this post was submitted on 23 Nov 2024
1325 points (99.5% liked)

Political Memes

5541 readers
3135 users here now

Welcome to politcal memes!

These are our rules:

Be civilJokes are okay, but don’t intentionally harass or disturb any member of our community. Sexism, racism and bigotry are not allowed. Good faith argumentation only. No posts discouraging people to vote or shaming people for voting.

No misinformationDon’t post any intentional misinformation. When asked by mods, provide sources for any claims you make.

Posts should be memesRandom pictures do not qualify as memes. Relevance to politics is required.

No bots, spam or self-promotionFollow instance rules, ask for your bot to be allowed on this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] someguy3 12 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Depends where the funding goes! And then musk can take a cut.

[–] Badeendje 32 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Corporations cannot carry the risk involved. Because else it would be similar to the medicine industry, but there is no large market to sell to.

We're going to Mars is not something you can sell in a boardroom, because why? What is the ROI?

[–] someguy3 13 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What I'm saying is musk wants to divert all of the government funding from NASA to spacex. ROI is all the funding from the government, every year for decades. It's not a sell a product and profit model in the regular sense. And this way musk can personally take a cut of all that funding.

[–] Balthazar 3 points 1 week ago

He doesn't even need to take a cut. If more money is regularly flowing to SpaceX, the value of the company goes up, which means more money for Musk.

[–] AA5B -1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

SpaceX has been a huge success for NASA. For much less funding than NASA doing it themselves or a fraction of the cost of ULA, NASA has a very reliable and much cheaper medium launch vehicle launching much more frequently, and a heavy launcher pretty far in development.

This is great, turning “routine” space operations over to cheaper private companies, while focussing on research and stretching the envelope

[–] someguy3 8 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Easy to do when you pay people shit, don't care about things blowing up, when you get to build on the already established knowledge, and use their facilities. Government on the other hand could never allow anything to fail and had to forge the path.