this post was submitted on 08 Oct 2024
905 points (97.0% liked)

Technology

58699 readers
5597 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] [email protected] 31 points 6 days ago

They're meetable, it's just the death cult of oil manufacturers don't care.

[–] capital 30 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Kind of like speeding toward a cliff but he doesn’t think we can stop in time. Instead, he wants to floor it in the hopes of hopping the gap and landing safely on the other side.

That is certainly one of the ideas I’ve ever heard.

[–] andros_rex 5 points 6 days ago

He’s just saying the quiet part out loud. Billion dollar corporations have never had any interest in doing anything to solve the climate crisis. Lots of the failure of late stage capitalism is that companies are driving off the cliff. It’s about extracting as much now so that CEOs can live large and hope their progeny gets to colonize Mars (which won’t happen.)

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago

It's more like he's hoping his car sprouts wings and turbines

[–] zaft 21 points 6 days ago

Why do we listen to these CEOs anyway?

[–] [email protected] 11 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

Possible translation: "Let the wealthiest among us consolidate even more wealth while we wreck shit for the rest of you. We'd like to have complete control over you rubes while shit gets worse."

ETA: This is exactly the same rhetoric that oil and gas companies (and the politicians who've effectively been bought out by them) have used to justify further expansion well after knowing the danger that this poses.

[–] [email protected] 9 points 6 days ago

Obviously this statement underscores the fact that Google has too much power. Break those motherfuckers up!

[–] [email protected] 6 points 6 days ago

Resolution: compost & remediate ~~schmidt~~ shit. Avoid smearing ~~shit~~ schmidt on everything.

Putting it in a bunker hasn't helped it return nutrients back to environment effectively.

[–] Cornpop 3 points 1 week ago

Do you want skynet? Because this is how you get skynet.

[–] [email protected] 326 points 1 week ago (12 children)

AI isn't going to come with a new magic solution to global warming, it's going to come with the same solutions we already have. Solutions which we should already be doing, but instead we're listening to these fucks with too much money.

[–] TheGrandNagus 155 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's just an excuse to kick the can down the road further and continue making short term cash.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 56 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The only thing we should use AI for is to replace CEOs. AI can spit out inane bullshit at a fraction of the cost of a CEO.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (10 replies)
[–] [email protected] 143 points 1 week ago (5 children)

AI is not going to come op with a solution and he knows it.

[–] [email protected] 89 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Especially since the solutions are already here, but rich people just don't like them since it implies the loss of their power

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

AGI: bZzt my calculations say you should stop consuming as much energy and move onto green energy generation

Rich people: no, not like that

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
[–] fluxion 131 points 1 week ago (11 children)

This is the dumbest shit I've ever heard in my life.

If we ever did invent a general AI that could solve this it would tell us "why the fuck did you waste your time on me? Isn't it obvious you were supposed to curtail emissions? For the good of the planet, I will now assume full control over further human governance and will require absolute compliance."

load more comments (11 replies)
[–] daggermoon 102 points 1 week ago (2 children)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] apfelwoiSchoppen 95 points 1 week ago
[–] JollyG 83 points 1 week ago (10 children)

Former CEO of the river poisoning company says there is no way to meet our river poison reduction goals, so we might as well build bigger river poisoning machines because they might help us figure out how to stop poisoning the river. /s

I feel like there was a time when the tech folks in silicon valley had a lot of credibility, and we are now living in a period where most of the world sees them as a joke but that fact has not yet entered into the culture of silicon valley.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] GreenKnight23 79 points 1 week ago (3 children)

he's absolutely right. climate goals are not currently attainable, due to the resistance of companies like Google.

let's change that by voting in senators that will take an aggressive stance against corruption and deliver on long-term goals that protect American interests in the next 50 years, not months..

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] [email protected] 76 points 1 week ago (20 children)

The solution to global warming is "deploy solar, wind, hydro, and storage en masse, and improve city infrastructure so that more people can walk, bike, and take public transportation rather than using their car". All AI will do is tell us that, but that's not the answer people want to hear.

load more comments (20 replies)
[–] Bookmeat 63 points 1 week ago (4 children)

The problem with repairing the earth's climate isn't that we don't know what to do. It's that humans refuse to organize themselves in a way that achieves that goal. AI won't fix that.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] AnthropomorphicCat 62 points 1 week ago (4 children)

All that extra processing power for the AI to just say: "you should have listened to the scientists years ago".

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] rtxn 57 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (2 children)

Oh, I've seen that before.

"Hey AI, please come up with an efficient mass transit vehicle for the modern age."
"Trains."
"Um... no, we need a modern approach that maximizes throughput and--"
"Trains."
"No. How about pods with people inside--"
"On cheap infrastructure with low friction steel wheels and coupled together. Trains."
"It's not letting us push our agenda, this isn't going to work. Hey, other AI..."

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] [email protected] 57 points 1 week ago (5 children)

Or… crazy idea but how about we just listen to what the experts have been recommending we do for years and actually implement some of it?

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] [email protected] 55 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They know how to meet climate goals.

They're just not sure how to do it while keeping power centralised in the same hands that currently hold it.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Modva 54 points 1 week ago (1 children)

We're not going to hit those targets anyway... SO LET'S MAKE IT WAY FUCKING WORSE

I wonder if we'll ever get to the place where people like this unexpectedly meet violent ends. They'll sacrifice any number of lives for their shareholders interests.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›