TootSweet

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] TootSweet 1 points 31 minutes ago

Yeah, I'm planning to switch from Arch to Gentoo. Systemd isn't the only reason, but it's a big one.

(Yes, I know about Artix, but it's... kindof a Frankenstein's monster, still mostly depending on the Arch repos and still with certain relics of Systemd. Or at least it was when I last tried it.)

[–] TootSweet 1 points 1 hour ago

Nah. Just one big one. The eighth wonder.

[–] TootSweet 6 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Can you get bird flu by sharing needles with a bluejay?

[–] TootSweet 1 points 1 hour ago

Great article and just as relevant today. Probably more so, honestly.

Even in the software engineering profession, there's a lot of that kind of illiteracy going on. Not to the extent of thinking their computer is off because the monitor is off. But for instance:

  • Not thinking to narrow down the problem they're having to whether it's a problem with their build script(s) or a problem with their IDE. ("It's got red squigglies" means it won't build, right? If I had a nickel for every time a developer on my team came to me with red squigglies saying they'd tried X, Y, and Z changes to the build script without even trying to run a build from the terminal to see if that worked (and when they did try that at my suggestion, it did build just fine), I'd've invested in a piggy bank by now.)
  • Writing/modifying code, but just having no idea (or desire to have any idea) how to start an application from scratch, tweak any of the code/processes that deploy the application (let alone build new processes for deploying), troubleshoot at least some issues with dependencies/libraries (for instance, by consulting the source code of FOSS dependencies), etc.
  • Spending hours writing a web app in Java or whatever to do some simple thing that would be a 30-second Bash one-liner. (Or 10-minute Bash one-liner including learning curve.) Just because they don't think it's... feasible?... to learn how to write, say, a for loop in Bash.
  • Writing/maintaining the back end of web apps daily but having zero understanding of the HTTP protocol or JS.

And of course, this isn't everyone. And I don't expect anyone who has just finished their college degree to show up to their first day of work knowing how to generate their own certificate authority using OpenSSL on the command line in less than 5 minutes, fully understanding every step of the process. But the above examples are all pretty senior folks. And some folks come straight out of college and pick that sort of stuff up extremely quickly. So, it's not just about how much experience they have.

[–] TootSweet 1 points 1 day ago

Yeah, no. If I want to learn fiction, I'll watch Battlestar Galactica or something.

[–] TootSweet 12 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Yeah, it makes sense that if you teach someone to use a hammer (train them to kill people), there's a likelihood they're going to view at least some problems as nails (they're going to kill people.)

[–] TootSweet 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Well, yes and no. But mostly yes. But kinda no. It's complicated.

Everybody, including both the "pOlItiCaL lEfT" in the U.S. and the MAGA Republicans can see... shit's kinda fucked, right? The whole world is kinda floundering right now, and the U.S. more so than many of the other parts that think of themselves as "developed" and "world powers."

And the way in which the U.S. is borked is one that hits pretty close to home for people. People's jobs are on shaky ground. And even most people with job security get ridiculously low pay. Meanwhile, the price of things like housing and medical care continues to climb.

And what passes as the "left wing" in the U.S. recognizes that the root of most of those problems is capitalism. All while capitalism is continuing to churn out propaganda in its own defense, convincing people that their jobs aren't tenuous because billionaires are assholes but rather because Mexicans are going to steal your jobs. And that worker pay isn't low because billionaires are assholes, but because the EPA is putting an undue burden on your employer, making it impossible for poor him with his seven yachts to pay you a living wage.

So, you do have to realize there is a massive propaganda campaign going on in the U.S. (not exclusively in the U.S., but it's gotten a lot of traction in the U.S.) constantly feeding people in the U.S. racist, hate-filled, fascist conspiracy theories.

But it's also the case that some people fall for it (and perpetuate it) and others don't. And in that regard, it's not as if you can put all the blame on the corporations and leave none for individual hate-filled, racist, fascist assholes.

But, it is the case that Trump and the right wing have managed to convert the discontent into support specifically for Trump via racism and hate. Where as the left(er) has the same discontent, but no love for Trump, and arguably much much less hate and racism.

So, I guess, again, the answer is "yes and no; it's complicated."

And of course all the above is a massive oversimplification as well.

[–] TootSweet 3 points 1 day ago

Yes. Better is the NEO-PI.

[–] TootSweet 21 points 1 day ago

Just about everyone looks better when they smile.

You're the one who brought looks into it.

[–] TootSweet 2 points 2 days ago

Cheese isn't authentic asian food.

[–] TootSweet 24 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (2 children)

There are definitely more hydrogen atoms in a mole of water than stars in the Milky Way.

The Milky Way has somewhere between 100 and 400 billion stars according to Wikipedia (1*10^11 to 4*10^11). A mole of water has 6.022*10^23 molecules in it, each of which has two hydrogen atoms in it for a total of 1.2044*10^24 hydrogen atoms.

10^24 / 10^11 = 10^13 which is ten trillion. So, a mole of water has roughly ten trillion times as many hydrogen atoms as the Milky Way has stars.

