Is this dumb denialism?
JustZ
He asks good questions. Curiosity killed the cat, though.
He's just smart enough to ask a good question and have an engaging interview, he's not smart enough to ever be informed by the answers.
If you don't use /s people just think you're stupid fyi.
He is another Russian asset. If the CIA could do their fucking jobs I'd be very greatful.
Every Trump supporter in my neighborhood is on the sexual offender registry, no joke. At first I thought "let's go Brandon" was some like NAMBLA rallying slogan because literally there are four sex offenders around the area and they were the only people two years ago with Trump and maga shit all over their dumpy little houses. I'd rather be in the bathroom with any trans person than any Republican.
The chambers will just not go to recess using pro forma sessions.
They do. Rightly so.
Oh I see what you're saying, I thought the term was more literal than you're suggesting.
I suppose the US president could launch a retaliatory strike based on a first strike that is still in the air, which is launch on warning, but the policy is to wait for a first strike and then have the president issue an order.
My understaning of launch on warning is any policy with no discretion, based on standing orders, not that it was necessarily strictly computer automated. The US policy is "hair trigger alert" which means that the strike systems are constantly in ready state, awaiting a valid order.
All I mean to say is that this is unlike the Russian system, which upon detecting an incoming missile issues valid, pre-approved orders to launch, with perhaps a human needed only to turn the key, but with no built in discretion once the pre-approved order is authenticated. The US does not have pre-approved launch orders.
Just pretend you're sure that reactionaries down voting a fact that makes them feel angry doesn't change the truth of the fact. I don't even need to imagine. The downvoted track with my experience: most people are dumbasses.