this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
1315 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

5511 readers
2916 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pyre 43 points 3 days ago (2 children)

it won't be though. spacex tech is massively reliant on NASA. if they do it they'll hurt spacex in the long run. which means they'll probably do it because musk is a fucking moron.

[–] Dasus 22 points 3 days ago (1 children)

"... in the long run"

These aren't people who understand what "in the long run" means.

[–] [email protected] 18 points 3 days ago

This quarters profits must be higher than last quarters. Fuck anything beyond that

[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Surely he'll strip NASA, put the bits he wants up for sale, then buy them for cheap.

Sure the best staff might leave, but he'll probably keep enough of the organisation to get something out of it.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] dustyData 195 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Remember when on Interstellar there's this whole prologue about the collapse of the US, the dismantling of NASA and the family getting on an argument with the school because the official stance now is that the moon landing never happened and mankind never went to space (despite there being still people alive who went there)?

So, anyway, life imitates art …

[–] thermal_shock 38 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 14 points 3 days ago

One of Trumps supporters even got punched by Buzz.

[–] CEbbinghaus 56 points 4 days ago

Recently there was a rerun of interstellar in IMAX at our local IMAX theatre. Rewatched it and had some pretty shocking revelations that I did not think of when I watched it for the first time. The rewriting of history being prime amongst them

[–] [email protected] 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

We ain't getting Interstellar, we're getting Don't Look Up.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 17 points 3 days ago

I remember when that movie came out people argued with me that the Democrats were the party that was going to create the world of Interstellar and the Republicans were "standing up for science".

It was obviously nonsense then so i have little illusions that those people have changed their view on it--or if they have, they've simply changed to believe the moon landing was faked.

[–] inv3r510n 19 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Trumps goons are going to sell out key functions of government to private buyers, like nasa to space x. This reminds me of when the USSR fell and all the shadiest people bought up the national industries.

I wonder who’s gonna buy the noaa. That’s the one I’m most concerned about.

[–] Hackworth 5 points 3 days ago
[–] [email protected] 61 points 3 days ago (2 children)

We saw what happened the last time space infrastructure was privatized.

Boeing gave all the money to the stockholders and delivered a criminally late product that ended up failing and stranding our astronauts. Boeing obviously didn't care to test if the Teflon in those thrusters could survive repeated heatings.

SpaceX decided to go backwards in rocket technology, from Hydrogen to Methane. Hydrogen is more efficient, and makes it easier to bury carbon responsibly. Sure, Boeing's rockets got made fun of for being leaky, but I think that might be Boeing more than Hydrogen at fault. Dirty Methane rockets were cheap, and could be built simple as they experienced less thermal variation without cryogenic fuel.

SpaceX undercut the competition and turned itself into a monopoly while Boeing threw their hand to the stockholders. Now SpaceX picks up the pieces of the game they upended.

NASA was supposed to manage a thriving marketplace, full of competition. Instead it managed its way to a monopolistic structure that a single entity may try to sieze.

Fun fact about autocratic structures like monopolies and dictatorships: they can't grow power themselves, they can only sieze power organized by others.

We need to build our next wave of structures in a distributed fashion such that the levers of power are not so concentrated that they may fall into the wrong hands.

Give the power to the people. All of them.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Space travel is exceptional in that you need an incredible amount of cooperation to get a project into space. The supply chains are insane, the component parts highly specialized and hugely expensive, and the range of expertise and knowledge required is simultaneously focused and intense and broad and varied. If human society ever does manage to transition to a genuine people power, space flight will be, to my knowledge, the very last thing we achieve, because it takes so many people working together to get it done. The scope of these projects makes you realise how easy it must have been to build the pyramids. Two brothers can build a plane that just about works, but to get a vehicle to orbit needs a city of people working together.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 3 days ago (1 children)

That's all the reason it should be easier to distribute power. More people to distribute it between!

Remember when we paid people to do those things directly?

We, the American people, paid a lot of people each a reasonable salary to get to the moon.

Privatized spaceflight has we, the American people, pay a single entity less total money (they can make it more efficient, of course!). This concentrates decision-making and power.

That vehicle going in to orbit needs a city to work together. I want my taxes to pay that city and the people in it, not Boeing's shareholders who aren't helping put the vehicle into orbit, not Musk to build a second smaller city in Texas he is king of.

Thank you for your points. I completely agree that we should be paying the workers on the ground who get us to space instead of the wealthy who claim to own it.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CM400 169 points 4 days ago (1 children)

NASA, like the post office, is such a public benefit that we should be funding it well.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 3 days ago

I don't think people understand how much value we get from NASA... Like, $7 for every dollar spent, or more, in economic benefit and technological advancements. So many solutions they have to come up with to make space flight possible are incredibly useful here on Earth too

Value that we won't get if we're paying a private company to do it

[–] Badeendje 131 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (12 children)

NASA does research. They push the boundaries corporations can't.

load more comments (12 replies)
[–] enbyecho 63 points 3 days ago (9 children)

I had a lengthy argument with someone that Musk couldn't possibly be kissing Trump's ass for money - he's a billionaire after all and "has all the money he needs". No no, Musk is doing this out of the goodness of his cold billionaire heart. Isn't it obvious?

