
I mean, they’ve won basically unfettered power, so yeah.
My in-laws are staying with us this week. Fortunately they both are reasonable and voted Kamala but I have heard nothing but Medicare advantage commercials every 5 minutes as they watch live tv (something we never do).
Medicare advantage is a huge scam that takes all your Medicare money and gives it to private insurance companies. It is shocking that we allow people to be bombarded with this day in and day out. It doesn’t surprise me this same group was bombarded with lies from the right for the past year. Lies that don’t match reality. And as those lies come to light, they will feel duped. But either it will be too late or they are too stubborn to admit it.
Yeah, some people are more vulnerable than others, and this is especially true if they are on social media.
I noticed that nearly everyone (perhaps all) in my circle who fell for MAGA were or still are in some kind of MLM.
Online, for example on Reddit looking at users who believe that you see that large portions of them are into crypto.
Trump voters right now:
The problem is that the whole world is sitting right next to the dinosaur.
Hilarious photo.
Honestly one of the better photos to come out of that comet pass
Non-Trump votes feel very different now that he's won.
I'm a lot less trusting of people. I thought I distrusted people before, but JFC, I had no idea how much lower that bar could go!
oh, we're not at the lowest yet unfortunately.
Wait until trump's admin actually starts up and all those people start supporting concentration camps for the migrants, LGBTQ+ members, and "political dissidents". Wait until a democratic/progressive congressperson gets assassinated and watch how they will give zero fucks about it and support doing more of that. Wait until they start actually getting hyper-violent in the streets, shooting people they think are the "enemy", and getting away with it scott free.
We have so much further to fall over the next 4 years. And all those people you distrust now, will be on the frontlines defending every one of those actions.
Yeah, I'm expecting the FBI to go back to the good ole days of killing "communists" and anyone who dares to say workers and minorities should have rights.
We have so much further to fall over the next 4 years
Oh you sweet summer child...
My apathy for anyone outside of my nuclear family is significantly higher than it was a few weeks ago. I'm just stocking up on masks, purell, and stuff for the coming year+ when a bird flu kills the yuckyucks and I can't buy tuna anymore because captain brain worms and the orange don't believe in science and will actively punish anyone who does for trying to get medicine. They saw their own covid response and went "hmm we did too much. Let's take more away" it's just mind boggling.
Wow. Election outcome affects feelings. Such insight.
Is this like Kevin in the first Home Alone thinking he's not really alone and just doing "bad" stuff and announcing it? Did they think their parents were going to come in and stop them and are surprised now?
would not surprise me if fraud or other shenanigans did determine the outcome.
I have no doubt Trump made every effort to cheat. There were attempts to keep people from voting, bomb threats, purging of voter rolls, and questionable access to voting machines.
But in the end, Trump won the election. He got more votes in more states, and he will be the President again.
That's who we are as a country. We elected Trump again. We need to stare at that in the mirror and acknowledge the uncomfortable truth about who we are if we're going to make it better.
America is not the bastion of freedom and justice for all anymore. We really haven't been for a very long time, and denial has allowed fascism to infect our collective subconscious.
We, the reasonable people, the ones who believe in freedom, equality, and the rule of law, we are the insurgency. The fox is in charge of the henhouse, and if we're going to survive it, we will have to fight for our country again. Our forefathers did it, and I believe we can, too.
I have no doubt Trump made every effort to cheat. There were attempts to keep people from voting, bomb threats, purging of voter rolls, and questionable access to voting machines.
Let's not forget Elon collecting signatures from demographics least likely to vote, or starlink being used in many districts as the network uplink for insecure machines, or the switch to computerized poll register systems using digital signature on a tablet (rather than a paper poll register) at many of these same polling places.
If you really wanted to juice your guy's vote numbers it wouldn't be all that hard to take the signatures you paid for and link them to people unlikely to vote, then get into vulnerable polling place systems and add bullet ballots for your guy ostensibly cast by people who are unlikely to actually show up.