[–] TootSweet 2 points 2 days ago (3 children)
 

And it bugs me a little, but apparently not enough that I've actually done something about it.

 

This image is the first appearance of the character of Popeye.

Other things going into the public domain as of the beginning of 2025 can be found here: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2025_in_public_domain

 

I.

Hate.

Country.

Music.

Or at least that's something I'd've said, say, maybe 5 or 6 years ago. And it was true! I hadn't heard a single song I could identify as "country" that I could stand, let alone "like".

But it all started with Lil' Nas X and "Old Town Road". I think the first time I heard it, I dismissed it without really "getting" it. But when I started hearing and liking other things by Lil' Nas X, and when one of my favorite YouTube content creators said good things about "Old Town Road" on a stream, I listened again. More out of curiosity than anything. But with more context, I understood "Old Town Road" better. And, dare I say, liked it.

"It's ironic country music", I told myself. "It's ok for me to like that. It's got the affectations of country music, but it's not country music in its bones. It's actually pop if you really think about it."

I.

Hate.

Country.

Music.

(Except "Old Town Road" because it's only "ironically" country.)

See? It's so simple. The world still made sense. And I could listen to it and like it, and admit to myself that I liked it.

And then came Jelly Roll.

It was New Year's Eve (I don't remember what year it was), and I was watching New Year's Rockin' Eve as I do every year (and plan to this year). And on comes a country artist. I groaned and reached for the mute button. But my friend wanted to hear it. So...

He sang "Need A Favor." And, it was... good. I liked it.

Try as I might, I couldn't think of an excuse why I was allowed to like it. And I didn't listen to anything else by him for a good while, gut when I did, I liked it too.

I.

Hate.

Country.

Music.

(Except that one song by Nas X. And I guess I like that one song by Jelly Roll. But that's it.)

And I did listen to a little more Jelly Roll and it was surprisingly enjoyable as well. And I still hadn't resolved the cognitive dissonance when...

Bam! The most recent episode of SNL came on. And the musical guest was Shaboozey.

And since then I have not been able to stop listening to "A Bar Song (Tipsy)" practically on repeat.

And it was a few days before I let the ~~intrusive thoughts~~YouTube algorithm win and play me another Shaboozey song. It was "Highway." And holy shit, it was... if anything better than "Tipsy".

And I've listened to a bunch of Shaboozey since, and his stuff ranges from "actually really good" to "I can't stop playing it."

I...

guess I...

kinda... maybe...

like...

country music...

actually?

It's really surreal. But it's clearly impossible to continue to believe that "I don't like country music".

The jury's still out on Post Malone's "I Had Some Help" featuring Morgan Wallen. But honestly, I'm listening to it as I write this to try to form a more solid opinion on it and I can feel it growing on me a bit.

I'm not sure whether I'm changing or country music is. This is all still very new to me.

Maybe I've just been racist against country music until I started seeing some less "traditional" country musicians. A part of me is worried the country music I've been enjoying lately is going to end up being a gateway drug to the harder stuff like Kenny Chesney's "She Thinks My Tractor's Sexy" and Toby Keith's "As Good As I Once Was". But doing research for this Lemmy post, I just listened to a (small) part of each of those two, and I can report I'm at no risk of developing a habit of either of those.

...for now.

 

We all know about the linear_extrude(...) function that turns 2d things into 3d things.

I sometimes have found myself wishing for a similar function which could make a more rounded, result.

Just to illustrate what I'm hoping to achieve, my dream solution would, given this 2d outline:

Capsule-shaped 2d outline.

would give me something like the following:

The same outline "pillowed" up into the third dimension.

Another angle of demonstrating the "back"/"bottom" is flat.

Just to further illustrate, the code I used to generate outline above:

hull() {
	for (i=[-1:1])
		translate([i*15, 0])
			circle(d=10);
}

And the "pillowed" version that shows the desired result giving the above outline:

$fn=64;
rotate([0, 90, 0])
	linear_extrude(30, center=true)
		scale([4, 10])
			difference() {
				circle(d=1);
				translate([0.5, 0])
					square(1, center=true);
			}
for (i = [-1, 1])
	translate([i*15, 0, 0])
		scale([10, 10, 4])
			difference() {
				sphere(d=1);
				translate([0, 0, -0.5])
					cube(1, center=true);
			}

The outline I actually want to pillow for my particular current use case looks like this:

A pattern in the style of a Talavera tile.

(Credit to this person on Printables for the Talavera tile pattern.)

I'm hoping there's a way to do this I'm not thinking of, or a library I'm not familiar with. The example above makes an elliptical curve, but I'm not married to elliptical in particular. Anything somewhat similar would be fine.

Thanks in advance for any help!

43
Did Trump vote? Could he have? (self.nostupidquestions)
 

He's a convicted felon, right? And that means he isn't eligible to vote, right? So he didn't/couldn't vote, right?

 

A friend/coworker of mine and his wife hosted a weekly boardgame night that I attended. Most of the other guests were kinda flaky, and this one particular day, I was the only one who showed up. So it was just me, my friend, and his wife.