Why are so many people so stupid? WHY?

[–] SkunkWorkz 35 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Elongated Muskrat is a billionaire who wants to become the first trillionaire. That’s what these people aren’t getting. It’s all just a game to him. He thinks that he lives in a simulation and everyone else is an NPC. He now wants to set a new high score.

[–] [email protected] 27 points 3 days ago

Ah yes, the essential personality traits to becoming the richest person: integrity, and stopping once you have all the money you need.

[–] [email protected] 12 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I had similar arguments and the synopsis is that people can't admit being wrong because it makes them look weak. It's a toxic masculinity and ego thing.

You basically double down on the bet and ride the boat right into hell over the waterfall.

Dead, but you never had to admit the other person was right about the waterfall!

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] jaggedrobotpubes 42 points 3 days ago (7 children)

Some other country is gonna have the new nasa, and the united states is going to fall even further behind. It'll just be a brain drain and most of it isn't going to go to space-x.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] [email protected] 52 points 3 days ago

And absolutely no one paying attention was shocked.

[–] [email protected] 64 points 4 days ago (6 children)

The challenging thing here is that NASA does have deep, systemic problems and is in need of some overhaul. SLS is a breathtakingly expensive boondoggle, lunar gateway has no reason to exist, Orion is underpowered and overweight, Mars Sample Return’s entire mission is in question, JWST was a decade behind schedule and an order of magnitude over budget, and the list goes on. Extreme risk-aversion and congressional meddling have resulted in a bureaucratic quagmire of an organization. It’s hard to find nasa projects that are going well.

Of course I don’t think a gorilla with a sledgehammer as we’re sadly going to see from Trump will make things any better, we need a surgeon with a scalpel.

[–] halcyoncmdr 117 points 4 days ago (5 children)

Most of the things you listed are directly related to Congressionally mandated specifics for funding those programs. The money is only there if NASA does it the way Congress dictates, not necessarily the way it should be done.

The entire SLS program is essentially a Congressional jobs and legacy aerospace grifting program post-Shuttle.

If Congress would. Keep their hands off, and just allocate budget, most of the issues would likely disappear since the people that actually know what's going on could make the decisions instead of a Congress critter that is an imbecile.

[–] Red_October 39 points 4 days ago (1 children)

It's the whole reason SLS is the train wreck it is. Congress wouldn't let them not keep shoveling money to the same people who made Space Shuttle parts. So instead of the best design possible, we got the best design using old parts.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] brucethemoose 24 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (3 children)

This is such a common theme.

There are huge systemic problems which the "establishment" will demonstratably not address and Trump appears to be the answer to many voters... but him effectively addressing them is a wild fantasy.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] raspberriesareyummy 12 points 3 days ago

NASA budget shouldn't matter on the scale that it does. It is <2% of the US military spendings

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] PugJesus 66 points 4 days ago (1 children)

God, I love how the incoming cabinet has zero redeeming qualities amongst them.

[–] GladiusB 18 points 4 days ago (1 children)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] danc4498 35 points 3 days ago (1 children)

He efficiently using the government to make himself richer. What more did anybody expect?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] finitebanjo 22 points 3 days ago

Space exploration certainly will be the final frontier, its the last thing this pathetic species will have ever worked on before blinking out of existence.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 26 points 3 days ago (2 children)

People poke fun of Musk as being a idiot. But he had us Kaiser Soze'd by pretending to be dumb so that he could implement his self-serving ideas.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 28 points 3 days ago

NASA has already sent out emails to their teams and contractors about what implications this can have on their departments. Shit’s bad.

[–] [email protected] 43 points 4 days ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] lemmus 34 points 3 days ago

This is what losing a space race looks like.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 3 days ago (5 children)

I wanna try something...

Ahem. Investors! I have the concept of a plan to put gigantic billboards in space that can be seen by half the planet at any given time. Give me money.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] mechoman444 13 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Space: the final (capitalistic) frontier.

[–] [email protected] 15 points 3 days ago

Humanity: Let's make a bunch of stories about how space capitalism has some really bad outcomes.

Also Humanity: That sound great! let's do that!

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 6 points 3 days ago

He makes Rogozin look competent

[–] gedaliyah 23 points 4 days ago

"Sure is a nice publicly funded and scientifically minded space program you got here. It would be a shame if anything happened to it."

[–] [email protected] 21 points 4 days ago (1 children)

Convenient? That was the whole plan with buying X all along, to get into politics, and this guy is still there keeping it relevant.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›