Elon collecting signatures from demographics least likely to vote, or starlink being used in many districts as the network uplink for insecure machines
Are sources available on these claims, particularly the first one specifically it being the least likely voter demographic? I keep seeing this stuff talked about but also hand-waving that it's been debunked and I've been too wrapped up with life to investigate. I'm not hopeful that credible and clear evidence will show up enough to get widespread attention about vote hacking but I wouldn't be opposed to hearing more come out either.
Yea, even if they did cheat, I don't really care. Because it shouldn't have been close enough for that stuff to even matter. People keep calling him charismatic and all I can think is "have you actually heard the guy talk? He couldn't talk his way out of a paper bag." Seriously, if a guy on the street corner said the same things he's said you'd think he was an idiot, and you'd be right.
but we can't even look into it because we've established a political environment in which russian collusion is considered poor taste, rather than bad
Enjoy your $12 lettuce, fuckwits.
Enjoy your $12 Big Macs, fuckwits.
Like they're buying vegetables.
It goes on burgers
Technically
Voters’ perceptions of the economy are starting to flip along partisan lines
I mean, no shit. People act like partisanship is arbitrary, but it isn't. We fundamentally disagree about what economic policies, or even which economic systems are best. If you think unregulated, free-market capitalism is best, you're going to be happiest when the free-market capitalist party is in power. If you're a neoliberal, you're going to be happiest when the neoliberals are in power, if you're a social democrat, you're going to be happiest when the social democrats are in power. If you're a socialist, you're going to be happiest when the socialists are in power.
They also disagree on basic reality and thinks things are good because of Trump when Trump isn't even in power yet and things are exactly the same as yesterday. It's not just policy preference, or even regular politics, it's cult behavior.
they perceive things as better because right wing propaganda pumps people full of negative emotions so they'll vote right, and now that the election is over, they don't need to be made to feel scared all the time
I think things are better because the guy who was talking about the rates of chronic disease now gets to dictate health policy. I’m excited because the only politician to ever mention the issue most important to me — diet and health — just got elected.
if you think rfk is gonna make us all healthier with the powers of raw milk and no vaccines, i have a bridge i'd like to sell you. it goes to teribithia
The article doesn’t say people think the economy is better now. It just says they “feel better about” the economy.
Ok but why
Or you get even more nuanced and say unregulated free market is best only on the frontier of emerging new market sectors, and that areas we depend on should be heavily regulated, socialized, and run at cost for the public for free supported by tax dollars.
Have different systems for different things depending on which works best for what.
Noting should ever be completely unregulated. Humans are the worst.
Nuance is important, but it's also difficult for laypeople. Not because they're unintelligent, necessarily, but because they haven't studied and trained like experts have. That's why we have to be able to rely on experts. But, deferring to the authority of experts means giving up at least some power. I think that can work when there's trust between the experts and the laypeople, but when trust is lost, laypeople will no longer respect the authority of experts. That's what the experts, the "elites" have to understand: their expertise gives them authority, and with authority comes power, and, well, as uncle Ben would say, with power comes responsibility, and accountability. I don't think the experts of today take their responsibility seriously enough, nor do I think they take proper accountability.
I say it’s the opposite. Given that markets distribute more reliably and equitably than any other system including direct redistribution of goods and services, it should be considered more heinous to distort markets around things we need.
Healthcare and education are two markets that have been royally fucked (in terms of access to affordable options for poor people) by government attempts to do the opposite. We decide something’s too important to leave open, so we start dumping money into aid programs, and prices absolutely skyrocket.
Oh and housing too. Dems were talking about offering up to $X of down payment assistance on houses. Provide buyers with government money to help them buy this thing we’ve decided people cannot be without. Same thing we’ve been doing for decades in education and healthcare. Same thing that has driven both those markets into ridiculously high prices, and created massive ranks for debtors from the lower class in both of those.
Subsidized demand drives prices up. It closes the door to market access for lower income individuals and forces them to use the government assistance to get access.
Yeah I really believe this or any poll after this clusterfuck of an election.
I wonder how much they would howl if investigation(s) into the integrity of the vote were to be carried out (by serious people, I mean, not qanon qrazies like pillow guy).