Someone suggested Dixit, which I had never played before, but it sounded fun and I was down to play. So we broke it out, shuffled, and started the game.

Now, if you don't know how Dixit works, it's basically a deck of cards with pictures on them. One of a toy abacus. Another of a child pointing a toy sword at a dragon. Another of a winding staircase with a snail at the bottom. Etc.

In one version of the game similar to Apples to Apples or Scategories, everyone gets a hand of cards which they keep hidden. The dealer announces a clue and everyone (including the dealer) contributes a card from their hands face-down to the center of the table and the dealer shuffles them together and reveals them all at once without revealing whose card is whose. Then players vote which one they think matches the clue. You get points as a player if others vote for your card or if you vote for the one the dealer picked. As a dealer, you get points if close to 50% of the players vote for yours.

I was the dealer this round. One of the cards in my hand was of a ship's anchor. That's when it came to me.

See, the friend/coworker and I both worked in web software development. His wife didn't. And I came up with the perfect play. I gave the clue "hyperlink." Hyperlinks on web pages are created using the HTML <a> tag. The "a" stands for "anchor." And any web developer would know that.

When the vote came in, I got one vote for my card from my friend and his wife failed to select the correct card and so didn't get any points. It was a slam dunk move. But I felt a little bad for excluding my friend's wife from an inside-knowledge thing.

The next round, my friend was the dealer and he picked a rule/card that was an inside-knowledge thing between the two of them. (A line from a poem they both knew well, the next line of which related to the picture of the card.) So I was glad of that.

 

I'm in the middle of this book currently. I didn't read it sooner just because it was written long ago and I was hoping for the latest information on SzPD.

But now I wish I'd read it sooner.

A quote from the book that I thought was pretty good. This refers specifically to schizoid patients.

I have found encouraging results with several patients who, each in his or her own different way, have been able to find security for their regressed ego in the psychotherapeutic relationship. There appear to be two aspects of the problem. The first is the slow growth out of their antilibidinal (Freudian sadistic superego) persecution of themselves; they need to unlearn their ruthless driving of themselves by ceaseless inner mental pressure to keep going as 'forced pseudo-adults' and to acquire the courage to adopt more of the understanding attitude of the therapist to the hard pressed and frightened child within. Simultaneously with this there goes a second process, the growth of a constructive faith that if the needs of the regressed ego are met, first in the relation to the therapist who protects it in its need for an initial passive dependence, this will mean not collapse and loss of active powers for good and all, but a steady recuperation from deep strain, diminishing of deep fears, revitalization of the personality, and rebirth of an active ego that is spontaneous and does not have to be forced and driven; what Balint calls 'primitive passive dependence' making possible 'the new beginning'. Finally we must stress that regression and illness are not the same thing. Regression is a flight backwards in search of security and a chance of a new start. But regression becomes illness in the absence of any therapeutic person to regress with and to.

3
I use Arch, BTW (self.linux_shitposting)
submitted 3 months ago by TootSweet to c/linux_shitposting
 

Sound off in comments.

No non-Arch users allowed.

 

Schizoid Angst's first interview of Dr. Elinor Greenberg.

5
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by TootSweet to c/justpost
 

So, there's this guy at work, right? And I've been working with him for probably a year or so by the time this story takes place. Same team and everything. Kindof elbow-to-elbow. Good guy.

The company would take us all out to lunch occasionally. And this one time, 15 or so of us are all sat down at the chain restaurant and shooting the shit about whatever.

And the music playing at the restaurant plays a song by Imagine Dragons. And then some other random song. And then another one by Imagine Dragons.

I don't remember specifically how many Imagine Dragons songs they played before we even got our food, but it was enough in a short enough period that someone commented "huh, they're playing a lot of Imagine Dragons today."

And this was in the period when it was in vogue to dunk on Imagine Dragons, right? And so I'm like "yeah, at least they're playing Imagine Dragons songs from back when Imagine Dragons was good."

And I expect folks to banter back at me and maybe some folks would defend Imagine Dragons, but probably more would agree, or even take the position that Imagine Dragons was never good. (Again, that was in vogue at the time.)

But everyone just kind of looks at me awkwardly.

And I have no idea what's going on until the guy next to me leans over and lets me in on it.

Apparently the guy directly across from me grew up with the Imagine Dragons band members and nearly ended up in the band at one point in his life.

And I worked with the guy for a year and never knew that. And I kindof looked like an asshole over it. What are the chances! I don't live anywhere near Las Vegas where Imagine Dragons came from or anything.

I appologised, of course. He kindof laughed it off, but I still felt bad about it.

In retrospect, a piece of me wonders if the boss hadn't called ahead and asked the restaurant to play a lot of Imagine Dragons just to make the guy across from me feel special or something. But then again, the vibe this chain restaurant gave off was that probably the restaurant didn't really control the playlist at all. Probably it was just some XM station or something. (It didn't have a DJ or any speaking between songs or anything. Just music. So maybe that gives some credence to the boss-called-ahead theory? Dunno. Dunno.)

Maybe some day I should call the restaurant and ask if they're able to take music requests or whatever just to get some closure. Lol.

view more: next ›