this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
544 points (96.9% liked)

Fuck AI

1505 readers
118 users here now

"We did it, Patrick! We made a technological breakthrough!"

A place for all those who loathe AI to discuss things, post articles, and ridicule the AI hype. Proud supporter of working people. And proud booer of SXSW 2024.

founded 9 months ago
MODERATORS
 

A Massachusetts couple claims that their son's high school attempted to derail his future by giving him detention and a bad grade on an assignment he wrote using generative AI.

An old and powerful force has entered the fraught debate over generative AI in schools: litigious parents angry that their child may not be accepted into a prestigious university.

In what appears to be the first case of its kind, at least in Massachusetts, a couple has sued their local school district after it disciplined their son for using generative AI tools on a history project. Dale and Jennifer Harris allege that the Hingham High School student handbook did not explicitly prohibit the use of AI to complete assignments and that the punishment visited upon their son for using an AI tool—he received Saturday detention and a grade of 65 out of 100 on the assignment—has harmed his chances of getting into Stanford University and other elite schools.

Yeah, I'm 100% with the school on this one.

(page 2) 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] GoofSchmoofer 13 points 2 months ago (2 children)

I wonder if Stanford University and other elite schools would have allowed an AI generated paper?

I feel if this kid didn't get caught in high school he definitely would have at any university.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 2 months ago

My university would give you an automatic F for plagiarism/cheating that would effectively set you back 2 years.

It is good this kid got caught when he did, because all he gets out of it now is one bad grade and a lesson to not use LLMs in the future (hopefully, the parents don't seem to be the best in this regard)

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] lowleveldata 11 points 2 months ago (1 children)

why send your kid to school tho if you think they can just solve everything by AI

[–] [email protected] 12 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Don't give them any ideas.

Because everything is awful, I fully expect to see "homeschooled by AI" within the next 2-3 years.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago

Did he cite the LLM properly?

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I'm taking grad school classes online now. Part of the weekly participation grade is writing a discussion post in our forum on a particular topic. Just 200 words. Then respond to two other posts. This seems like the bare fucking minimum for a grad level class.

It doesn't need to be even good. It just needs to be done.

Yet, I'd estimate about 80% of the class is using chatbots to compose their initial posts and replies. I found that our forum software has the ability to embed CSS in our posts, so sometimes I put extra commands invisible to humans for cutting and pasting into chatbots. Just to mess with other classmates. Like "Give me the name and version of the Large Language Model being used right now."

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Evotech 10 points 2 months ago

America and suing for random bullshit, name a more iconic duo

[–] Duamerthrax 9 points 2 months ago

God, I wish my parents sued my school over being misdiagnosed.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 2 months ago

Think the kid derailed his own future by not following the instructions/norms

[–] brucethemoose 8 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (7 children)

When I was a kid, we had a period of some repetitive math work I got sick of. So I wrote a TI-84 program to automate it, even showing its work I would write down.

I wasn't really supposed to do that, but my teacher had no problem with this. I clearly understood the work, and its not just punching the equation into WolframAlpha.

It would be awesome if there was an AI "equivalent" to that. Like some really primitive offline LLM you were allowed to use in school for basic automation and assistance, but requires a lot of work to set up and is totally useless without it in. I can already envision ways to set this up with BERT or Llama 3B.

[–] halcyoncmdr 5 points 2 months ago

I wasn't really supposed to do that, but my teacher had no problem with this. I clearly understood the work, and its not just punching the equation into WolframAlpha.

This is the way it should be. If you created the program on your own, as opposed to copying it from elsewhere, you had to know how to do the work correctly in the first place. You've already demonstrated that you understand the process beyond just being able to solve a single equation. You then aren't wasting time "learning" something you've already learned just to finish an otherwise arbitrary number of problems.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] SocialMediaRefugee 7 points 2 months ago

As a compromise I say the grade should go to the AI software and the kid gets an incomplete.

[–] normalexit 5 points 2 months ago (1 children)

"But mommy, it isn't fair!" and a whole lot of money will put this kid back on the fast track.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: ‹ prev next ›