this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
449 points (91.7% liked)

politics

19115 readers
3805 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Trump’s popular vote share has fallen below 50% to 49.94%, with Kamala Harris at 48.26%, narrowing his margin of victory.

Trump’s share of the popular vote is lower than Biden’s in 2020 (51.3%), Obama’s in 2012 (51.1%) and 2008 (52.9%), George W. Bush’s in 2004 (50.7%), George H.W. Bush’s in 1988 (53.2%), Reagan’s in 1984 (58.8%) and 1980 (50.7%), and Carter’s in 1976 (50.1%).

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

The numbers also give Democrats a reason to push back on Trump’s mandate claims, noting most Americans did not vote for him.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] damnedfurry 25 points 11 hours ago (2 children)

This is major league copium. The fact is that Trump's opponent got way more votes in 2020 than in 2024, and had the blue turnout in 2024 equaled what it was in 2020, he would not have won in 2024. Period.

[–] Bosht 6 points 8 hours ago

Yeah I'm really not sure why these conversations are still going on. It's painfully clear that Dems lost this election because of voter turnout.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 8 hours ago

At this point it's just sad to see the impotent denial of facts of some people. He won the election and the popular vote. End of story.

[–] BigBenis 16 points 11 hours ago

Great! We can relish the fact that he didn't win over the majority of Americans as our country descends into a fascist hellhole run by billionaires, war hawks and rapists.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago

The 2024 election results highlight Trump’s narrow victory and the need for Democrats to address their mistakes and build a diverse working-class coalition.

just to be clear, this isn't really a failing of the dems per say, not to say they didn't have issues, they did. But this was a global shift away from incumbency. This seems to be more of a response to covid and inflation more than anything else possibly could've influenced it.

Lucky break for trump, dems just have to come back stronger i guess.

[–] [email protected] 17 points 16 hours ago

You all need to get your "Fuck Trump" flags made and start driving around with them for the next 4 years.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

The only thing of note here is that since the winner got <50%, then I’m guessing 3rd party votes were slightly higher this election.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

1.7% in 2024.
1.9% in 2020.
5.7% in 2016.
1.7% in 2012.
1.4% in 2008.

2024 is not the outlier. It's mostly about how well the other major party candidate does.

[–] damnedfurry 3 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

So, 4% less in 2024 than in 2016, the last time he won. That by itself stands in pretty stark contrast to those who want to blame his victory on people who voted for a third party.

Trump won in 2024 chiefly because millions upon millions of Dems who voted in 2020 stayed home in 2024. That's the reality.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Angrywaffle2 19 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

That's still a win in the popular vote. He has a mandate.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago

It's a plurality and not a majority, pretty far from a mandate. It's a legal win.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] [email protected] 29 points 22 hours ago (6 children)

He still won the popular vote.

[–] SquatDingloid 20 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

By being less less poplar than he was last election, because the Dems were even less poplar

[–] [email protected] 11 points 19 hours ago (2 children)

What do poplar trees have to do with this ?

[–] [email protected] 8 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Their wood is too soft to stand up to the Republicans, the Democrats need something stronger, like oak or maple.

[–] MeaanBeaan 4 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

I kinda like the sound of Maplecrat.

[–] Furbag 5 points 11 hours ago

Ask not what your country can do for you, but what Yew can do for your country!

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 36 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

It won't matter. He, and his cultists, will continue to claim otherwise.

[–] LotrOrc 4 points 12 hours ago

I mean his vote share went down, he still has more votes than kamala.

So they don't need to say anything he still won the popular core

[–] AidsKitty 63 points 1 day ago (4 children)

This is a ridiculous argument. Orange man won the electoral college, got the most votes, won the senate, house of reps, the presidency, and the supreme court. What more is there to lose?

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 35 points 1 day ago (8 children)

Plenty of coping from the liberal corporate media, instead of admitting that liberals abandoned the working class to court the monied interests.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

idk why people keep yapping about abandoning the working class, it mostly just seems like a dogwhistle to a general dissatisfaction that never seems to go away.

People were doing the same shit before biden dropped out, saying they would support someone else, like kamala. That happened, and then they didn't.

how would the liberals court the working class? would electing a fucking immigrant factory worker do it? At what point does the working class actually go "you know what, i agree, i will vote for this person" because the problem is, you can't just put some guy in the seat, we did that with trump, it was a horrendous mistake, and trump should have some idea of how this stuff works.

You need someone politically educated and experienced, capable of representing the people, like biden. There's a reason he got so much legislation through the government, even with how polarized it is right now.

unless of course, you want to overthrow the government, and install a dictator. That would also work.

[–] TankovayaDiviziya 1 points 36 minutes ago* (last edited 31 minutes ago)

Bernie Sanders is correct that the Democrats abandoned the working class. I will be blunt and say that Lemmy has ironic bigotry and disdain on the people of colour and working class who voted for Trump. It is important to understand the other side even if you don't agree; that way you would know where they are coming from and sway them. Call Trump voters of all backgrounds racists, hillbillies, mysoginists, redneck, traitors, Uncle Toms or Uncle Hector; but people don't have jobs and crime rate is up. The former blue wall is now the orange Rust Belt that colours Trump. And it is taboo to say this but many places are indeed overwhelmed by too much immigration since those places don't have the infrastructure to support the sudden population increase. Chronically underfunded public services make locals and immigrants compete for school, jobs and hospital beds. Immigrants are blamed instead, when in fact it's the affluent middle and upper classes who keep voting against building more social housing and expanding health services because they don't want their property value to go down and/or pay more taxes. And frankly, I believe many Lemmy users fall into this class camp and don't want to admit we're part of the problem. Many of us are college-educated with higher economic mobility and earnings live in safe and affluent areas because we benefit from the new knowledge economy. We are not rubbing shoulders with working class folks who lost their traditional manufacturing jobs and not experiencing their every day struggle. So, we become detached from the real lived experiences of those left out and deprived of opportunities. We consign rural and de-industrialised Appalachian former workers as ignorant and racists, when in fact we're also being bigoted against them for dismissing their genuine feelings of not having anymore jobs left, and their community left rotting by offshoring and automation caused by mismanaged globalisation. Why else has protectionism returned to the political menu? Has no one asked this instead of simply saying autarky and protectionism is dumb and makes their favourite video-games more expensive?

Simply saying that the economy is doing better is not enough if the rest are not feeling it. Just because we're feeling cushy in our office job doesn't mean those in the Rust Belt are feeling the same. We would not say we're fine if we have cancer on the liver while the rest of the body don't.

There is no denying that there are outright bigotry, but many people are left behind by emerging new technology and job market trend. And the folks who are out of jobs who could not put food on the table is the stuff that dictators are made of. I did not say this, it was Franklin Roosevelt. He knows that desperate people are easily brainwashed and swayed. Tell me you have not been in a dark place on a personal level before and you have not had negative thoughts dominate? It's the same situation happening right now with the working class which manifest on the societal level.

If the mostly affluent Lemmy users, progressives and liberals realise this, then we can take back progressivism into the political spotlight. The same progressives who always call for empathy do not place the same to the blue collar, working class folks left behind economically. Progressives need to understand the people different from them. It is only right to learn even from the other side.

During the Great Depression, neighbours would buy their neighbouring farmers' property at a penny to prevent being possessed by uncallous bankers, and threaten auctioneers for not agreeing with the sale. Where is that solidarity right now?

load more comments (7 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 35 points 1 day ago (14 children)

Actually only 50% of us support the fat pedophile fascist.

load more comments (14 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›