this post was submitted on 06 Nov 2024
849 points (99.1% liked)

politics

19241 readers
3966 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Following Donald Trump’s election victory, Republicans are now openly embracing Project 2025, a policy agenda from The Heritage Foundation that outlines sweeping conservative reforms.

Despite Trump’s attempts to distance himself from the project during his campaign due to its extreme proposals—including expanded executive powers, a national abortion ban, stricter contraception limits, harsh immigration policies, and the elimination of agencies like the Department of Education—his allies quickly began celebrating its implementation.

Former Trump adviser Steve Bannon and commentator Matt Walsh publicly affirmed the agenda, signaling the GOP's commitment to enacting these controversial policies in Trump’s second term.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sanctus 360 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You had to live inside your own asshole to not know this was always the plan

[–] NegativeLookBehind 78 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Which is a grave offense with this new regime, because that means you’re gay with yourself.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

auto-gay

Sounds like a really bad transformers opponent.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] TrickDacy 38 points 1 month ago (1 children)

You just described like 38% of voters

[–] Frozengyro 32 points 1 month ago (4 children)
load more comments (4 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] uberdroog 258 points 1 month ago (7 children)

My mom, who voted tRump and is on public assistance, is gonna be very sad and not understand why.

[–] [email protected] 185 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Don't worry she'll find a way to blame Obama

[–] toomanypancakes 87 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Once she gets her benefits slashed be sure to talk about how great the Republicans are and isn't she glad she got what she wanted with her vote? Thank goodness trump got rid of that pesky public assistance, that was costing the rich real money.

[–] [email protected] 47 points 1 month ago

I plan on reminding every family member, at every opportunity, when they complain about some benefit they've lost, "tough shit, you specifically voted for this"

[–] linearchaos 65 points 1 month ago (3 children)

"but he's hurting the wrong people, tell him that, he must not know it!"

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Twentytwodividedby7 152 points 1 month ago (9 children)

Did anyone ACTUALLY believe they didn't?

[–] someguy3 52 points 1 month ago (10 children)

I've been listening to interviews and most people think Trump won't do what he says he will, much less something that he says he won't. It's unbelievable.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 48 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Sadly yes, I told many people about it and they all said "Trump's not going for it, he rejected it, that's just fear mongering"

Bastards

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] DontRedditMyLemmy 45 points 1 month ago (1 children)

One of my family members actually said that they wouldn't vote for P25. I told them it was a platform, not an item on a ballot... confused looks.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (6 replies)
[–] AnUnusualRelic 121 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You mean they didn't write a 900 page manifesto for the lulz?

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] Treczoks 101 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Anyone who thought different, who thought "Project 2025" was off the table because Trump said so!: You are idiots who should not be allowed to touch anyhing that could break, and you better not breed.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] [email protected] 97 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I'm so fucking done with this country man, people make me so tired of living. I'm so disappointed, and the amount of lives this orange fuck is going to destroy is so immense it's just so depressing. and I hate living in a red state surrounded by idiots who genuinely think this is a good idea, and think I shouldn't even have basic rights.

[–] auzy 53 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Bad news

Trump is amplifying the rhetoric overseas too

So, he's also ruining other countries too

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] normalexit 29 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Part of me wants average people to realize the Republican leadership isn't on their side. The other part of me realizes once normal people take notice, it will be too late.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 72 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Is this news? They presented their plan to destroy America, and are going to implement it. What did people expect?

When someone tells you they are a fascist, believe them the first time.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] wildcardology 61 points 1 month ago (17 children)

I wish Biden has the balls to label them as traitors and use his SC approved powers to jail them for treason.

load more comments (17 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Insert Shocked pikachu face

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Feathercrown 54 points 1 month ago (4 children)

They know they can't win if people know who they are and what they want. Maybe this will teach a small fraction of their supporters who they really are.

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 month ago (6 children)

People knew, they still voted for him.

[–] [email protected] 36 points 1 month ago

They gave him a fucking mandate

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] linearchaos 34 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's not like they've gone through any pains to hide it. Honestly, he stood on stage and shouted it at people. He said it directly to the press.

I'm not sure he could have tried any harder to tell them exactly what his plan was and who he is.

He didn't win despite who he is; he won because of it. He won because his base is that awful.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But the flyer I got attached to my door said Trump totally disavowed it! Would a flyer attached to my door lie?

[–] skeezix 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Would this face lie to you?

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Myxomatosis 44 points 1 month ago

And they want to attack overtime and Social Security. Great fucking job, Americans!

[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Don't forget: replacing nonpartisan government experts with Trump appointees, defending and reclassifying public media and banning pornography.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 43 points 1 month ago

May the ones responsible suffer the consequences of their actions.

For the very unfortunate people becoming collateral damage, aka the remainder of the human population, may fate look mercifully upon us.

[–] spicylemon 41 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Can’t wait for every one of you fucks to realize what you’ve done voting for that scum. We’re all fucked.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] seeyouatthepartyrichter 39 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Are we witnessing the extinction of mankind?

[–] samus12345 36 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The hastening of it via increased climate change, yes.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randon31415 31 points 1 month ago (8 children)

Either they run into the filibuster in the senate and it stops most of this, or we finally do away with the filibuster and when the democrats come in to clean up after 2/4 years of disaster, we don't have the filibuster stopping all the good ideas the democrats are suppose to support.

[–] [email protected] 41 points 1 month ago

Assuming the ditch the filibuster and implement 2025, there will be no more elections.

[–] Tyfud 37 points 1 month ago

None of it will matter because there won't ever be another free and fair election again.

[–] [email protected] 33 points 1 month ago (2 children)

There will be no "democrats come in". I'll be surprised if there is ever another election.

The only thing that could change this is the people making heads roll.

But we won't.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23 29 points 1 month ago

it's funny, you think there's enough time.

clocks done, boy. the bell has rung, the match called, and the crowd is gone.

pack your bags and find somewhere else to hang up your hat.

we lost, so much.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] [email protected] 30 points 1 month ago (2 children)

The Americans are now really the leopards that are eating their faces in this moment.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›